Science Disproves Evolution

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Ichabod said:
You're pretty much the only one, besides Pahu, that's posting on this thread in
opposition to scientific findings. Maybe you're nonsensical?
Click to expand...

Why would holding an unpopular opinion demonstrate that the opinion is nonsensical? Do you mean to imply that if people understood what megaman125 was saying, they would be more likely to reply ot it? I usually find megaman125's posts to be very clear, even though they are usually mean-spirited and often dishonest.
 
danschance said:
Actually, that video is just an attack on the bible and Christianity and those who post it on this site should be banned. The video posts things which no christian acknowledges. The Mosaic laws were fulfilled by Christ 2000 years ago and Christians do not follow the mosaic laws. Even Jews today do not follow the things posted in that video.

It is the same as making fun of English by making a video of the rule of thumb. A man could legally beat his with with a stick if it was no larger than the diameter of his thumb. Or making fun of Hammurabi by saying it is OK to pluck a man's eye out if he caused another man's eye to go blind. Or Make fun of modern day Americans because they at one time tied women to a chair and cast it into water to see if it would float and prove that she is a witch.

So as you can see that video is just another hair brained hit job on Christianity. It is nothing more than myopic contempt with as much intellectualism as a sophomoric hazing of a pleb. Not to mention that video also contains several straw men.

I am going to hit the report button on the person who posted it and let the mods do their job.
Click to expand...

People seem to forget that the old Mosaic laws
were given and commanded by the same God
that us Christians worship today. Don't be
ashamed and try to suppress the truth.

The video points out the irony of quoting a
verse about murder, for example, and the
Christian says ''out of context!'' However,
when someone quotes John 3:16, no
context is required. Why is that?
 
AvalonXQ said:
Why would holding an unpopular opinion demonstrate that the opinion is nonsensical? Do you mean to imply that if people understood what megaman125 was saying, they would be more likely to reply ot it? I usually find megaman125's posts to be very clear, even though they are usually mean-spirited and often dishonest.
Click to expand...

No, I just noticed that megaman125 is the only repeat
poster on this thread in opposition to what scientists
study in labs all day long. He seems to have a big
problem with evolution but most people on this forum
don't and that is evident due to the lack of replies from
other people.

Pahu's basically spammed the entire Internet with
his copy pastes and they're universally rejected. It's
quite funny to read the replies on Topix.
 
Ichabod said:
No, I just noticed that megaman125 is the only repeat poster on this thread in opposition to what scientists study in labs all day long. He seems to have a big problem with evolution but most people on this forum don't and that is evident due to the lack of replies from other people.
Click to expand...

It seems to me that there aren't that many repeat posters on this thread, period. I don't think that we can assume, from the lack of activity in this thread, that most posters accept the scientific evidence for evolution rather than agreeing with the creationist position.
 
danschance said:
So if a person tends to post frequently they are spammers?
Click to expand...

He's posted the same stuff over and over on this thread. I've seen the
pictures of dogs at least 5 times.

Here's a screenshot from a Google search but there's even more than what
this shows.

Screen shot 2013-09-20 at 7.45.24 PM.png
Screen shot 2013-09-20 at 7.49.31 PM.png
 
Again, because a person frequently posts, does not make them a spammer.. A spammer is one who floods with emails or advertisements. A spammer (your words) is not one who posts frequently on a topic. You seem to want to somehow discredit him by slandering his character with an ad hominem attack.

If you don't like how his posts, you can find someplace else to stir the pot and bash the bible.
 
danschance said:
Again, because a person frequently posts, does not make them a spammer.. A spammer is one who floods with emails or advertisements. A spammer (your words) is not one who posts frequently on a topic. You seem to want to somehow discredit him by slandering his character with an ad hominem attack.

If you don't like how his posts, you can find someplace else to stir the pot and bash the bible.
Click to expand...

Thanks for your opinion. In my opinion the guy is a trolling spammer.
It's all copy paste from creation.com
 
Last edited:
I don't appreciate Pahu's repetitive and huge cut-and-pastes, but I wouldn't say he's just a spammer. He responded at least perfunctorily to replies in this thread.
 
He seems to have a big
problem with evolution but most people on this forum
don't and that is evident due to the lack of replies from
other people.
Click to expand...

That is an absolutely horrible assumption and to imply that that is evidence for people not having an issue with evolution is very telling of your idea of evidence.
 
AvalonXQ said:
I don't appreciate Pahu's repetitive and huge cut-and-pastes, but I wouldn't say he's just a spammer. He responded at least perfunctorily to replies in this thread.
Click to expand...

Did you see my screenshot above? The guy has done this all over the internet, it's insane.
 
Iiiii haven't been here in months!
I also found Pahu's copy+pasting irritatingly impersonal, but he does respond personally to the more specific and interesting questions.
 
Ichabod said:
No, I just noticed that megaman125 is the only repeat
poster on this thread in opposition to what scientists
study in labs all day long. He seems to have a big
problem with evolution but most people on this forum
don't and that is evident due to the lack of replies from
other people.
Click to expand...

Or maybe other Christians are just wise enough that when they see a 66 page thread that has a topic title about how someone is declaring they don't believe evolution, they are wise enough to stay away because they know that with 66 pages the thread must be filled with typical evolutionists who's beliefs are threatened by people who say they don't believe evolution, and know that those typical evolutionists can't be reasoned with and thus don't waste their time. I should join that group soon.

Ichabod said:
This is my standard of evidence.

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Scientific "Proof", scientific evidence, and the scientific method
Click to expand...

Well then, in my opinion, your standard of evidence is pretty low. (That's what evolutionists tell me all the time about evidence for the Bible, so I'm going to pull one of their typical one-liners.)
 
megaman125 said:
Well then, in my opinion, your standard of evidence is pretty low. (That's what evolutionists tell me all the time about evidence for the Bible, so I'm going to pull one of their typical one-liners.)
Click to expand...

How is the standard of evidence used by the top scientists of today considered low?
I have made no mention of the Bible whatsoever.

megaman125 said:
I can explain them, yes.
Click to expand...

Well, if you can explain them please pick JUST ONE
evidence from here: 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent
and show why it's not valid. That's not asking for too much is it?
 
Ichabod said:
Thanks for your opinion. In my opinion the guy is a trolling spammer.
It's all copy paste from creation.com
Click to expand...

Most atheists do the exact same thing. They copy and paste the same filth from YouTube, from Dawkins and other trash filled websites.
 
danschance said:
Most atheists do the exact same thing. They copy and paste the same filth from YouTube, from Dawkins and other trash filled websites.
Click to expand...

More opinion...you might have a point except all the stuff Pahu posts is untrue and not scientific.
Plus, Walt Brown is not a reputable scientist in any field.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back