1 John 1:9 promises that sin will be removed.If the believer's sin was really removed, there would be no need of 1 John 1:9
1 John 1:9 promises that sin will be removed.If the believer's sin was really removed, there would be no need of 1 John 1:9
There is a conditional promise given in holy scripture...of baptism of the Holy Ghost...the condition of the promise being water baptism in Jesus' Name (Acts 2:38-39).No, it is the baptism of the Holy Spirit that saves. Not water.
Your theory is all wet.![]()
Why do you associate permanent glorification with having our sins washed away as if BOTH must occur at the same moment AND be permanent?It just means that imperfection will not drag you into hell because Jesus paid the price that we could not pay. We have not been glorified yet, but that day shall come. Godspeed.
There is no verse that says that water baptism saves.Yet, that is different than saying that water baptism has the power to save; which is true according to scripture.
That reply boggles my mind!..It's a simple fact that Baptism is just a public declaration. A banana is a type of fruit. This is very deep, yah?
Sheer speculation. Paul's answer to the jailer REFUTES your claim.Paul had his primary converts do the baptizing.
I'm not arguing against water baptism. I AM arguing against the theory that water baptism saves the soul. It does not.It is not as though his converts were not being baptized (see Acts 18:8...which refers to Corinth...and note that your verses are in 1 Corinthians).
Why do you continue to argue against the FACT that Paul's answer to the jailer REFUTES your claim? If water baptism was required to be saved, then Paul's answer WOULD HAVE included water baptism. How can you not see that?Paul did not baptize people himself, except for Crispus and Gaius and Stephanas...but it is clear that the people in Corinth were many of them baptized (Acts 18:8)...which indicates that Paul utilized Jesus' same tactic as concerning baptism as is spoken of in John 4:2.
One can receive the Holy Ghost (even salvation)a s the result of water baptism in Jesus' Name (Acts 2:38-39)
I've already explained that verse to you, but you seem to have closed your eyes.
Gal 3:2 and 5 tells us how we receive the Holy Spirit. He is NOT a ghost.
2 I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by believing what you heard?
5 So again I ask, does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you by the works of the law, or by your believing what you heard?
This is just so simple. The Holy Spirit is received by "believing what we hear", which is the gospel. Where do you see any mention of water baptism here?
Seriously?? NO symbol saves. It is what the symbol symbolizes thaty saves. How can you not know that?Yes, it is a symbol. When we implement the symbol, it is the symbol that now saves us (1 Peter 3:20-21).
So it your preaching about liquid baptism.The preaching of the Cross is foolishness (nonsense) to those who are perishing (1 Corinthians 1:18).
Sure I can. I just gave you several verses that, taken by your view, make God to be a schizophrenic.You are promoting Tritheism rather than the Trinity. You therefore cannot honestly call yourself a Trinitarian.
Prove it. Quote the creeds. But it doesn't what the creeds say.No; they are distinct rather than separate; even according to the creeds.
Your theology is schizophrenic.There is one Lord (Ephesians 4:5); even the Father according to that verse, and Matthew 11:25.
yet, no one can say that Jesus is the Lord except by the Holy Ghost (1 Corinthians 12:3). And, Jesus is the Lord (1 Corinthians 8:6).
In light of the fact that there is one Lord (Ephesians 4:5), even the Father (Matthew 11:25, Luke 10:21), can you say that Jesus is the one Lord?
If you cannot, then you do not have the Holy Ghost (1 Corinthians 12:3).
It is truly sad that you can't see the absurdity in what you say.Father and Son are distinct from each other in that the Father is a Spirit inhabiting eternity without flesh; while the Son is that same Spirit incarnated in flesh.
Such a theology is schizophrenic.But they are the same Person in that they are the same Spirit.
Although I see a PROMISE being made in Acts 2:38 towards receiving the Holy Ghost, I feel your proposal might have error when it goes so far as to suggest water baptism is a pre-requisite for receiving the Holy Ghost. The biblical examples seem to show otherwise.There is a conditional promise given in holy scripture...of baptism of the Holy Ghost...the condition of the promise being water baptism in Jesus' Name (Acts 2:38-39).
Impossible. If that were so, we wouldn't need 1 John 1:9, and Paul himself was crazy to write Romans 7.It is referring to sin itself.
Everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself even as He is pure.
Stop begging. Jesus is perfectly pure. Unlike human beings in the flesh. However that will all be resolved when believers receive their glorified bodies, and we shall be like He is.Which begs the question,
How pure is Jesus Christ?
Just read it over and over until it actually sinks in. Paul was describing his own PRESENT struggle with sin.Romans 7:14-25 is Paul using the literary tactic of IDENTIFICATION (as he later tells us in 1 Corinthians 9:22) to identify carnality in order that he might win the carnal person.
Please pay better attention. I never said he was "actually carnal when he wrote the chapter". I SAID he was describing his own struggle with sin. The chapter is actually quite clear. You should read it sometime.If Paul were actually carnal when he wrote that scripture, he would not have been penning holy scripture.
Correct. And Paul was describing his own personal struggle with sin.For the scripture is clear (2 Peter 1:20-21) that holy scripture was penned when holy men of God were moved by the Holy Ghost.
@justbyfaith and to let you know, I'm saying that to you because I believe you CAN see (and learn from) truth.Although I see a PROMISE being made in Acts 2:38 towards receiving the Holy Ghost, I feel your proposal might have error when it goes so far as to suggest water baptism is a pre-requisite for receiving the Holy Ghost. The biblical examples seem to show otherwise.
And that is NOT meant to discourage you. I'd just like your belief system to be as spotless as possible.It can be discussed later if desired.
Love in Jesus,
Kelby
Everything you've been posting.What false doctrines?
Let me say that is what I've been doing here.Let me say that if you see false doctrine in what I preach, that you will be held accountable if you do not expose it.
Not permanently. The cleansing is NOW. Not future. We confess the sins we commit and are cleansed.1 John 1:9 promises that sin will be removed.
No, the promise is receiving the Spirit through belief in Christ. Gal 3:2,5 is very clear.There is a conditional promise given in holy scripture...of baptism of the Holy Ghost...the condition of the promise being water baptism in Jesus' Name (Acts 2:38-39).
We must be born again now in order to be glorified later.Why do you associate permanent glorification with having our sins washed away as if BOTH must occur at the same moment AND be permanent?
Love in Jesus,
Kelby
There is a conditional promise given in holy scripture...of baptism of the Holy Ghost...the condition of the promise being water baptism in Jesus' Name (Acts 2:38-39).
That just blows my mind! (so to speak).
utter and complete rubbish
the Bible declares we are saved only through the blood of Christ
you are deceived and trying to lead others away from the pure gospel and the faith that believes in Christ's work on our behalf
Jesus said 'It is finished' meaning a complete work and lacking nothing, yet you hypocrites who say you believe, want to complete a spiritual work of the Holy Spirit by your own flesh and a dunk in the lake
all your work is a filthy rag according to God and that applies to each one of us.
there is only One who can save and a believer knows this and does not try to accomplish in their flesh what only God can do by His Spirit
There are many verses that teach us such a thing (John 3:5, Romans 6:1-4, Galatians 3:27, Colossians 2:11-15, 1 Peter 3:20-21, Ezekiel 36:25-27, to name a few)There is no verse that says that water baptism saves.