So should the Sabbath still be honoured by Christians?
It has to be, because the Sabbath has everything to do with that of salvation.
So should the Sabbath still be honoured by Christians?
On the outskirts one could say Paul was deluded but no, because every word that we have in the Bible is from God Almighty, in other words he crafted the Bible like this to make people think that the Bible cant be trusted and apparent contradictions.
Just HOW are you going to manage to thumb your nose at all rules and at the same time have faith in what God says?
*A shadow of Christ to come.
Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day- things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ.
Colossians 2:16-17 NASB
*
One person regards one day above another, another regards every day alike. Each person must be fully convinced in his own mind. He who observes the day, observes it for the Lord, and he who eats, does so for the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who eats not, for the Lord he does not eat, and gives thanks to God. For not one of us lives for himself, and not one dies for himself; for if we live, we live for the Lord, or if we die, we die for the Lord; therefore whether we live or die, we are the Lord's. For to this end Christ died and lived again, that He might be Lord both of the dead and of the living.
Romans 14:5-9 NASB
*
All things are lawful for me, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be mastered by anything.
1 Corinthians 6:12 NASB
*
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.
Romans 10:4 NASB
If you believe scripture.
when a man comes to Jesus and calls Him 'teacher' and asks 'what works must he do to inherit life' this man has two strikes against himself immediately: He doesn't recognize Jesus as God enfleshed, but as a teacher, and he considers that life may be earned through good deeds and right actions.
Only Christians know Paul wasn't deluded.Starting to get it, but it does lean heavily on Paul.
How do we know Paul wasn't deluded?
If you understand Paul as a brilliant trained rabbi, a believer in God as God was also Christ, it is simple to understand Paul. Paul followed the training he was given by Gamaliel in his exclusive school for rabbis. Paul even uses the same outline for teaching that Gamaliel's school taught.That's an unconvincing article. Of course Saul new all about Christianity and what they believed as he had been arguing against them for years, and trying to drum up opposition to then and what they believed.
Anybody can pretend to be blind, or have a hysterical blindness.
I'm still not able to make my mind up about Paul?![]()
How can you define the scriptures about rest to exclude what God tells us about our body needing rest from our labors one day a week. To rest in the lord is an entirely completely different subject, if you mix them up you are distorting the word of God.Only Christians know Paul wasn't deluded.
Because Christians have come to Christ and have received Rest.
Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
That's what Christ offers.
This is one of the ways Paul explains it;
Galatians 3:24-25
24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Here you go again, adding to what people write and completely changing the meaning. Grandpa wrote nothing at all about "the body needing rest", yet you accuse him of throwing it out. You are picking fights unnecessarily.How can you define the scriptures about rest to exclude what God tells us about our body needing rest from our labors one day a week. To rest in the lord is an entirely completely different subject, if you mix them up you are distorting the word of God.
The rituals God gave is another example. You don't throw out what the rituals were to lead to because you are told to use another way to be led.
Try as I might, I cannot find the word "Saturday" in my Bible, while you speak of distorting the Word of God.When we change the sabbath from Saturday to Sunday, I wonder if God sees the specific day, but only one day a week. However, God said Saturday, and it is not a tradition rather than something God ordained, it is from God.
I'm not a Christian and so I can perhaps be excused from misunderstanding Paul
But that doesn't excuse you lot, if Paul is also doing follow the law then you should. Even if you slip sometimes... don't slip on purpose and say... Oh but faith, faith! That's just lazy.
The OP is about the Sabbath. My point is that Mosaic law still applies in full to the Sabbath for Christians. It's a commandment from God the Father and the Son.
Not being able to do it perfectly doesn't mean it no longer applies.
It no longer being strictly necessary for salvation doesn't mean you can use the new covenant to contrive ways of disobeying God.
The days of the week have been named by people who worship idols, so Monday is named for the moon, Sunday is named by worshippers of the Sun, and Saturday for Saturn. You won't find any of these names in scripture. In scripture there is the first day of the week, the day we call Sunday. Saturday is the last day of the week.Try as I might, I cannot find the word "Saturday" in my Bible, while you speak of distorting the Word of God.
Christianity is all about a living experience of knowing Jesus/having a real relationship with Him. John 17:3 - And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent (which is an intimate, experiential knowledge, found only in a relationship). The term "know" implies intimate, experiential knowledge, through a relationship with Him, not merely theoretical knowledge.As I'm listening to the discussion I get the sense that a living experience of knowing Jesus, having a real relationship with him, is what confirms the scriptures and makes sense of them.
As I'm listening to the discussion I get the sense that a living experience of knowing Jesus, having a real relationship with him, is what confirms the scriptures and makes sense of them.
As I'm listening to the discussion I get the sense that a living experience of knowing Jesus, having a real relationship with him, is what confirms the scriptures and makes sense of them.