I guess our first clue should've been when he changed the name of the Department of Defense to Department of War.
People like Cruz are an offense to God. There will be no peace. After decades of wars and "peacemaking", trillion$ spent, many US soldiers dead, millions of people dead, US reputation destroyed:
- Afghanistan is now run by the Taliban who are more powerful than they've ever been
- Syria is run by Al Qaeda
- Iraq is in ruins
- Libya that once had the highest standard of living in the African continent now openly trades slaves and is torn apart by war
The day is coming when what these people have done will be judged by God, and it will be severe.
Yes, the "full moon thesis" — the idea that a bright full (or near-full) moon would seriously hinder stealth aircraft strikes on Iran by making them more visible or detectable — is largely bogus, especially in the context of modern military aviation like the 2025 Israel-Iran strikes. Here's why it doesn't hold up:
The thesis seems to stem from outdated ideas about night bombing (e.g., WWII-era concerns) or confusion with low-tech scenarios (like unaided pilots or basic drones). In 2025's high-tech context — where both sides used advanced stealth, jamming, and IR-guided defenses — a bright moon didn't stop Israel from launching the opening strikes or the U.S. from hitting deep bunkers undetected. In short: bogus for stealth jets and modern air defenses. The real factors were surprise, electronic warfare, and platform capabilities — not lunar phases.
- Stealth technology isn't defeated by visible moonlight. Stealth aircraft (e.g., F-35s, F-22s, B-2 bombers used in the conflict) primarily evade radar detection through low-observable shaping, materials, and tactics. Moonlight affects visual spotting by human eyes or basic optical systems, but that's not how advanced air defenses primarily work against high-speed jets. The U.S. B-2 strikes on June 22, 2025 (Operation Midnight Hammer), went completely undetected by Iranian radar, with no defensive fire despite using decoys and escorts. Israel’s initial June 13 strikes (under ~95% waning gibbous illumination, just after full moon) similarly achieved surprise.
- Modern air defenses rely on radar, IR/thermal, and other sensors — not moonlight. Iran's systems like the Majid short-range air defense use thermal imagers and passive infrared homing on missiles. These detect heat signatures (engine exhaust, etc.), which moonlight has zero impact on — thermal cameras work day or night, in fog, clouds, or bright moonlight. Moonlight might slightly help or hinder basic optical/visible-light cameras, but it's irrelevant for thermal-based detection, which is what matters against fast-moving aircraft.
- Historical and scientific evidence shows moonlight has minimal practical effect on advanced night operations. Studies on night vision and visibility (including military contexts) find that beyond ~50% illumination, extra moonlight doesn't meaningfully change performance for equipped forces. For stealth platforms flying at altitude and speed, ground observers or low-end systems spotting them visually under moonlight is negligible — the real threats are radar and missiles, which stealth counters independently.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump declares that President Trump's global tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are unlawful, as the Act does not authorize the President to impose such tariffs.*Walter Bloomberg
@DeItaone
*TRUMP’S GLOBAL TARIFFS STRUCK DOWN BY US SUPREME COURT
Iran will never be free as long as Muslims are in control.When you try to intimidate America and your own people with military exercises, but your moldy old jets crash to the ground in the middle of your blustering threat. God has judged, God will bless US, Iran shall be free, praise Jesus!
About to get a lot of Americans killed.GritGarnish
@ProdDevJoe
Postal service to Middle East apos is suspended… not good, Iran attack looking imminent
Iran will never be free as long as Muslims are in control.
Name me one Muslim nation where the the people are free or the government and religion are separated.That's why a big part of Pahlavi's Cyrus Accords framework is separating church and State in Iran. You cannot neccessarily purge religion one way or the other, but you can definitely you know not have your state run by a cult whose sole claim of legitimacy is that their leader can do a seance and talk to the dead.
Name me one Muslim nation where the the people are free or the government and religion are separated.
Neither of those countries are a true democracy and place sever restrictions of free speech or religion.Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan are muslim majority countries (that also are near to or border Iran) but they have separation of church and State principles.
If you're trying to get me to give you the perfect world, I can't give that to you. The choice here is between having an outright cult control your State and making policy decisions based on what a spirit of a dead boy supposedly tells their leader vs. having a relatively 21st century democracy with separation of church and state and a normative technocratic view of governance in a shia majority country. Pick whatever you think sounds better
Neither of those countries are a true democracy and place sever restrictions of free speech or religion.
I agree that Iran is run by a cult, but I do not see where getting Americans killed to try to change it is our responsibility.
They will never have a true democracy.