God capital (G)So as I said,
you call god a liar and state he will not keep his promise
thank you for proving me right
To use lower caps is claiming the one true (God) is just one of many false god's
God capital (G)So as I said,
you call god a liar and state he will not keep his promise
thank you for proving me right
I disagree and this is ONE of the reasons I disagree.
Rev_3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
He that overcometh is a PILLAR in the temple of God. We know just from that Heavenly Jerusalem is not a physical temple.
1Pe 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
Peter tells us that Heavenly Jerusalem is a SPIRITUAL HOUSE.
This is just one line of proof that Heavenly Jerusalem has ALREADY come down and we should be living in it right now.
No one is claiming that. You are labelling Jews as eternal God haters.Ok, you're the person who says God haters supersede God's chosen people.... I think you're the one who needs to reexamine your position.
No one is claiming that. You are labelling Jews as eternal God haters.
God has promised otherwise. Repeatedly. He will rescue them and they will mourn for him & repent.
People are trying to tell you that our God does not break his promises.
" I swear by myself says Yahweh"
If he broke his promises, our salvation would be worthless.
Right. I showed e-g the land promise was to Christ. Then he ignores what the NT says and diverts the conversation to Israel leaving Egypt. I show him how the NT says Israel leaving Egypt is figurative of Christ and he ignores it.And you would think that shouldn't have to be debated.
You showed Me your opinion and changed the wording of scripture in doing itRight. I showed e-g the land promise was to Christ. Then he ignores what the NT says and diverts the conversation to Israel leaving Egypt. I show him how the NT says Israel leaving Egypt is figurative of Christ and he ignores it.
AlsoRight. I showed e-g the land promise was to Christ. Then he ignores what the NT says and diverts the conversation to Israel leaving Egypt. I show him how the NT says Israel leaving Egypt is figurative of Christ and he ignores it.
No, it's the Apostles teaching. Your belief that the one child the promise was made to is Isaac is what Judaism teaches. Inserting Christ in the text where seed is used doesnt change the meaning of what the NT Jewish writer said about his own scriptures. You dont know more than he did.You showed Me your opinion and changed the wording of scripture in doing it
Shane on you
Yet you have failed to show it. And you changed the wordingNo, it's the Apostles teaching. Your belief that the one child the promise was made to is Isaac is what Judaism teaches. Inserting Christ in the text where seed is used doesnt change the meaning of what the NT Jewish writer said about his own scriptures. You dont know more than he did.
Jesus Returns In Fire And Final Judgement, Dissolving This Existing Earth By FireAlso
Christ gets the whole earth not just one plot of land.
Then God liedJesus Returns In Fire And Final Judgement, Dissolving This Existing Earth By Fire
The New Creation, In A New Heaven Earth, Jerusalem For Eternity
There Will BeNo Millennium On This Earth At The Return Of Jesus Christ, It Will Be Fire Time
God Dosent Lie,You Have Been MisledThen God lied
The terms seed and Christ are interchangeable in how Paul used them concerning that text and the new Jerusalem consists of people who formerly were a mess because of sin. This is something any grown up Christian shouldn't be confused about or have to have explained to them.Yet you have failed to show it. And you changed the wording
all those passage above, where god said he would REBUILD and RESTOR that which was destroyed or scattered because of sin, you have failed to show how new jerusalem was destroyed because of sin, or how all,the children of Israel by birth were given that promise, punished if they failed (lev 26) and restored if they repented (lev 26)
you have a doctrine based on personal belief which has god refusing to keep his promises
Once again, Canaan CAN NOT be the promised land because Abraham never inherited Canaan yet the bible says Abraham inherited the promise land.Gen 17 Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the landof Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”
God never promised any nationality that he would save the entire nation.So as I said,
you call god a liar and state he will not keep his promise
thank you for proving me right
Yep!Right. I showed e-g the land promise was to Christ. Then he ignores what the NT says and diverts the conversation to Israel leaving Egypt. I show him how the NT says Israel leaving Egypt is figurative of Christ and he ignores it.
I am in no way labeling all Jews as God haters. The Jewish God lovers are God's chosen people, the God haters aren't. Why on earth would you believe God would make God haters any promises other than eternity in hell?No one is claiming that. You are labelling Jews as eternal God haters.
God has promised otherwise. Repeatedly. He will rescue them and they will mourn for him & repent.
People are trying to tell you that our God does not break his promises.
" I swear by myself says Yahweh"
If he broke his promises, our salvation would be worthless.
The TruthThen God lied
Well it couldbeThe terms seed and Christ are interchangeable in how Paul used them concerning that text and the new Jerusalem consists of people who formerly were a mess because of sin. This is something any grown up Christian shouldn't be confused about or have to have explained to them.