Reduce Population, Harris says

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
ResidentAlien said:
But you have to prove a link between these things and a plot to cull the herd. Anything less is paranoia.
Click to expand...
I didn't say there was a plot. I simply posted some ideas on how someone who had the idea to reduce the population could possibly go about it. It just happens to be some things that the powers that be who have it in their mind to reduce the population are actually doing. That don't make it a plot. that makes it a convenient coincidence.
 
Another thing that a group or polity could do to reduce population would be too foment hatred and violence between different classes and races of people.
They could also instigate Wars in places where may consider the natural resources as valuable but the people not so much
 
If you have listened to the recording, you will know that pollution actually fits better into her message than does population. The next statement she makes is about health.

I'm not saying there aren't those who would like to get rid of the resource devourers. I'm saying the clear meaning of her statements is better understood with the word pollution, and not population.
 
Locoponydirtman said:
I didn't say there was a plot. I simply posted some ideas on how someone who had the idea to reduce the population could possibly go about it. It just happens to be some things that the powers that be who have it in their mind to reduce the population are actually doing. That don't make it a plot. that makes it a convenient coincidence.
Click to expand...

That's right you didn't say plot, I did..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Locoponydirtman
Cameron143 said:
If you have listened to the recording, you will know that pollution actually fits better into her message than does population. The next statement she makes is about health.

I'm not saying there aren't those who would like to get rid of the resource devourers. I'm saying the clear meaning of her statements is better understood with the word pollution, and not population.
Click to expand...
Trying to extrapolate any meaning from her incoherent rambling is merely an exercise of speculation. I doubt she even knows what She intended to say
 
Psychopathic policy initiatives

Well she is right, if we were to reduce population then more of her children could breathe clean air and drink clean water.

Now you couldn't have a negligible drop, it would have to be a very significant drop in population. I think this would be most noticeable in the slums of the world.

But the question I have is who is she referring to by "our children"? Is that simply the children of the elites? That really is the only thing that makes sense mathematically because if you were to reduce population evenly you would have less of "our children" not more.

But if you eliminated all the poor below a certain threshold, say a third of the world's population then it would be true that more of the elite's children could breath clean air and drink clean water.
 
Cameron143 said:
That's generally a fair point but I've heard the audio of this severa times, and what I posted is accurate.
Click to expand...
I was trying to make a bit of a joke.
i guess it wasnt funny. Which is why Im a mechanic and not a comedian.
 
Cameron143 said:
If you have listened to the recording, you will know that pollution actually fits better into her message than does population. The next statement she makes is about health.

I'm not saying there aren't those who would like to get rid of the resource devourers. I'm saying the clear meaning of her statements is better understood with the word pollution, and not population.
Click to expand...
Let's stop trying to twist Kamala's words

But if you substitute pollution then the statement is no longer true. Investing in electric vehicles means batteries and they are very toxic as well as destructive to the environment. If you invest in the things she is talking about you will increase pollution, not decrease it. But if you invest in them while also reducing population, then you can have the best of both worlds. The rich can drive around in their electric cars talking about how great they are and at the same time you could clean up the air and water by killing all those who cannot afford to buy those things.
 
ZNP said:
Let's stop trying to twist Kamala's words

But if you substitute pollution then the statement is no longer true. Investing in electric vehicles means batteries and they are very toxic as well as destructive to the environment. If you invest in the things she is talking about you will increase pollution, not decrease it. But if you invest in them while also reducing population, then you can have the best of both worlds. The rich can drive around in their electric cars talking about how great they are and at the same time you could clean up the air and water by killing all those who cannot afford to buy those things.
Click to expand...
It's a fair point in reality. But hers was a matrix message.
 
tourist said:
Apparently, it's their 'final solution'. Actually, Ebenezer Scrooge once said that the surplus population must be gotten rid of. Of course, that was said in a piece of fiction.
Click to expand...
That
tourist said:
Apparently, it's their 'final solution'. Actually, Ebenezer Scrooge once said that the surplus population must be gotten rid of. Of course, that was said in a piece of fiction.
Click to expand...
Didn't know that.
That shows how Charles Dickens must have seen the same demonic attitude in wealthy misers of his day too. That's something I didn't know or remember by watching it on TV as a boy.

Pride and evolution seems a common attitude and religious view in those who tried to teach me that as a young person. They saw themselves as upper crust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
Cameron143 said:
She says inane things on a regular basis. Here she simply misspoke.
Click to expand...
Nope. I refuse to allow the President or Vice President while reading a prepared speech to later say "I misspoke". You can correct yourself immediately otherwise it was very clear what she was saying. They know that most people will be gullible enough to buy a correction being put out, but just like Trump saying "tippy top" was a signal that he was working with Q, that was a warning that they were ready to annihilate any country that opposes us. We are about to see WW3, it will be nuclear, and she is blithely talking about reducing population. That is who she is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Genipher
ZNP said:
Nope. I refuse to allow the President or Vice President while reading a prepared speech to later say "I misspoke". You can correct yourself immediately otherwise it was very clear what she was saying. They know that most people will be gullible enough to buy a correction being put out, but just like Trump saying "tippy top" was a signal that he was working with Q, that was a warning that they were ready to annihilate any country that opposes us. We are about to see WW3, it will be nuclear, and she is blithely talking about reducing population. That is who she is.
Click to expand...
Your missing my point. The word pollution actually fit what she was saying better than population. And people who speak alot make mistakes regularly. A healthy mistrust of government figures is healthy and necessary, but every rock isn't concealing something. Such thinking allows the other side to think we're as deranged as they are.
 
Cameron143 said:
Your missing my point. The word pollution actually fit what she was saying better than population. And people who speak alot make mistakes regularly. A healthy mistrust of government figures is healthy and necessary, but every rock isn't concealing something. Such thinking allows the other side think we're as deranged as they are.
Click to expand...
Sun Tzu said you do not underestimate your enemy. I think it is very clear that Biden and Harris are enemies of the US and I do not underestimate them.

Everyone else likes to portray Biden as demented and Harris as stupider than a kindergarten kid.

They do what they are told, they are puppets on a string, and the guy pulling the strings is no fool which is why all the Democrats are doing whatever they are told.
 
ZNP said:
Sun Tzu said you do not underestimate your enemy. I think it is very clear that Biden and Harris are enemies of the US and I do not underestimate them.

Everyone else likes to portray Biden as demented and Harris as stupider than a kindergarten kid.

They do what they are told, they are puppets on a string, and the guy pulling the strings is no fool which is why all the Democrats are doing whatever they are told.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree with any of this. But sometimes people make mistakes. To err is human.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back