One other thing sir, here is one other resource that you might want to look into. It is a good article defending the pre-trib. Rapture. Very precise and detailed.
The Pre-Tribulation Rapture | Doctrine
I read the article and here are the problems with it that I see:
1. "Caught up" and taken to heaven are two completely different concepts. If we are to be "gathered" at the 7th trumpet and given glorified bodies and assembled in Jerusalem with Jesus it makes sense to be "caught up" in the air as opposed to being transported rapidly across the ground.
2. Why would the Lord bring down all the saints from heaven to be joined with those alive just to take them back to heaven? Why not just leave them there and bring those of us alive up to heaven? Seems foolish to do that just to return a few years later.
3. The "hope and comfort" which the author insists proves a rapture is so misplaced. The hope and comfort is that we will be resurrected and have eternal life and not sleep without hope. Go back to 1 Thes 4:13. This is the central theme of the whole passage!!!
But I do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who have fallen asleep, lest you sorrow as others who have no hope.
4. No timing is given in 1 Thes 4. Paul then writes 2 Thes 2 to clarify the timing because the Thessalonians were concerned that they missed the Lord's return. This is how you "Rightly Divide" the Word - by understanding the context, not by applying some man-made dispensational teaching to actually alter the clear reading of the Word. If you can't get this simple fact Brother Chosen, you will remain lost.
5. The Rapture does NOT come before the Day of the Lord's wrath. 1 Thes 5 isn't saying that!! It says we are to watch so that were are:
"not in darkness, so that this Day should overtake you as a thief." If we are to be raptured, there would be no need to watch BECAUSE WE WON'T BE HERE!!
"For God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ."
The above has NOTHING to do with Tribulation wrath. First Paul wrote this in AD 51 about 40 years before John was ever given his visions. Paul was long dead and gone so he could not be discussing the 7 Bowls of God's wrath which incidentally are poured out on the beast and his kingdom, not the whole earth. Paul was discussing specifically final judgment wrath.
6. 1 Cor 15 was written around AD 56. No TIMING of the rapture is given here. Why, because Paul already gave the timing 4 years earlier in 2 Thes. No distinction was made between this event and any other supposed returning - why? Because there is only one SECOND COMING.
7. The saying that the Church has a different trump from the ones in Revelation have no basis in scripture. The writer tells us:
"The church’s last trump is when she shall finally be congregated together to the Lord (1 Th. 4:17). Compare Numbers 10:7"
Yet 3 paragraphs earlier he tells us:
"1. The Rapture is a mystery that was not revealed in the Old Testament prophecies (1 Cor. 15:51)."
Why compare OT and NT trumpets if the OT has nothing to do with the Church in the NT? Revelation is however in the NT so those trumpets would be germane to the discussion.
8. The writer than goes on to say the following direct quote!!
The Time of the Rapture
NOTE TO TEACHERS: The following section can be omitted if there is a shortage of time to teach this course. Or you might want to hit the highlights of the following study by way of review and amplification of what has already been taught on the Rapture.
UNBELIEVABLE!!! It sure doesn't sound like he's very sure about the timing. He then goes on to summarize why he feels the timing is pre-trib. Basically he cites all the things Chosen and others cite. But none of them ever cite a verse that clearly states the timing is pre-Trib, or that there are two separate returns of Christ or that the Church is clearly in heaven. They take various passages, interpret them wrong, take them out of context then argue that when considered as a whole, there must be a rapture of the church BEFORE the Tribulation. Some of these people even have to gall to boast that they practice "sound doctrine."
This is a two part reply...