It will be unpleasant at times.....This discourse has been so unpleasant, I don't care anymore.
![]()
It will be unpleasant at times.....This discourse has been so unpleasant, I don't care anymore.
![]()
I don't blame you.This discourse has been so unpleasant, I don't care anymore.
![]()
We should just get this straightened out then:
lust /lÅst/ (from The American Heritage Dictionary)
noun
It just depends on word usage and I think Bob meant it as definition #3.
- Intense sexual desire.
- An overwhelming desire or craving.
"a lust for power."- Intense eagerness or enthusiasm.
"a lust for life."
With that said, I agree with you that Jesus doesn't lust in His heart in the sense of definition #1 - having intense sexual desire, or definition #2 - having idolatrous desire or craving. He always had self-control which He exhibited all throughout the gospels. He won't ever allow lust to overtake Him!
![]()
That's to say that Jesus NEVER ALLOWED HIS LUST TO CONCEIVE (the language is sexual) "Conception" will result in a birth - in this case a "Birth" of SINFUL ACTIONS (James 1:5). It's clear that Jesus experienced "Temptations" Just like us - which would include Sexual temptation (He was a human MAN, after all), and the devil hit Him with HUNGER (when he'd been told to fast), Reputation (prove who he was by Popular demonstration), and POWER (Adam's dominance that satan has appropriated). soi while Jesus "Lusted" in the James 1 sense, he remained SIN FREE - so that He could be the perfect sacrifice.
Jesus' temptations parallel Eve's temptations in the garden.
And I am still unclear about whether you consider that A&E actually fell after sinning.
It's clear that they BECAME SINNERS, and fell short of God's glory - just like you and I did.
Thank you for clarifying, Bob. I do know the verses to which you refer, and I have what I call my shadow man panel with them on it, but it still seems to me that since people are born by nature children of wrath, which was inherited from Adam and Eve, that something must have changed, especially since those words, by nature, are explicitly stated. Surely you do not think A and E were by nature children of wrath prior to sinning? By the way, I have never said they were cursed. Just clarifying that point...It's clear that they BECAME SINNERS, and fell short of God's glory - just like you and I did. Theologically, theres the HERESY that Adam, and Eve's NATURE changed. That's in error since they were created with the SAME HUMAN NATURE that you and I have, and that never changed. James 1 explains the process of temptation. You, I, and Eve / Adam allowed our temptation to "Conceive". Jesus didn't.
Simple as that.
There's no argument that Adam's ENVIRONMENT changed - became subject to "Vanity" since the ground was CURSED (for his sake). but Adam and Eve WERE NEVER CURSED - they only became Sinners as the result of their SIN.
Thank you for clarifying, Bob. I do know the verses to which you refer, and I have what I call my shadow man panel with them on it, but it still seems to me that since people are born by nature children of wrath, which was inherited from Adam and Eve, that something must have changed, especially since those words, by nature, are explicitly stated. Surely you do not think A and E were by nature children of wrath prior to sinning? By the way, I have never said they were cursed. Just clarifying that point...
SUrely you do not think A and E were by nature children of wrath prior to sinning?