You might want to read Luke 16.
If you are referring to the rich man & Lazarus portion, Luke 16 proves his point. Soul sleep isn't a biblical teaching.
You might want to read Luke 16.
Hades as in the grave or a place of punishment?Before Christ's resurrection, all souls (saved and unsaved) went to Hades.
Is not the Greek word there "Hades"?
"Hades is Greek mythology."? How does the correct word "hades" denote Greek mythology?
I suspect you are a KJVonlyist. Would you care to confirm or deny this?
the account is a metaphor, I don't know what can be gleaned from it on the subject being discussed.
Proudly, yes. I believe God has preserved his words in English through the KJV. Do you have a bible you can trust every word? Or do you rely on your own education?
Proudly, yes. I believe God has preserved his words in English through the KJV. Do you have a bible you can trust every word? Or do you rely on your own education?
Using another parable for example, such as the wheat and tares one, no one actually sowed any wheat, or tares. The wheat and tares are 'comparable' to believers and unbelievers to teach about the reality of the present conditions in anticipation of 'the harvest.' And the parable of the talents, no one actually gave three people 5, 2, and 1 talent and then went away. This is a lesson in investing in the Word, the dividends of the Gospel. So the rich man, in the parable, didn't actually go to hell and wish he could return and tell his brothers about it, it is a lesson about it being too late, after you die, to do, say, or offer any excuse about how you lived.
Lazarus died in 'abraham's bosom,' that is, with the heart of faith.
The rich man died lost forever.
If you are referring to the rich man & Lazarus portion, Luke 16 proves his point. Soul sleep isn't a biblical teaching.
Hades as in the grave or a place of punishment?
Hades as in the grave or a place of punishment?
Hades as in the grave or a place of punishment?
I CERTAINLY don't trust my "education".
As for trusting every word in any given Bible, emphatically NO. The KJV is what I currently use, but even that I try to treat with caution, not because of fear of error, primarily, but wariness I'll misinterpret something. I certainly wouldn't consult any other Bible I'm aware of to settle doctrine.
You're probably aware of the fact that it's in dispute as to whether the KJV is divinely inspired and/ or fallible. I don't know much about the translating process of Bibles. Many people, eg, James White, sees the KJV as a good, but not infallible, translation.
He seems very knowledgeable about the original textual references, the details of which I can't do justice. In the off chance you'd be interested in finding videos on his take on this subject, I think he'd be easy to find under "Dr. James White - Bible translations".
BTW - I don't know if your familiar with Pastor Steven Anderson. I suspect you are!
If you like to comment on any of these, or other issue(s), I'd be happy to hear from you, but don't feel pressured to respond.
Interesting!Your post reminded me….
One day while reading about the miracle of God using the 2 fish and 5 loaves of bread to feed 5,000 people…. I asked God, “How did You do that? It happened in the physical realm so there must be some kind of physical law that You manipulated… what was it? How did you do it?”
He did not answer me until a month later, I was reading about creation and seed, time and harvest… and how all the plants and herbs had seed within them…
BINGO! Understanding came!
The 2 fish - one was female and one was male… God took their seed, manipulated time and created a harvest of fish!!!
In other words, God took those 2 fish back in time to when they were alive, mated them which created more fish then took those more fish forward in time and kept mating them which created more fish, then gathered all the fish and brought them back to the time and had plenty of fish to feed 5,000 people and 12 baskets of leftovers.
It’s the same principle with the 5 loaves… seed, time, and harvest… all brought back to the same time.
Only God controls and manipulates time.
Then, God showed me something I did not even ask about…. How did the Israelites sandals never wear out for 40 years in the desert?
Even though the Israelites were existing in Time, God took there sandals out of Time so that their sandals never changed, their sandals remained the same.
God is amazing!! Full of wonder, wisdom and awe!!!
Ask Him questions!!! He desires to share all He knows with us!
Do you believe, in light of how you've interpreted the Lazarus account, that this does not indicate, at least in itself, that consciousness exists in the post-death/ pre-second coming state?
Another point:- I don't know if the situation is clouded by the fact that Jesus seems to be referencing a pre-Christian state, but - In the conversation between the rich man and God/ Abraham, when an explanation is given as to why the rich man was where he was and suffering, it seems to be, effectively "You were rich and callous to the poor and needy", rather than "you are a sinner and failed to avail yourself of God's plan of salvation".
That seems to me strange in light of Christ's consistent message.
1. As I noted it is only the saints who have passed on (are deceased) who are now in Heaven. Their souls and spirits are in Heaven, but they have yet to receive their glorified bodies.
2. Seven years (or more) later Christ returns WITH all His saints and angels at His Second Coming. This is when He comes as King of kings and Lord of lords.
3. After that Christ establishes His Millennial Kingdom on Earth (while Satan is bound).
I don't follow Anderson. Our beliefs do not match. Question, when you come across a suspected error in your study, how do you determine what is the correct word?
LOL, I've listened to James White bash the KJV for years with his so called contradictions. All can be and have been refuted.
I can't say I have a consistent method of determining which is likely correct. I guess I'd look at the Greek, of which I'm no expert, maybe consult what people who seem to be knowledgeable on the subject say. Compare scripture with Scripture.