You read it. In the Hebrew form, “Father” is not listed. It only states “everlasting”. I do not contest Yeshua is deity, nor that He existed before He was born in the flesh. He and the Father existed together, separately. Elohim means gods, plural. It is always different when expressing God as One. It’s clearly what the Bible states without men adding meaning to it. If it wasn’t for God blessing me with understanding, wisdom and knowledge I probably would be stumbling in the dark following blind guides. May the Eternal Father bless you. I know you are speaking to me as a brother in an effort to lead me to the truth. The Lord has guided me and I see where man has gone astray.
Allow me once more to say to you, borrowing your adverb, kpoint blank, Isaiah was given by the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit what to write, and he, from our Maker, teaches us tThey are One. Do not make it me saying it, for I have shared what our Father says on the subject. If this is not good enough for you, please do not try to make it something a man has dreamed up. It is from our El, or, Elohanu.Let me just ask you point blank jaumel, are you saying that Jesus Christ who is the subject of Isaiah 9:6 the person of God the Father?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Allow me once more to say to you, borrowing your adverb, kpoint blank, Isaiah was given by the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit what to write, and he, from our Maker, teaches us tThey are One. Do not make it me saying it, for I have shared what our Father says on the subject. If this is not good enough for you, please do not try to make it something a man has dreamed up. It is from our El, or, Elohanu.
If you said "I AM" a plumber, it means YOU are a plumber. (Assuming you are being truthful)If I write, or say, “I am a plumber,” to you, does this mean I am calling Jehovah a plumber? Perhaps Christ was just using, “I am...” in its proper tense and not addressing Himself as the Great I Am in many of the references you chose. Regardless, I would have just ignored your post if it wasn’t so obviously far reaching. Like I said believe what you want.
Did you know the Queen of England is Commander of the Canadian Forces, the Duke of Lancaster, and Head of the New Zealand Defence Force as well as being Queen of England. She is four persons in one. Yet she is ONE Queen.Let me just ask you point blank jaumel, are you saying that Jesus Christ who is the subject of Isaiah 9:6 the person of God the Father?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Abi I’m assuming is “father”? When I looked it up I found only Abba is father but abi, is up for debate. Regardless when I looked up the passage in Strongs Bible taken from the original text, it merely identifies that abi identifies that it is masculine, completely omitting that it means father. If one debated phrase can cement it in your mind that The Christ is the Father, then good for you. It just doesn’t make any sense to me. Christ told us to pray to the Father, that He will sit at His right hand, that He will advocate on our behalf to the Father. As well, Yeshua prayed to the Father, the Father spoke stating Yeshua was His Son. It makes abundantly more sense that they are separate. Believe what you want, I will do the same.You are in error. Read te above.
5 For a child is born unto us, a son is given unto us; and the government is upon his shoulder; and his name is called Pele-joez-el-gibbor-Abi-ad-sar-shalom;
I was showing you your logic, which I agree is nonsensical.If you said "I AM" a plumber, it means YOU are a plumber. (Assuming you are being truthful)
Jesus said He was the I AM. That means he IS the I AM. Moses spoke to Him years earlier. God is eternal and omnipresent.
Your logic is nonsensical.
Allow me to paraphrase with understanding given me. Long before Jesus in the flesh, in the very beginning, was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. hE IS OUR Father.Ok, how are they one? According to Isaiah 9:6 are they one and the same person or are they one in nature?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
If it is Hebrew you want:Abi I’m assuming is “father”? When I looked it up I found only Abba is father but abi, is up for debate. Regardless when I looked up the passage in Strongs Bible taken from the original text, it merely identifies that abi identifies that it is masculine, completely omitting that it means father. If one debated phrase can cement it in your mind that The Christ is the Father, then good for you. It just doesn’t make any sense to me. Christ told us to pray to the Father, that He will sit at His right hand, that He will advocate on our behalf to the Father. As well, Yeshua prayed to the Father, the Father spoke stating Yeshua was His Son. It makes abundantly more sense that they are separate. Believe what you want, I will do the same.
Ab may be father, Abinu is our father, avi is my father, avo his father, and so forth.Abi I’m assuming is “father”? When I looked it up I found only Abba is father but abi, is up for debate. Regardless when I looked up the passage in Strongs Bible taken from the original text, it merely identifies that abi identifies that it is masculine, completely omitting that it means father. If one debated phrase can cement it in your mind that The Christ is the Father, then good for you. It just doesn’t make any sense to me. Christ told us to pray to the Father, that He will sit at His right hand, that He will advocate on our behalf to the Father. As well, Yeshua prayed to the Father, the Father spoke stating Yeshua was His Son. It makes abundantly more sense that they are separate. Believe what you want, I will do the same.
Could it be used in a figurative or poetic sense like Tesla was the father of AC electricity, or Abraham is the father of our faith? Could it be a form used as a patriarch? Or, in this sense must it be used to clearly label the Almighty Father? Thanks for taking the time to educate me. Still I feel in this instance it is being linked because of confirmation bias. There is just too much evidence to the contrary. I really must get back to my chores though. I will surely pray for clarity. If I have anymore questions it is nice to see we have such educated linguists on site. Shalom!Ab may be father, Abinu is our father, avi is my father, avo his father, and so forth.
The possissive forms and nominative forms have changed and evolved over the centuries. I certanly cannot give you detailed delineations of the development of modern nor of biblical Hebrew, but then neither can scholars of Hebrew nor rabbis for many words' definitions have been lost over the centuries. Glad to share what I know but you should at bes look up a noun you are saying you are explaining when you do not know the varied forms, posssessive in this instance.
If Jesus is the Father, then why this brother...Ab may be father, Abinu is our father, avi is my father, avo his father, and so forth.
The possissive forms and nominative forms have changed and evolved over the centuries. I certanly cannot give you detailed delineations of the development of modern nor of biblical Hebrew, but then neither can scholars of Hebrew nor rabbis for many words' definitions have been lost over the centuries. Glad to share what I know but you should at bes look up a noun you are saying you are explaining when you do not know the varied forms, posssessive in this instance.
I believe my previous post explaisn my understanding, which I truly believe has been given to me. I could never make up the above.Allow me to paraphrase with understanding given me. Long before Jesus in the flesh, in the very beginning, was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. hE IS OUR Father.
When He created all that we see and rested on the Seventh Day, He gave us His day of rest as a gift, forever.
Later we, mankind, turned away from the Maker to those things made by Him. Mankind was put through a lot of trials and tribulation b his own covetness unti God came down to us, Himself, in our form in order that we might discover how to pleas Him, and in so doing find joy and glory for ourselves in Salvation and being with our Father foreve in Heaven, that is our Eternal Father.
When He was with us in fhe ¨Flesh He was just as we are, and He was tempted with all the temptations that ever were or will be and resisted them all, just so we would know directly from God that our Maker is trustworhty and true..
Jesus, being "just a man" as all flesh did have one thing we do not or did not, and that is true knowledge of the Father and all He is, but without actually being God, yet He was god come down to save us. As He told the people after He was brought back, the firstborn, of the dead, His Body was not yet glorified, and after forty days He ascended back to the Father.
Now do not be alarmed that He is now One with the Father and the Holy Spirit for in the OT Yahweh declared He is our Husband, He is our Redeemer, and He is our King.
Yes the Son is the Father come down to save us, bust while He was yet in the flesh, for He had to be like us in order for men to give Him the glory and credit of being a true judge, He was not God, yet at the sametime He was God in the flesh.
Just as we are members of His Body, so He was the same of the Father.
In the OT God declares His Arm is not shortened that It cannot save." This Arm of the Father is Jesus with us, and now is back to the Right Hand of our Father, King and God forever.
The sacrifice the Father did for you and for me is incredibly great, too great to measure. Please If you do not read all of this, do not reply to it, for I believe it is very important to all and glorifies our King. All glory to Jesus, Yeshua, our Savior and God,amen.
If Jesus is the Father, then why this brother...
Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death. For "God has put all things in subjection under his feet." But when it says, "all things are put in subjection," it is plain that he is excepted who put all things in subjection under him. When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all.
1 Corinthians 15:24-28 ESV
Help me understand your line of thinking. I mean no disrespect in asking.
Sorry, I forgot to include your post. god bless you always.I believe my previous post explaisn my understanding, which I truly believe has been given to me. I could never make up the above.
If Jesus is the Father, then why this brother...
Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death. For "God has put all things in subjection under his feet." But when it says, "all things are put in subjection," it is plain that he is excepted who put all things in subjection under him. When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all.
1 Corinthians 15:24-28 ESV
Help me understand your line of thinking. I mean no disrespect in asking.
Just my opinion again, if I may. I do not see how Father and Son can be one in nature because the Father is Spirit while the Son is flesh in whom dwells the Spirit of the Father. They are ONE imo because they are of the same Spirit.Ok, how are they one? According to Isaiah 9:6 are they one and the same person or are they one in nature?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
And although they killed the flesh, they can never kill the Spirit that dwelt, or was present, in Him.Here is a thought. Jesus had to die for my sins. In order to do this, He was not God when He did it but a man of flesh just as I.
Yet, now He is God forever King, and our Salvation. Nothinsg that is now was not made by Him. He is God…………..