I don't have a problem with the word. You appear to have a problem when a woman doesn't agree she's suppose to be a submissive in her marriage.
I do not like to see anyone, male or female, disagree with the Bible.
I don't have a problem with the word. You appear to have a problem when a woman doesn't agree she's suppose to be a submissive in her marriage.
A wise man does not chose a foolish woman and vise versa. That being said life does not always work that way..
Is Jesus a doormat?
• 1Cor 15:27-28 . . God, the Father, has put everything under his feet. Now
when it says that "everything" has been put under him, it is clear that this
does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ.
. . .When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to Him
who put everything under him
While easy enough to prove that women weren't created to be a man's
doormat, it is just as easy to prove that women were created to aid their
husband rather than make demands upon him for equality.
Rivalry is a very dangerous sin. It got Abel murdered by his elder brother, it
got Jesus murdered by his countrymen, and it sours marriages; turning
them into cold wars instead of homes.
• Prov 14:1 . .The wise woman builds her house, but the foolish tears it
down with her own hands.
_
Children are to obey their masters.
Chill, Ice...Parents are not a child's master! Is it that way in your house? You are the master of your children?
All of it?I do not like to see anyone, male or female, disagree with the Bible.
Yes, I didn't catch that until I read your message. Children are to obey their parents. Paul said slaves are to obey their masters.Chill, Ice...
It was probably a typo - I am pretty sure he meant to say 'parents'.
Agree. That is the New and Better Way...I don’t think our gender makes any difference to God since Christ came to teach us the truth.
God is seriously thinking of putting you there.He's trolling for chicks at Johnson's School for the Mute
Is Paul condoning slavery?Yes, I didn't catch that until I read your message. Children are to obey their parents. Paul said slaves are to obey their masters.
He tried to get some of them free, but He did not make a big political scene about it.Is Paul condoning slavery?
In a sense, we are all slaves to someone... no one is totally free except for Jesus and Donald T.Yes, I didn't catch that until I read your message. Children are to obey their parents. Paul said slaves are to obey their masters.
Is Paul condoning slavery?
He did not write in opposition to it and told slaves to obey their masters. The Torah allowed slavery. He did try to get Onesimus freed, apparently.Is Paul condoning slavery?
He did not write in opposition to it and told slaves to obey their masters. The Torah allowed slavery. He did try to get Onesimus freed, apparently.
Paul described himself as a bondservant to Christ. If there had never been slavery, we might not have understood that concept.slavery has been a part of creation because of mankind’s response to Satan in the beginning and still exists today. We often forget that God gave man the earth to rule over , so all the foul things like slavery and every form of bondage like sin , is something man has caused and partaken of.
“The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.”
Psalm 115:16 KJV
“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.”
Genesis 1:26 KJV
Our dominion being corrupt at heart is the issue and has always been the issue since we let Satan into our hearts and minds in the beginning. It’s why rather than just taking mans dominion away it’s going to be utterly destroyed and a new one will appear where Christ has all dominion there won’t be slavery then because our corrupt will won’t be ruling and christs Will will be what governs eternity
Paul described himself as a bondservant to Christ. If there had never been slavery, we might not have understood that concept.
We may always be slaves to Christ. If I had to guess, I would think there might not be slavery in the age to come, except being servants of Christ and His Father.
But I don't believe American or western social political philosophy is a valid basis for doctrine, so I don't say that Philemon, Isaac, Abraham.....or Christ.... sinned by having slaves.
It is apparent that while slavery is obviously evil Paul did not write to condemn it, but merely commented on it.He did not write in opposition to it and told slaves to obey their masters. The Torah allowed slavery. He did try to get Onesimus freed, apparently.
I see obedience demanded in a woman throughout the Bible. It is in the Qur'an Surah 4:34. Do these works call for absolute obedience, or is there a burden on the male also to not be overbearing and mean?
If you apply this to marriage tell women not to submit to their husbands, not only does that promote rebellion, but it also can discourage them from experiencing the mystery of Christ and the church in their marriage.It is apparent that while slavery is obviously evil Paul did not write to condemn it, but merely commented on it.
Paul said that he did not permit women to speak in church or have authority over men.
Just based on the slavery reference I believe that Paul, in regards to women, as with the slavery issue as well, was speaking to a certain culture, tradition, and religious practice that existed at that time. Since slavery is obviously not condoned at this day and age it seems that the restrictions that Paul placed on women no longer apply either.
Paul said that he does not permit, he did not say that God does not permit. That is an important distinction that changes the entire dynamic in regards to what is or is not permissible in a church setting in regards to women.