It depends. The nudes in the Sistine Chapel do not illicit arousal like pornography, The David statue is a seminal piece of art, and so forth.
It depends on the spirit of the artist. I have seen Venus de Milo or Bare Breasted Justice (French) and there is nothing erotic about them. But I have seen Venus paintings that have her beckoning to her bed in art class and Donatello’s David feels very homo-erotic to me in its style.
Ultimately, it depends on if it makes you stumble. If it does, stay away.
I personally do not gravitate to nude art, even the masterpieces I mentioned. I prefer Impressionism (Van Gogh), Realism (Rembrandt), and fully clothed people in art.
I will say the line between erotic/porn and expressing the beauty of the body God has made is a fine line and it usually is easy to tell by how artist poured their intent into the piece.
It depends on the spirit of the artist. I have seen Venus de Milo or Bare Breasted Justice (French) and there is nothing erotic about them. But I have seen Venus paintings that have her beckoning to her bed in art class and Donatello’s David feels very homo-erotic to me in its style.
Ultimately, it depends on if it makes you stumble. If it does, stay away.
I personally do not gravitate to nude art, even the masterpieces I mentioned. I prefer Impressionism (Van Gogh), Realism (Rembrandt), and fully clothed people in art.
I will say the line between erotic/porn and expressing the beauty of the body God has made is a fine line and it usually is easy to tell by how artist poured their intent into the piece.
-
1
- Show all