What's the point of sacrifice for forgiveness if no sin is present?timed out...152,747
...sacrifice for forgiveness is not available with sin present.
You are wrong...study scriptures.
What's the point of sacrifice for forgiveness if no sin is present?timed out...152,747
...sacrifice for forgiveness is not available with sin present.
You are wrong...study scriptures.
You have to read all the pages before you start posting here.7,639 pages!
This thread has been around for a while!
This forum must be older than me.
It's a good topic when it's not about our good works.![]()
Ellen White was a co-founder of SDA; much of their theology is based on her writings (more than 5,000 periodical articles and 40 books), most significantly what is known as the great controversy. She claimed to have received over 2,000 visions and dreams from God, and Walter Martin described her as "one of the most fascinating and controversial personages ever to appear upon the horizon of religious history." She taught that Jesus was the archangel Michael. She is also considered a leading figure in American vegetarian history. wiki
Let me guess.
What's the point of sacrifice for forgiveness if no sin is present?
One guy joined the conversation once and within about an hour told us he had read everything
Seems you are assuming those who don't endure were saved.
1 Peter 1:3-5
Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His abundant mercy has begotten us again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled and that does not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are kept by the power of God through faith for salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
isn't it those who are not kept by the power of God who fail to endure?
So is anyone who is saved not kept by the power of God?
Do they call all those kinds of service SACRIFICE for Forgiveness?GRANPA, I am 73 and getting older buy the minute.
You need to do more study on Judaism. They call all kinds of service SACRIFIC, not just for sins.
I assume that is the main purpose for the TWO WITNESSES in Revelation, is to teach them that JESUS is their MESSIAH TOO.
Do they call all those kinds of service SACRIFICE for Forgiveness?
Or is it just understood that all Sacrifice is for Forgiveness?
Do they call all those kinds of service SACRIFICE for Forgiveness?
Or is it just understood that all Sacrifice is for Forgiveness?
Please excuse me for asking, but what does this mean?Speaking of sacrifice on the cross..Christ death a resurrection.g/Deate
There are still KJV only people that think the KJV is only Authorized Translation of the Bible. Here is a Post that I wrote a verse long time ago. Words in Blue Print are my comments, Black and Fusia come straight out of the 1611 KJV PREFACE:
KJV ONLY IS A PARAPHASE VERSION, Not a Translation.
No offense intended, but it appears to me you have been Led astray by a handful of KJV ONLY zealots who believe they must HAVE Faith in the KJV Bible, no matter how many Errors it leads you into. I have told you the Truth on all subject of KJV was only a Paraphase of 5 older English Versions. You will not listen or even read something that comes from another version, thinking KJV is the Authorized Translation. How come there were at least five other ENGLISH Translations, before the KJV. So how come you are not faithful to one of them ? ? ? You do not even know this, but I was once a KJV believer. I woke up when I first saw what the Translators actually said about their own VERISON. I know some of my words will be Shocking to an actual KJV ONLY BELIEVER. It is my personal Opinion, but that most KJV ONLY believers, have PUT the KJV BIBLE WAY TO HIGH ON THE PEDISTAL, it was only intended to be a Paraphase, UPDATING the Language, the 1611 Translation Team said so.
revising that which hath bene laboured by others, . . . {That is a Paraphrase, and not an actual Translation.}
But how shall men meditate in that, which they cannot understand? {That is a prescription for replacing a Know Error for Another.}
the Seventy Interpreters, . . . among the Gentiles by written ERRORS preaching . . . {That is more proof that Errors still exist in the KJV.}
the Seventie were Interpreters, they were not Prophets; they did many things well, as learned men; but yet as men they stumbled and fell, one while through oversight, another while through ignorance, yea, sometimes they may be noted to adde to the Originall, and sometimes to take from it; {That accounts for the KNOWN ERRORS, but what about UNKNOWN ERRORS.}
. . . the same will shine as gold more brightly, being rubbed and polished; also, if anything be halting, or superfluous, or not so agreeable to the original, the same may be corrected, and the truth set in place. {KNOWN ERRORS, but they were taken from 5 older BIBLE in English, with Known Errors, Checked with the Septuagint with KNOWN ERRORS, and checked with LATIN BIBLE with KNOW ERRORS. OH MY! No wonder why they were in hurry to REVISE, the ORIGINAL 1611 PREFACE. BUT THERE IS MORE.}
For to whom ever was it imputed for a fault (by such as were wise) to goe over that which hee had done, and to amend it where he saw cause? . . . {That certainly is a genuine Paraphrase and not a Genuine Translation out of an original language Bibles.}
But the difference that appeareth betweene our Translations, and our often correcting of them, is the thing that wee are specially charged with; let us see therefore whether they themselves bee without fault this way, (if it be to be counted a fault, to correct) and whether they bee fit men to throw stones at us: {That SAME supposed ERROR the 1611 Translation TEAM was accused of, is the SAME ERROR modern KJV ONLY believers have discounted nearly EVERY English Genuine Translation, because it in some places contradicts what they falsely believe the KJV is saying, INSTEAD OF WHAT GOD IS ACTUALLY SAYING.}
Truly (good Christian Reader) wee never thought from the beginning, that we should neede to make a new Translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one, . . . but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principall good one, not justly to be excepted against; that hath bene our indeavour, that our marke. . . .
{That makes it a PARAPHRASE and not an actual Translation from the original languages.}
Now that is only the Negative part of the KJV. YES THE KJV IS THE BEST PARAPHRASED VERSION on the market today.
Yes it is true at one time I was well on the way to becoming a KJV ONLY BELIEVER, but I woke up. Pleas read the ORIGINAL 1611 KJV PREFACE, for yourself.
My favorite Translation today is HCSB, followed by NASB, ESV, NKJV, NRSV, ASV, NIV, NCV, RSV, NJB, and YLT.
I have no problem with using any of them.