P
Polar
Guest
I was going to say the same...
I was ready to dive into the book of Job , fearing I had missed something , until I realised he was talking about Lot
...xox...
LOL! I'm sure he meant Lot but just came out Job.
I was going to say the same...
I was ready to dive into the book of Job , fearing I had missed something , until I realised he was talking about Lot
...xox...
a legalist can't see or understand this. they would say you lacked faith.I agree with this because I can relate...
I used to drink , was a drunk when God called me...
I was into my Christian walk three years before I could see what the Holy Spirit was doing in me...
My desire to stop drinking was so strong , but I kept failing , but my drinking was becoming less and less in the times I would give into it...
The Lord delivered me from all alcohol four years ago , today I am clean and sober...
He could of delivered me from drink right away , but then I would never of known His goodness , kindness and mercy through my great struggle...
All the glory to Him I say Amen...
...xox...
I think you mean Lot? but good observations
a legalist can't see or understand this. they would say you lacked faith.
I didn't want to interject when I read what you said.Doh!
Why did I say Job lol
You are correct
Hi.
Interesting point concerning his one defines good works.
Is it what people do and dont do in order to benefit someone else whether Christian or not?
Either could do works of some description for the benefit of someone else without wanting anything in return.
I have seen others say the an unbeliever cannot produce works out love (agape).
Is not agape an "unconditional love that expects nothing in return?
It is not a love of emotion or feeling but an act of the will for the higher good for someone.
So what perplexes me concerning what you say and others that an unbeliever cannot manifest this agape for others because they are not believers.
Cannot unbelievers do things out of agape love without wanting anything in return?
If as a believer I put food in a trolley to help feed those who cannot put food on the table because I don't want people to go hungry and someone else does the same.
We spend our own money, the recipient in this scenario (which is true) does not know who paid for the food.
I am a believer, the other is not.
Is what we done an aspect of Agape?
If so then an unbeliever has walked in agape love?
If not then what was the type of love we expressed?
I am not having a go here just trying to understand why some think this way.
Interesting question, and definition of agape love being unconditional...I have seen others say the an unbeliever cannot produce works out love (agape).
Is not agape an "unconditional love that expects nothing in return?
It is not a love of emotion or feeling but an act of the will for the higher good for someone.
Once again, you've proven yourself incapable of anything by weak arguments - not a single verse in all of Scripture even remotely suggests the wicked can be recipients and demonstrate "agape" toward others. The following Biblical argument irrefutably shows once and for all the wicked can never receive or demonstrate it - one from which you cower fear, refusing to answer:wow your pet argument was blown up years ago but you just can't drop it. agape is the noun form of the verb agapao. fact. no private interpretation of yours can change the facts.
this is the commandment:
"love ((agapao)) one another as I have loved ((agapao)) you"
is Jesus commanding strictly worldly love? your argument suggests He is.
Yes, when Jesus tells Christians "take heed that no man deceive "you" refers to "Jews", right? If your esoteric predecessors were alive today, they'd fully acknowledge you as a textbook example of why they believed allowing the ignorant masses access to the truth would be as careless as placing the proverbial sword in the hands of a child, young Posthuman.furthermore Matthew 24 is strictly about Jews. it is a tribulational context. there are 3 kinds of Jews: unbelieving, Messianic, and remnant. but you aren't mature enough to have such discussions, yet.
Once again, you've proven yourself incapable of anything by weak arguments - not a single verse in all of Scripture even remotely suggests the wicked can be recipients and demonstrate "agape" toward others. The following Biblical argument irrefutably shows once and for all the wicked can never receive or demonstrate it - one from which you cower fear, refusing to answer:
1 John 3:7 KJV plainly says "agape" is demonstrated by happily keeping God's commandments, but Romans 8:7 KJV says the wicked can't keep them even if they wanted to.
Posthuman, can you see from Scripture that only those who happily keep God's commandments can demonstrate 'agape" and that the wicked can't keep God's commandments - neither happily nor reluctantly - even if they wanted to? Can you now see the "many' whose "agape" grows cold and dead, leaving them to wind up lost in the end were once SAINTS in possession of warm, living "agape"? Nope - your pride compels you to cling to a dead faith without works, a dead OSAS doctrine, and a made-up "Jesus" instead of the Jesus of Scripture.
Yes, when Jesus tells Christians "take heed that no man deceive "you" refers to "Jews", right? If your esoteric predecessors were alive today, they'd fully acknowledge you as a textbook example of why they believed allowing the ignorant masses access to the truth would be as careless as placing the proverbial sword in the hands of a child, young Posthuman.
Lot's love had grown cold, his soul being vexed by what he saw.
he did not speak to his sons.
he did not speak to his married daughters, only their husbands.
Lot was saved; Lot is righteous; Lot is saved.
ד DALETHMy soul clings to the dust;
Revive me according to Your word.
I have declared my ways, and You answered me;
Teach me Your statutes.
Make me understand the way of Your precepts;
So shall I meditate on Your wonderful works.
My soul melts from heaviness;
Strengthen me according to Your word.
Remove from me the way of lying,
And grant me Your law graciously.
I have chosen the way of truth;
Your judgments I have laid before me.
I cling to Your testimonies;
O Lord, do not put me to shame!
I will run the course of Your commandments,
For You shall enlarge my heart.is David saved by his works or by his faith?
![]()
Hey Bro!Hi.
Interesting point concerning his one defines good works.
Is it what people do and dont do in order to benefit someone else whether Christian or not?
Either could do works of some description for the benefit of someone else without wanting anything in return.
I have seen others say the an unbeliever cannot produce works out love (agape).
Is not agape an "unconditional love that expects nothing in return?
It is not a love of emotion or feeling but an act of the will for the higher good for someone.
So what perplexes me concerning what you say and others that an unbeliever cannot manifest this agape for others because they are not believers.
Cannot unbelievers do things out of agape love without wanting anything in return?
If as a believer I put food in a trolley to help feed those who cannot put food on the table because I don't want people to go hungry and someone else does the same.
We spend our own money, the recipient in this scenario (which is true) does not know who paid for the food.
I am a believer, the other is not.
Is what we done an aspect of Agape?
If so then an unbeliever has walked in agape love?
If not then what was the type of love we expressed?
I am not having a go here just trying to understand why some think this way.
Paul says people would come and use "grace" as a means to commit sexual perversion, aka "licentiousness". The word has bound up in it the idea of "freedom from natural bounds of sexual purity in order to commit sexual perversion". How else can grace be a means to licentiousness than to claim it is "freedom" to do it? That's exactly what OSAS does: gives "freedom" in the name of grace to live in bondage to sin.unlike some people. I looked up the actual Greek word from which the english word was translated. You can translate it however you wish. I will keep the the word as written.
You own up to nothing because you, by your own words, insist "we can't keep the law". Is that owning up? No! That's making an excuse. We don't pump our chests in self righteousness because we saints know overcoming temptation is only by the indwelling power of Jesus' righteousness -- conversely, those who whine and complain they can't overcome temptation are condemned by their own words as lacking the overcoming power of Jesus. Do you really expect to get away with telling God in the day of Judgment, "No one can keep the law" with Daniel and his three friends standing there in front of you?OSAS is not a license to sin, get off your high horse strawman.
We own up to your sins while you deny yours and pump your chest as a self righteous pharisee thanking God your not like the people who have faith in God and his promise..
your the one excusing your sin
Yes, there are licentious people. Jude condemned them to hell. James spoke of them, as CLAIMING to ave faith.Paul says people would come and use "grace" as a means to commit sexual perversion, aka "licentiousness". The word has bound up in it the idea of "freedom from natural bounds of sexual purity in order to commit sexual perversion". How else can grace be a means to licentiousness than to claim it is "freedom" to do it? That's exactly what OSAS does: gives "freedom" in the name of grace to live in bondage to sin.
You own up to nothing because you, by your own words, insist "we can't keep the law". Is that owning up? No! That's making an excuse. We don't pump our chests in self righteousness because we saints know overcoming temptation is only by the indwelling power of Jesus' righteousness -- conversely, those who whine and complain they can't overcome temptation are condemned by their own words as lacking the overcoming power of Jesus. Do you really expect to get away with telling God in the day of Judgment, "No one can keep the law" with Daniel and his three friends standing there in front of you?
The reason you keep saying there's not activity on Sabbath is because you're so Biblically ignorant. Isaiah plainly says the Sabbath is to be a time of corporate worship, doing Godly things, speaking Godly words, fellowship, breaking bread, etc.Ritual physical inactivity is ceremonial.
Physical sabbath observation is not moral, it's ceremonial - just like circumcision, and just like the Lord's supper or baptism. These are rites, not ethical precepts.
Paul says people would come and use "grace" as a means to commit sexual perversion, aka "licentiousness". The word has bound up in it the idea of "freedom from natural bounds of sexual purity in order to commit sexual perversion". How else can grace be a means to licentiousness than to claim it is "freedom" to do it? That's exactly what OSAS does: gives "freedom" in the name of grace to live in bondage to sin.
We can't keep the Law. That is true.You own up to nothing because you, by your own words, insist "we can't keep the law". Is that owning up? No! That's making an excuse. We don't pump our chests in self righteousness because we saints know overcoming temptation is only by the indwelling power of Jesus' righteousness -- conversely, those who whine and complain they can't overcome temptation are condemned by their own words as lacking the overcoming power of Jesus. Do you really expect to get away with telling God in the day of Judgment, "No one can keep the law" with Daniel and his three friends standing there in front of you?
Where does Isaiah say the Sabbath is for corporate worship?The reason you keep saying there's not activity on Sabbath is because you're so Biblically ignorant. Isaiah plainly says the Sabbath is to be a time of corporate worship, doing Godly things, speaking Godly words, fellowship, breaking bread, etc.
What a dull religion you OSAS crowd must endure, constantly whining about how you all can't obey the law as they break it with lip-biting anticipation, looking at your watches with indignation if the preacher goes on for more than an hour...