E
eternally-gratefull
Guest
And when did I say this? Proof?Sooooooo, calling him “preacher of lies” wasn’t calling him a name? Srsly?
And when did I say this? Proof?Sooooooo, calling him “preacher of lies” wasn’t calling him a name? Srsly?
Yet I see no proofThat's one right there. That's what he was doing with me on ignore. There is more.
I didProvide the evidence where I slandered. I'm waiting. You said it is very deep. Should be really easy to find then, so, post it, or, end it.
Own the fact that you, with me on ignore hurled insults, name calling, in a very callow manner.
Right? Own it and be a man.
The proof is there, very easy to find, others saw it. And you want to point the finger about me being in time out?
Are you denying this too, and implying he is lying? Do tell, please. Tell me he's lying, OK? Fact is he isn't lying. But you're fully aware you said it right?Yet I see no proof
all I see is you and your pal making accusations
come on man, If you show it I will show you what a real man does and own up to it
then continue to watch you continue to refuse to acknowledge any wrong doing
Yet I see no proof.Are you denying this too, and implying he is lying? Do tell, please. Tell me he's lying, OK? Fact is he isn't lying. But you're fully aware you said it right?
Perhaps he'll go show where you did say it. I bet you wouldn't even man up and own it then, right?
Now, go find the proof where I slandered. You said it is deep, should be easy to find.
Also, while you had me on ignore, you insulted and name called, right?
That's one right there. That's what he was doing with me on ignore. There is more.
You know your desire for retribution or whatever it is you are after is not a pretty thing.
Everyone can share in the blame on those exchanges on that thread, and your desire to make it look like you were wholly and completely without fault is not at all accurate.
@dcontroversal owned up to it publicly that he was given a "time out" and he has moved on.
It is obvious you came to this thread with an agenda.
Maybe you should ask yourself why you are dredging all this up?
If anything @Lightskin was the one most wronged person in that exchange not you.
I did
Well looks here, I found the post. Because I am not to proud to admit when I do something wrongYou talking to preacher of lies again?
dc did man up to it, this man still denies it
he is trying to stir us up, all he is doing is continuing to expose his true self
has he ever admitted to his sins like dc did?
Will you admit you have made inflammatory remarks to others?Hasn't happened, that is absolutely false.
Provide proof I slandered.
When you had me on ignore you hurled insults, slander, name calling. Right?
I'll get to the proof of your teachings later, of which you accused me of lying about. Right? You said I lied about you, correct, that you didn't teach it?
No need for you to try and clean up the mess and get it all twisted into something else below, ok? You plainly taught what you plainly denied and I have all the quotes. No need to start your back pedaling and smoke screens.
Now, as for me, all I teach is in the open, I don't hide behind smoke and mirrors like you. I own it publicly, plainly, with Scripture and even then you still falsely accuse me, don't you e.g.? I teach in the open, 1 Corinthians 4:2. You flat out denied what you teach that is easily proven. So, don't be calling me a liar, ok? You're aware the many times you call me and others this, we don't go running to report you like you threaten to do, right? We're not that juvenile my man.
And I hope to be meeting those who think they can bypass the Holy Spirit in this Scripture:
“For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.
Sadly however, I do have some doubt!
One last time
the whole book is about law
You talking to preacher of lies again?
90 % of what you said it was about concerned the lawThe book called "Hebrews" in our Bibles today is about Christ's superiority; his superiority over the old testament priests, over the old testament sacrifices, over the angels; how He ever lives to offer this sacrifice until the end, How he fulfills the prophecy of Melchisedec. How we as believers should not neglect such a sacrifice that Christ offers (the danger of willful sin, departing from God, coming short of the promise, failing of the grace of God). That Christ partook in flesh and blood to feel the infirmities we feel in order to be our faithful and merciful high priest. How Christ is the minister of the true tabernacle not pitched by man; How the old testament tabernacle and its ordinances were shadows.
No, it not all about law.
Are you denying this too, and implying he is lying? Do tell, please. Tell me he's lying, OK? Fact is he isn't lying. But you're fully aware you said it right?
Perhaps he'll go show where you did say it. I bet you wouldn't even man up and own it then, right?
Now, go find the proof where I slandered. You said it is deep, should be easy to find.
Also, while you had me on ignore, you insulted and name called, right?
It’s been posted that OSAS means one can do anything and still go to heaven. I was just asking if that was true. You use the term. I dont care for it but eternal security seems correct.
sometimes I hate spellcheck.
You continue to slander me and others with lies I will continue to call you outWell, well, looky here. No need to imply my bro lied. Right?:
Shall I go ahead with the other proofs of your teachings you denied, while calling me a liar, slanderer, other insults? Yes or no?
Please end your calling us liars, ok? We have lots of proof of what you've said.