Your first point is that I don't know what a strawman is. You are wrong, it is when someone presents a false argument that isn't being stated to tare down opposed to the argument at hand.
Judges first reply was a verse that did not actually go hand and hand with what elo was saying (God requires works to see His child as righteous) but was posted as a form of agreement.
Your second point is built on the false assumption I am angry. Nope. I am not. The rest of your next point is just you rambling... Maybe you are angry?
Your next point was actually a weak false accusation, and a strawman. The same one you agreed with.
"Your trouble is (along with many others) anytime you hear “works” or “evidence of conversion” you foolishly conflate these with “works salvation” or a “works Gospel.”"
This is false. I have been attacked on this forum and in real life for not only encouraging good works but rebuking evil works. This is just a garbage attempt to justify your silly agreement.
You're posting on a thread called "not by works" and the topic at hand is how to be seen as righteous before God....
If you want to talk about how a Christian ought to walk there is no one here going to speak against "works".(despite your claims)
Next
"There is such a thing as evidence of conversion, it is sanctification."
Yup. All here would agree.
Next
"Now, show me where I said God needs evidence"
Never once said YOU said that, or implied YOU said that. I added that any works of righteousness(which we do), ARE NOT evidence before God that we are His children which elo has disagreed with and judges as seemed to disagree with.
You falsely accused me of making a strawman when I did not.