Not By Works
- Thread starter dcontroversal
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I never thought of it as immoral. Blasphemous, but not immoral.
E
EleventhHour
Guest
This is really getting silly now... you remind of someone on here who used to like to try corner people too....hmmmm...just sayin.
John was preparing the way for the Lord.
And yet immoral people do moral things. Jesus states that very clearly.
Poor John the apostle John, Paul, Peter, Jude, etc. they spent a lot of time talking about sin too
But they broke the first commandment.
If they break one, they’re guilty of all right?
Rejecting Jesus is immoral
E
EleventhHour
Guest
Thank you
I think my point was clear about people leading a moral life.
It means that their behaviour is such that it conforms well to the moral code which can give the "appearance" of an inward new life.
E
EleventhHour
Guest
They did indeed... in contrast to the glorious work of Christ Jesus...is that what you are doing??? hmmm
I didnt say amoral. I said rejecting Jesus is immoral. There is a difference
They do not live AMORAL lives, but you cannot say someone is morally upright if they reject Jesus
Yes. The glorious work of Christ includes spiritual resurrection to newness of life
E
EleventhHour
Guest
I know the difference.
Many people have never heard the Gospel or have yet to hear the Gospel so I disagree with you stringing the two together.
And morality is not to be confused with righteousness.. and not debating this further
Except to state you seem to want to prove the dogma of preservation of the saints over and over ...it is the ongoing theme of all you posts...however you are unwilling to recognize that a person's justified status is an inward reality not always outwardly manifested.
E
EleventhHour
Guest
The does mean perseverance of the saints is correct either.
The fact that you have defend OSAS by stating it is not a license to sin tells me quite a bit.