Go ahead and argue for something you and I agree on, to avoid defending your bad interpretation of 1 John 3. Red herring and strawman argumentation
Not By Works
- Thread starter dcontroversal
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Go ahead and argue for something you and I agree on, to avoid defending your bad interpretation of 1 John 3. Red herring and strawman argumentation
I don't need help. I have the Word of God and the simple rules of biblical interpretation in my corner. I don't need help from a mouse when I have a lion in my corner
Am good brother , the LORD has blessed me so much this past week , I am standing on a mountain today , looking back and seeing how far He has carried me from the valley ...
I have a testimony about my health , praise God , He is faithful to those who walk as He says to walk , I love Him so much , and this week I have got to know Him even more...
Hope you well D , you have been in my thoughts , may not say it , but it is true...
God bless you Dcon ...xox...
You know....I can only think of maybe two/three things we disagree on for the most part off of the top of my head.............I fully believe the three gifts of 1st Corinthians 13 ended with the completion of the word and the timing of the 2nd coming (events surrounding it)....other than that I think we agree for the most part on almost everything.......
Amen and thanks Rose.......keep swinging......and i always think about your stance, sweet spirit and how far you have come.....probably a better testimony than me because I am so rough and gruff hahah
HAHAHA and they remind me of a little rat dog yapping.......yap yap yap yap yap yap yap yap.....no real bark, no real bite and scatter like a covey of quail when the big dogs bark.....yap yap yap yap yap yap yap......like dripping water from a faulty sink
1. What Paul said in Romans and Galatians about the two natures is wholly irrelevant to 1 John 3, because John is not talking about two natures.
2. Saying that 1 John is talking about two natures, and then defending it by alluding to a text somewhere else to defend that position, even though the premise that 1 John 3 is talking about two natures is transposing one text onto another.
3. You stood in agreement with Undergrace, who intimated that good works may not necessarily follow conversion by asking the rhetorical question "what if they don't"
4. Continually lying about and misrepresenting someone is a form of hate. The biblical definition of hate is a failure to love, and love does no ill to his neighbor. And you did ill to me by lying and saying that I reject the two nature teaching. This is an outright lie, and love does not lie. Therefore, you do not love me, and are not keeping Christ's commands
I'm sorry that you don't count being a purchased possession of you Kurios a blessing of Grace. I am sorry that asserting that believers are the purchased possession of Christ, ie they are His douloi and He is their kurios is considered legalistic. Just carry on serving a Saviour whose Lordship is optional, when I know no such thing is true, because He bought us and we are no longer our own
My position NEVER CHANGED. Everything I said is in perfect harmony. The things you you think I said are about grace are in perfect agreement with the things you I said you call legalism. It is because you have an unbalanced theology that you do not truly understand grace.
The bolded...exactly what you are doing....I listed 4 things you falsely accused me of and instead of admitting, apologizing and getting right you double down.....speaks multitudes to your character.....
thanks......see ya pal.....
Yep, DC returned to his own vomit by lying about me AGAIN. He said I dismissed the two natures, which is an outright lie.
Read the first line IN RED. It shows that your accusation against me that I denied the two natures is an outright lie. I mentioned the Pauline theology regarding two natures. It's right there in the link aboveSo you did LIE. And instead of apologizing, repenting, admitting, you double down on your lie.
So are you going to man up and admit that what you said about me dismissing the two natures was false? Of course not. You NEVER man up on your mistakes. And your little playmates enable you in your lying.
Macaroni no one listens to your drivel.....you are the one that took what I said and attributed it to something I did not imply...all can read and see.....again....that is WHY most have you on ignore....you contradict yourself more than a left wing politician....back on ignore pal......
Read the first line IN RED. It shows that your accusation against me that I denied the two natures is an outright lie. I mentioned the Pauline theology regarding two natures. It's right there in the link aboveSo you did LIE. And instead of apologizing, repenting, admitting, you double down on your lie.
So are you going to man up and admit that what you said about me dismissing the two natures was false?..
Of course not. You NEVER man up on your mistakes. And your little playmates enable you in your lying.
Where do you find two natures in 1 John 3?
Where did I dismiss the Pauline teaching of two natures.
You cannot answer. Because both are lies built on sand.
Post 101,575 exposes you as a liar. You said I dismissed the two natures. The link in 101,575 shows that is not true.
Will you man up and admit you were wrong when you said I dismissed the two natures? Of course not. It is not in your NATURE.
So prove me wrong about your nature, and show that you are able to admit when you misrepresented someone. (reminds me of the lie you told about Argueless) Dog returning to his own vomit, as EG said.
Will this post make people angry? Yes. Do I care? No
The truth always makes darkness angry. AND lying is a work of darkness, not of light.
Does anyone hear crickets.......I do.....and I hear the Macaroni boiling in the pot........
E
