I simply asked you if you wanted to answer them, you are as free to refuse as I am
saying that Jesus is God is something no Christ follower should have any issue answering.
unless, there is a reason why you do not want to.
I simply asked you if you wanted to answer them, you are as free to refuse as I am
Like I said, if you want to discuss trinity start a thread on it, this one is about something else entirelysaying that Jesus is God is something no Christ follower should have any issue answering.
unless, there is a reason why you do not want to.
So you can't. That is alright I already knew that you couldn't.Context Lightsaber........my stance is good.....so is the use of the use of the word within the context....it is not about losing salvation......maybe one of these days you might figure it out Lightbulb
I twisted nothing and I *properly harmonized scripture with scripture* before reaching my conclusion on doctrine, instead of forcing the text to conform to a biased theory, as you did.
James 2:19 also says the demons believe (same Greek word "pisteuo") yet we know they are not saved, unless you would like to argue they are saved because they "believe." It's the same for these Jews in John John 8:31-59, who were said to have "believed" yet they turned out to be slaves to sin, indifferent to the words of Jesus’, children of the devil, liars, accused Jesus of having a demon and were guilty of setting out to stone and kill the one they have professed to believe in. You call that saving belief?![]()
Yes, James does say it clearly and "faith without works is dead" does not does not mean that faith is dead until it produces works and then it becomes a living faith or that works are the source of life in faith or that we are saved by works. That's like say that a tree is dead UNTIL it produces fruit and the fruit is the source of life in the tree. Like flows through the root of a living tree and produces fruit. So does a dead tree produce fruit in order to become a living tree or does a tree produce fruit BECAUSE it's a living tree? This is common sense.
Dead is dead, which is the opposite of alive, as we see in (Ephesians 2:5-8). You really believe that Jesus never doubted that those Jews in John chapter 8 truly believed, even after saying they were slaves to sin, children of the devil and liars? If you can believe that then you can believe anything!
You seem to believe that "all" belief is the same "except for the lack of works" and you cannot seem to grasp a deeper faith which trusts exclusively in Jesus Christ for salvation, which explains why you have so much faith in works.
Only one (the 4th soil) produced fruit and demonstrated genuine consummated belief resulting in salvation. Shallow, temporary belief that has no root, produces not fruit and withers away does not represent saving belief.
Then there was no genuine repentance. Works are the fruit, by product and demonstrative evidence of genuine repentance/faith, but not the essence of repentance/faith and not the means of our salvation.
True faith does not remain barren of works, so all genuine believers are fruitful, yet not all are equally fruitful.
Again, works are the fruit, by product and demonstrative evidence of genuine faith.
No, "truly repented, but produces no works at all" is an OXYMORON. If repentance is genuine, it will results in works.
Those who are born of God practice righteousness and not sin (1 John 3:9-10)
There are plenty of non-genuine believers (nominal Christians) who do not continue in His word. Judas Iscariot is a good example.
Continuing in His word is evidence of saving belief and not the cause. Belief that does not continue was never firmly rooted and established from the start. Shallow, temporary belief that does not continue was dead all along.
Again, in James 2:19, we see that the demons believe "mental assent" that "there is one God" but they do not believe in/have faith in/trust in/reliance in Jesus Christ for salvation. Big difference!
They believe "mental assent" in God, but they do not believe in or on the Lord Jesus Christ and are not saved (Acts 16:31) Do you understand the big difference?
"Continuing in evil works/does not continue in His word" is not descriptive of those who are born of God.
Firstly I have no idea what concupiscence meansCan I ask you something?
If I wanted understanding of the following for example, would concordances be needed or helpful? Or, would I need the Holy Spirit solely to inform/enlighten me when specifically in Paul's life he was referring to and how/why sin could take occasion of the commandment to arouse all manner of concupiscence in him, and the rest of the passage to?
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me. rom7:7-11
To overcome what?Rom 5:2 Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace by which we have been established, and we boast because of our hope in God's glory.
Rom 5:3 Not only that, but we also boast in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance,
Rom 5:4 endurance produces character, and character produces hope.
Rom 5:5 Now this hope does not disappoint us, because God's love has been poured out into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us.
Everything is given to us to overcome. The answer to all this is to be filled with Holy Spirit. Make this the goal. Not works.
Im only putting this up as you said it interests you, it concerns verses7-13Firstly I have no idea what concupiscence means
Maybe explain that to me.
If we are talking about Romans 7:7-11 I have read the verses through to
Romans 7:7-25
The History and Experience of Jews under the Law
7 Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said, “You must not covet.”
8 But sin used this command to arouse all kinds of covetous desires within me! If there were no law, sin would not have that power.
9 At one time I lived without understanding the law. But when I learned the command not to covet, for instance, the power of sin came to life,
10 and I died. So I discovered that the law’s commands, which were supposed to bring life, brought spiritual death instead.
11 Sin took advantage of those commands and deceived me; it used the commands to kill me.
12 But still, the law itself is holy, and its commands are holy and right and good.
13 But how can that be? Did the law, which is good, cause my death? Of course not! Sin used what was good to bring about my condemnation to death. So we can see how terrible sin really is. It uses God’s good commands for its own evil purposes.
14 So the trouble is not with the law, for it is spiritual and good. The trouble is with me, for I am all too human, a slave to sin.
15 I don’t really understand myself, for I want to do what is right, but I don’t do it. Instead, I do what I hate.
16 But if I know that what I am doing is wrong, this shows that I agree that the law is good.
17 So I am not the one doing wrong; it is sin living in me that does it.
18 And I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. I want to do what is right, but I can’t.
19 I want to do what is good, but I don’t. I don’t want to do what is wrong, but I do it anyway.
20 But if I do what I don’t want to do, I am not really the one doing wrong; it is sin living in me that does it.
21 I have discovered this principle of life—that when I want to do what is right, I inevitably do what is wrong.
22 I love God’s law with all my heart.
23 But there is another power within me that is at war with my mind. This power makes me a slave to the sin that is still within me.
24 Oh, what a miserable person I am! Who will free me from this life that is dominated by sin and death?
25 Thank God! The answer is in Jesus Christ our Lord. So you see how it is: In my mind I really want to obey God’s law, but because of my sinful nature I am a slave to sin.
So in all honesty I've read many explanations concerning this. Mainly verses 15-25.
Two sides of the coin here with regards to this.
Paul pre believer and Paul as a believer.
Not looked at concordances on this.
But as said read a lot about it. To me no Greek nuances needed here.
But this whole chapter does my head in.
I have prayed and begged God for understanding.
You see when I sin to me it is me doing it.
Some translations use "Sinful Nature" like the above. But the word nature is actually "Sarx" which is flesh.
As follows
Romans 7:18-20
18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good I do not find. 19 For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. 20 Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.
So I can't answer your question.
Because I don't get this chapter.
Yet I know I sin and I have no idea why. Because I hate my sin with a passion.
I do not walk after the flesh but I fail.
But is my nature sinful or my flesh?
Either way we know that Paul goes on to Romans 8.
Still does not help me though.
Because I still sin.
Sorry I can't answer the question asked.
You have not done anything other than post your opinion by subjective comments which have no bearing on the scripture cited. 1 Corinthians 9:23-27 is what is being discussed. Make your point there. Your comments earlier in regards to Paul being disqualified from the ministry is not support by the context of the passage you were discussing. Here the post is again. Prove it wrong within the passage.
Disqualified; castaway; rejected not much difference.
CONTEXT shows a disqualification alright.
It implies no finish of the race. One crown to be awarded. An nonperishable one. And this my friend is only given to those who finish.
Contexts implies no crown because the race is not finished due to a disqualification.
1Cor 9:23 And this I do for the gospel's sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.
Partaker of what? The Gospel with you.
If someone is not partaking of the Gospel are they saved?
NO they are not.
"Might be a partaker" is being spoken in the subjunctive mood. The mood of possibilities. In other words His partaking of the Gospel is not a given. There is a possibility that he will not. This comes out even clearer as we continue.
In respect to verse 23's proclamation Paul continues.
1Cor 9:24 Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain.
So run that ye might obtain.
Obtain what? Salvation through the life in Christ; the Gospel.
1Cor 9:25 And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.
So let us Run temperate in all things that we might obtain the crown that is imperishable; eternal life through Christ.
1Cor 9:26 I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:
I therefore so run; temperate in all things that I might obtain the crown that is imperishable; eternal life, Paul says.
1Cor 9:27 But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway.
Paul says "Lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."
Cast; Disqualified from what? The Race he himself is running.That He might obtain the crown that is imperishable; eternal life,
So you can't. That is alright I already knew that you couldn't.
BTW Nice play on my screenname.
Lightsaber...Lightbulb lol
Oh incidentally not that you care but I will not be replying to your posts in relation to our conversation anymore unless you have something relevant in relation to 1 Cor 9:23-27.
Exactly.....Thanks for the scripture.Can faith be faith in Jesus without love?
John did not believe so. He stated to claim to know God and not love, makes one a liar.
If anyone says, "I love God," yet hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen.
1 John 4:20
Concupiscense is the sin nature.....or the flesh.Firstly I have no idea what concupiscence means
Maybe explain that to me.
If we are talking about Romans 7:7-11 I have read the verses through to
Romans 7:7-25
The History and Experience of Jews under the Law
7 Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said, “You must not covet.”
8 But sin used this command to arouse all kinds of covetous desires within me! If there were no law, sin would not have that power.
9 At one time I lived without understanding the law. But when I learned the command not to covet, for instance, the power of sin came to life,
10 and I died. So I discovered that the law’s commands, which were supposed to bring life, brought spiritual death instead.
11 Sin took advantage of those commands and deceived me; it used the commands to kill me.
12 But still, the law itself is holy, and its commands are holy and right and good.
13 But how can that be? Did the law, which is good, cause my death? Of course not! Sin used what was good to bring about my condemnation to death. So we can see how terrible sin really is. It uses God’s good commands for its own evil purposes.
14 So the trouble is not with the law, for it is spiritual and good. The trouble is with me, for I am all too human, a slave to sin.
15 I don’t really understand myself, for I want to do what is right, but I don’t do it. Instead, I do what I hate.
16 But if I know that what I am doing is wrong, this shows that I agree that the law is good.
17 So I am not the one doing wrong; it is sin living in me that does it.
18 And I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. I want to do what is right, but I can’t.
19 I want to do what is good, but I don’t. I don’t want to do what is wrong, but I do it anyway.
20 But if I do what I don’t want to do, I am not really the one doing wrong; it is sin living in me that does it.
21 I have discovered this principle of life—that when I want to do what is right, I inevitably do what is wrong.
22 I love God’s law with all my heart.
23 But there is another power within me that is at war with my mind. This power makes me a slave to the sin that is still within me.
24 Oh, what a miserable person I am! Who will free me from this life that is dominated by sin and death?
25 Thank God! The answer is in Jesus Christ our Lord. So you see how it is: In my mind I really want to obey God’s law, but because of my sinful nature I am a slave to sin.
So in all honesty I've read many explanations concerning this. Mainly verses 15-25.
Two sides of the coin here with regards to this.
Paul pre believer and Paul as a believer.
Not looked at concordances on this.
But as said read a lot about it. To me no Greek nuances needed here.
But this whole chapter does my head in.
I have prayed and begged God for understanding.
You see when I sin to me it is me doing it.
Some translations use "Sinful Nature" like the above. But the word nature is actually "Sarx" which is flesh.
As follows
Romans 7:18-20
18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good I do not find. 19 For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. 20 Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.
So I can't answer your question.
Because I don't get this chapter.
Yet I know I sin and I have no idea why. Because I hate my sin with a passion.
I do not walk after the flesh but I fail.
But is my nature sinful or my flesh?
Either way we know that Paul goes on to Romans 8.
Still does not help me though.
Because I still sin.
Sorry I can't answer the question asked.
My ancestry is Muslim.Im only putting this up as you said it interests you, it concerns verses7-13
When I was ten, my parents moved church, and obviously I moved with them. The first thing that impressed me about the new church was, I must take God very seriously indeed, and so, a few weeks later I responded to an altar call and set out on the Christian path. The first change I noticed in me was, I became aware of my sin/shortcomings in a profound way, obviously because the law was now in my heart and mind, and through it I was conscious of sin. And so I set out to live a pure and holy life for God, I wanted that more than anything, for I wanted to follow my saviour, and I could not expect to live a life of sin and still be saved, for I knew even then, God hates sin.
But there was a problem, I could not rid myself of my imperfections, I got angry at times(as kids and adults do) told fibs, wasn’t as kind as I should be to some people and all the time I felt much guilt at this, I was not living as a Christian should live.
But when I reached puberty, the problems magnified greatly, for along came impure thoughts. I honestly did not want them, I wanted to live a pure and holy life for God. And I feared those thoughts, for they could send me to hell, I was not living a pure and Holy life for God. Of course, I asked God to forgive me my sin, and when I earnestly did so I was sure I was forgiven, but the sin kept coming back, and it got worse and worse gradually over time. The more I feared those impure thoughts the worse they got, it was hopeless, I could not be free of them. Eventually, I was consumed by all manner of concupiscence and I felt condemned, for I was far from living a pure and Holy life now. In the five years since I got saved, I had just become swamped by sin, and lost the happiness I had previously, I was wracked with guilt, fear and condemnation.
Looking back at that time now, how could I describe it?
Is the law sin? Certainly not, for I would not have known what sin was but for the law, I would not have known the rottenness of lust if the law had not said: Thou shalt not covet. But sin, took advantage of my knowledge of the commandment to arouse all manner of concupiscence in me. How could sin do that? Because the power of sin is the law(1cor15:56) the legally enforceable law with its power to condemn, and I believed it could condemn me, so the sin just got worse and worse.
I had felt alive once without the law, just a normal happy kid, for there was no condemnation then, but when it did come, sin revived(or sin consciousness sprang to life) and I died/felt condemned. The commandment I believed was ordained to life(if I obeyed it) instead brought death(condemnation) for I could not keep it. Sin fooled me, taking occasion of the commandment to slay me. For I hinged everything on faultlessly obeying it.
However, the law itself is Holy, just and good, nothing wrong with it at all. But wasn’t that which is good the thing that brought death to me? God forbid, but sin, that it might appear sin, be shown to be what it is, wrought death in me from what was good, and sin by the commandment became utterly sinful
You see, saul the Pharisee made a personal commitment to God at the age of thirteen, the law came to him in a profound way to at that age. And I, in reality tried to attain to Heaven exactly the same way he did, and so I got exactly the same result he did
Great post.here is my post in its context showing who has eternal life straight from the bible
lets look at who does has eternal life
Jesus answers, "Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death" (John 8:51).
Paul replies that God "will render to every man according to his deeds: to them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life" (Rom. 2:6-7).
btw: i didnt write these verses..........i'm only quoting them
The writer to the Hebrews states that Christ is "the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him" (5:9).
John adds: "Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father. And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life" (I John 2:24-25).
if.....shall continue in the son...........dont miss it please
This is an impressive array of clear-cut, unambiguous answers. Who has and shall have eternal life?
Those who keep Christ's sayings; those who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honor and immortality; those who obey the Lord; and those who continue in the Son and in the Father. None other need apply.
Concupiscense is the sin nature.....or the flesh.
It's what makes us sin....different churches call it different names.
Some call it Original Sin...I like sin nature.
Interesting.Concupiscense is the sin nature.....or the flesh.
It's what makes us sin....different churches call it different names.
Some call it Original Sin...I like sin nature.
You never lost your faith Bill.My ancestry is Muslim.
Even dedicated to Allah.
I came believer when I watched the movie Jesus of Nazareth.
Did not fully understand it but believed he died and rose again.
I was 7.
Now 51.
Gone astray, but never lost my faith in Jesus.
Every time this dumb sheep who has gone astray and bleats "Jesus I need help" he shows up
.
Gone astray, but never lost my faith in Jesus.
Every time this dumb sheep who has gone astray and bleats "Jesus I need help" he shows up
Like I said, if you want to discuss trinity start a thread on it, this one is about something else entirely
Wow.