So what......not the context of my referenced verse...you just cannot help but twist things hey.....more proof of your character
Did you bring it up in the Prodigal Son thread or not?
So what......not the context of my referenced verse...you just cannot help but twist things hey.....more proof of your character
Lol, the context of the parable is clear, read Luke 15:1-3
So DC please answer. If a prodigal son does in that state, is he still a son?
If you say yes, then you are talking about a prodigal that didn't come back
So that's three things you denied saying that I have documented that you did say
1. A person can be saved for years and not bear fruit
2 a theoretical prodigal who does not return
3. My original meaning of works are a gift.
All documented above
So I thought you said I was a liar about 1 and 2. But you proved I was not lying.
Number 1 you flat out ADMIT saying and believing
Number 2- if a person never stops being a son, that means even when dying in sin. But the prodigal was not a backslidden christian, HE WAS A BACKSLIDDEN JEW COMING TO JESUS. Read Luke 15:1-3
So you are the one who is looking foolish, denying you said something and then later admitting you said it, not accepting three apologies for an honest mistake I made, and repeated namecalling.
Number 3- I provided post where I clearly stated what I meant by works are a gift, ie the purpose of God He has given us, the works that He ordained before we were born for us, they are part of salvation. Not part of obtaining salvation, but what ACCOMPANIES SALVATION AND RESULTS FROM SALVATION, therefore if they are given to us BY HIM, they are gifts.
How exactly do you define gifts?
Well you could ask children/the immature to stop name calling, but I doubt you will get very far.
Some peoples understanding seems to be limited to repeatedly stating: ''you are not saved by works of the law, you cannot lose your salvation, you will go to Heaven no matter what'' etc. Possibly they need to branch out/expand their understanding a wee bit. In the mean time, all you are likely to get is comments such as:
hahahahahahahahahahaha
It may be best to move on. to other more stimulating debates.
........the rest of your post..............
ig·no·rantDictionary result for ignorant
/ˈiɡnərənt/
adjective
- lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated.
"he was told constantly that he was ignorant and stupid"
synonyms:uneducated, unknowledgeable, untaught, unschooled, untutored, untrained, illiterate, unlettered, unlearned, unread, uninformed, unenlightened, unscholarly, unqualified, benighted, backward; More
Well if you believe the above applies to me, who not enlighten me concerning the scriptures, give me the benefit of your knowledge so I may be less ignorant. Please explain the following to me line by line and what Paul is stating in those verses and whom he is speaking them of.
What justification is he talking about that obviously takes time to achieve?
Why does he ask the question, ‘’does Christ promote sin?’’
What does he mean in the last sentance? I will thank you in advance for explaining it all to me.
But if, in seeking to be justified in Christ, we Jews find ourselves also among the sinners, doesn’t that mean that Christ promotes sin? Absolutely not! 18 If I rebuild what I destroyed, then I really would be a law-breaker. Gal2:16&17
Why is it we do EVERYTHING a certain way in the world, but when we get to spiritual truths we SWITCH the rules up!
If I tell you in order to learn bridling your horse you have to call this one guy to come and teach you.
In the earthly realm you would just make the call and say "Hello Sir please come help me"
THATS THE END OF THAT. If this was a spiritual truth or a scripture we would start thinking "What do i got to say when I call him? After he teaches me how to bridle my horse do i have to offer him some coffee? should i take a shower after doing it? Maybe i should sweep the stable extra clean today. "
IN OTHER WORDS.: WE OVER COMPLICATE THINGS. And it seems like SIMPLICITY IN CHRIST is almost a SIN to some these days. Acts 16:30-31 makes it clear. And this is written AFTER Jesus' death burial and resurrection so its the NEW COVENANT, even to our dispensationalist friends, AND its said to a GENTILE by the Apostle to the gentiles: PAUL.
WHAT do i need to do to be saved? Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.
I did that now. What else? *facepalm*........
Two of your three answers to my questions were correct, credit where credit is due. But the Christian is justified by faith in Christ immediately at the point of conversion, as I am sure you would agree, so what justification is Paul speaking of, for he is clearly writing of a justification that takes time to achieveIt was directed at your mouthy, uncalled for comment.......and the book of Galatians is clear...........some FOOL had taught them that their salvation had begun by faith and then was finished OFF by works/works of the law (namely circumcision)........PAUL calls that a gospel of a DIFFERENT kind with NO POWER to save, was DOUBLE cursed and all that believe it are fools and bewitched.....nice partial quote in the midst of a greater context.....HE speaks to Peter's hypocrisy and the fact that his FREEDOM in CHRIST had been examined by the supposed church pillars... James, Peter and John and then given the right hand of fellowship........his statement is clear and summed up in these truths....
We have BEEN justified by the faith of CHRIST by BELIEF
NO flesh can be or will be justified by the works of the LAW
IT is CHRIST that LIVES IN US by FAITH
WHILE BEING JUSTIFIED by CHRIST if we are found IN SIN is CHRIST the MINISTER of SIN (NO he is NOT)
IF he goes BACK and through the LAW attempts to rebuild again he is found a TRANSGRESSOR (by the law which condemns)
HE is dead to the LAW because the LAW or works of the LAW justifies NO ONE
IF righteousness comes by LAW KEEPING CHRIST DIED IN VAIN
16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.
18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.
19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.
20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
Doesnt count! NO chapter and verse!It was directed at your mouthy, uncalled for comment.......and the book of Galatians is clear...........some FOOL had taught them that their salvation had begun by faith and then was finished OFF by works/works of the law (namely circumcision)........PAUL calls that a gospel of a DIFFERENT kind with NO POWER to save, was DOUBLE cursed and all that believe it are fools and bewitched.....nice partial quote in the midst of a greater context.....HE speaks to Peter's hypocrisy and the fact that his FREEDOM in CHRIST had been examined by the supposed church pillars... James, Peter and John and then given the right hand of fellowship........his statement is clear and summed up in these truths....
We have BEEN justified by the faith of CHRIST by BELIEF
NO flesh can be or will be justified by the works of the LAW
IT is CHRIST that LIVES IN US by FAITH
WHILE BEING JUSTIFIED by CHRIST if we are found IN SIN is CHRIST the MINISTER of SIN (NO he is NOT)
IF he goes BACK and through the LAW attempts to rebuild again he is found a TRANSGRESSOR (by the law which condemns)
HE is dead to the LAW because the LAW or works of the LAW justifies NO ONE
IF righteousness comes by LAW KEEPING CHRIST DIED IN VAIN
16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.
18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.
19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.
20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
So there are things that result from, accompany, and are the fruit of salvation, but are not gifts? Does that mean they are
A not beneficial
Or that
B. they do not flow from God's grace/ unmerited favor?
or
c. They are something we add to grace?
so salvation is a gift, but rewards are merited? Rewards do not flow from grace, but are
merited/earned?
ok...
So there are things that result from, accompany, and are the fruit of salvation, but are not gifts?
so we can boast before God about our works, although not of our salvation?
Interesting that works are considered a gift.I did not deny anything other than your twist...which you have done incessantly since coming on this site.......and I go back to the original stance...works are not a GIFT and you have yet to post scripture that states as much......so...twist away pal....your character can be seen by all.....end of story
I don't understand the reasoning why works would be a gift. For one thing the works are for another's benefit aren't they? Not for us. If you think of the gifts of Holy Spirit like healing and deliverance etc. then that too would be for others. If it's a gift at all it's not for the worker. It's the fruit of our faith in the work of God.
I would call it ministering.
Makes no sense.
Two of your three answers to my questions were correct, credit where credit is due. But the Christian is justified by faith in Christ immediately at the point of conversion, as I am sure you would agree, so what justification is Paul speaking of, for he is clearly writing of a justification that takes time to achieve
Doesnt count! NO chapter and verse!![]()
Interesting that works are considered a gift.
My assumption when it comes to works is that they are what Jesus uses to separate the sheep and the goats.
So I know many people and organisations that do and promote such works, yet they are not Christian/Belivers who have confessed Jesus is Lord of their lives.
So firstly if they do such works are they gift from God?
Secondly if they do such works are they saved as a result of them?
If so then faith is not needed but only works.
If works save or keep us saved, then there is no need for faith.
When Jesus hung on that cross and for 3 hours when it was dark and God could not look upon him what was happening?
All of our sins were being laid upon him, the thing that separates us from God.
Not our lack of works.
But if, in seeking to be justified in Christ, we Jews find ourselves also among the sinners, doesn’t that mean that Christ promotes sin? Absolutely not! 18 If I rebuild what I destroyed, then I really would be a law-breaker. Gal2:16&17If you are referencing vs. 17 I do not believe he is speaking to a different position of justification........
In Romans he writes....Therefore we conclude a man is justified by faith without the deeds/works of the law.....it is positional justification, a completed action and we have been declared innocent in Christ by faith before GOD.....
The statement-->seek to be justified is a verb in the Aorist Infinitive passive and is the same verb being used to describe that which has taken place in Christ I.E. The meaning of the Aorist Infinitive Passive is "to be have something done to one
Original Word: δικαιόω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: dikaioó
Phonetic Spelling: (dik-ah-yo'-o)
Definition: to show to be righteous, declare righteous
Usage: I make righteous, defend the cause of, plead for the righteousness (innocence) of, acquit, justify; hence: I regard as righteous
The whole context pf chapter 2 must be taken into account........the contrast between the circumcision and uncircumcision, LAW and Grace.....
My view is simple......in light of the context and contrast of the entire chapter Paul is simply saying that when we seek to be rendered innocent by Christ (justified) and at the same time are guilty as sinners is Christ the minister of SIN because he JUSTIFIES us even while being found sinner........GOD forbid...........The LAW of GOD while condemning as GUILTY is SET aside as CHRIST JUSTIFIES US even while we are still found in sin....<-----Remember what John said....IF we say that we have no sin we are deceived and the truth is not in us.......
I liken it to forgiving one guilty of some horrific sin or crime....I.E>...If you do something to me and I forgive you and declare you innocent of your crime am I condoning your crime by declaring you innocent even though you are guilty?
We have been declared RIGHTEOUS and INNOCENT even though we are guilty of sin by the law....EVEN now we fail and sin and are still guilty of the LAW if it was held against us....does this make Christ the minister of sin...NOPE
That is my view and I believe it bears out
Actually you come against the Spirit because it is who you are and you have no argument against it.
So you belittle and defame.