J
joefizz
Guest
I guess,I was expecting preacher to answer back with a definition,oh well I guess I can use a search engine lol.Hominy grits. The best part of the breakfast here in the South. The word was just misspelled. lol
I guess,I was expecting preacher to answer back with a definition,oh well I guess I can use a search engine lol.Hominy grits. The best part of the breakfast here in the South. The word was just misspelled. lol
Ad hominem:strategy of argument.I guess,I was expecting preacher to answer back with a definition,oh well I guess I can use a search engine lol.
Also known as a logical fallacy.Ad hominem:strategy of argument.
If there is no difference between sinning and living in sin then everyone, including you, will not inherit the kingdom.
There HAS to be a difference between living in sin and sinning, or else the above scripture is saying every single person will not inherit the kingdom. Including you.
If Paul was talking about being this as a born again believer then he would be condemning himself by his own words about the person who lives in sin not inheriting the kingdom.
I feel I need to clarify what I mean by "nice",nice:not taking a stance so as to not hurt someone's feelings even when what one says is true,now we are to"love our neighbors as ourselves" but this doesn't mean that when push comes to shove that we are to "back down" when someone is "doing that which is wrong", or "promoting a view that is questionable",like in my case I believe we are saved by accepting Jesus as Saviour,some don't,now I of course will "care for any individual" but if "I witness something completely uncalled for" " I will speak up",if I "see a questionable doctrine" "I will stand against it with biblical truth".Because it's "not evil" it's what is right,you "tell the truth" if you are "for God" if you're gonna "be nice" to everyone then you'll get "trodded upon" granted you can still converse but you have to "have a foundation" and "stick to it",Jesus did not "shy away" from "truth" when a false teacher came tempting he set them straight.
True we shouldn't "name call" and yes we don't have to "agree" with what eachother says,but we should always still "care for one another".Y'all going to have to provide me with scripture where Jesus gave anyone permission to be mean to others in any circumstance or where he said anything like we can be rude to others. Because really, if he did then I've never read it...
I mean seriously we don't have to agree with others... but we can't mistreat others either can we? I don't think Jesus has called any of us to go out name calling, or to beat the Gospel into anyone else's head.
Amen.
Then we are in agreement and can continue as brothers following the Lord, walking in His ways
and knowing the Holy Spirit working in our lives, Halleluyah.
I do not know who is saved and who is not, all I know is my Lord is my Saviour and brought me
from death to life. Each day I bring that new day to Him in praise and thanks giving for the blessing He
is to me, to give me another day here to share His communion and presence with myself and others.
[video=youtube;_NiivaEa8ns]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NiivaEa8ns&list=RDGMEMMib4QpREwENw3_jAc0Y gNwVM_NiivaEa8ns[/video]
Amen I completely agree with this and your post above, as well.True we shouldn't "name call" and yes we don't have to "agree" with what eachother says,but we should always still "care for one another".
Ok this getting a bit ridiculous now,I disagreed with Peter's view and felt an evil in him when he pursued hurting a fellow member and I called him on it,but if he has returned under another name then I do welcome him back just like with Fran if she has returned,because I believe in "second chances" and though I didn't "agree" with them I still for awhile "liked talking to them" and if they "have changed" then I look forward to talking to them again,two users may be said people but "railing on them" "isn't fruitful" and anyways if they "repeat their actions" then "history will repeat itself" so let's get back to the topic at hand while being vigilant but respectful.Will this thread ever peter out??
![]()
Ok this getting a bit ridiculous now,l.
Ok this getting a bit ridiculous now,
Of course,just clarifying the obvious,or at least what I thought was obvious.Joe - there's a time to speak up and there a time to shut up.
Hopefully you recognise which is which.
Amen! In James 2:21, we notice that James does not say that Abraham's work of offering up Isaac resulted in God's accounting Abraham as righteous. The accounting of Abraham's faith as righteousness was made in Genesis 15:6, even many years before his work of offering up Isaac recorded in Genesis 22.
The work of Abraham did not have some kind of intrinsic merit to save him, but it showed or manifested the genuineness of his faith. This is the sense in which Abraham was justified by works. He was "shown to be righteous."
So Abraham was accounted as righteous based on his faith (Genesis 15:6) not his works (Romans 4:2-3) long before he offered up Isaac on the altar in Genesis 22. When Abraham performed the good work in Genesis 22; he fulfilled the expectations created by the pronouncement of his faith in Genesis 15:6.
Amen! Noah had already "found grace" (Genesis 6:8), was "a preacher of righteousness" (2 Peter 2:5), and "walked with God" BEFORE he built the ark. His obedience was a DEMONSTRATION of his faith, not the origin of it.
Amen! Romans 4:2 - For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. 3 For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it (faith, not works) was accounted to him for righteousness.” 4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. 5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, 6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works.
Will this thread ever peter out??
![]()
True we shouldn't "name call" and yes we don't have to "agree" with what eachother says,but we should always still "care for one another".
Man's second attempt to offer his works....Cain offwring his own works....rejected and denied by God....Abel by faith offered BLOOD....God received it....man's works will not be accepted to make one right....it takes faith into the blood.....God said, "When I see the blood, I will pass over you!"
Cain is also identifed as a lost man and false teacher in Jude....as are all who push works for salvation or jistification before God!