Zmouth,
It's kind of difficult to see that tiny writing.
From what I know, it's accepted that John the Apostle wrote the gospel of John and the 3 epistles and also Revelation.
You could tell by how he referred to himself in the first person.
He is referred to as the Beloved Disciple and this was certainly John the Apostle.
John 21:20, 23.24.
Irenaeus testifies to the effect that this is John, son of Zebedee.
(He was an early Church theologian).
So who were the two witnesses that claimed Jesus said he would destroy the temple? I presume that they were referring when Jesus said no stone would be left upon stone but apparently there were two witnesses that rose up again him
60 But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none.
At the last came two false witnesses,
61 And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.
Matt 26:60-61
So if these witnesses were testifying about Jesus claiming that no two stones would be left upon each other then wouldn't they be subject to death for giving false testimony under the OT law ( Deut 19:16-19 states)
16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
17 Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;
18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;
19 Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.
So who were the two that could have testified against Jesus since there was nobody with Jesus except for disciples outside the temple when he spoke about the destruction of the temple.
35 And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, come unto him, saying, Master, we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire.
36 And he said unto them, What would ye that I should do for you?
37 They said unto him, Grant unto us that we may sit, one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left hand, in thy glory.
38 But Jesus said unto them, Ye know not what ye ask: can ye drink of the cup that I drink of? and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?
39 And they said unto him, We can. And Jesus said unto them, Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:
40 But to sit on my right hand and on my left hand is not mine to give; but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared.
Mark 10:35-40
Yes. The known world was under one ruler. Caesar means god.
Since Pharaoh sent Noah to the Americas and the NT speaks of the churches in Asia, yeah I would say all the known world.
Caesers were gods, until they got sick or died, then they realized they weren't gods after all. But it must have been nice for them to be treated as one since they were pagans all the way.
Wonder what it meant in the OT wherein it is written, Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people. Ex 22:28
Well, the days our of flesh are numbered the same as the days of those born of the dust of the ground, 120 years. Yet the dust gives up the spirit in their nostrils and the soul in the heart of the flesh shines on.
And no, I do not know Latin.
Thanks for the info.
As you probably already know, Julius Caesar was the assassinated ruler of the Roman Republic and was granted the title posthumously of Divus Julius (Divine or Immortal Julius) by the Senate of the Roman Republic in 42 BC. I guess that would be like God-man to Christians.