No Epstein Files?

[ResidentAlien]

They're hiding something. It would've been a lot better for them if they had just kept quiet and let the whole thing slip quietly into the night. I don't know what he's hiding, but by doing what they did it's clearly bad enough he felt he had to try and bury it. Donald's a perv, everyone knows he's a perv; only question is, to what degree.

 

[cv5]

BREAKING: DOJ STILL REVIEWING EPSTEIN FILES FOR POSSIBLE RELEASE

The Department of Justice has told a federal court it's still reviewing the long-sealed Jeffrey Epstein records, according to Judicial Watch. The group confirmed their FOIA lawsuit is ongoing, and vowed to keep the pressure on: “We will be relentless in demanding transparency under law.”

Years after Epstein’s death, key documents remain sealed - including names, flight logs, communications, and potential co-conspirators. Now the question isn’t just what’s in the files - it’s why they’re still hidden.

Source:
@EricLDaugh
, Judicial Watch

 

[Marston]

Has CNN or any top Democratic officials said anything critical of Team Trump for this latest Epstein development?

 

[Eli1]

Has CNN or any top Democratic officials said anything critical of Team Trump for this latest Epstein development?

CNN hasn't focused on this actually.
CNN has been focusing on blaming weather phenomena to Trump.

 

[cv5]

Has CNN or any top Democratic officials said anything critical of Team Trump for this latest Epstein development?

It was total radio silence regarding Epstein from the Democrats for the last 10 years.
And so it is likewise today.

Democrats will not touch the topic with a 10 foot pole. For obvious reasons.

 

[cv5]

ShadowofEzra
Former Epstein attorney Alan Dershowitz says he has personally seen the full client list linked to Jeffrey Epstein.

While maintaining his innocence, he claims the list is being deliberately hidden to shield powerful figures—including politicians and celebrities.

Dershowitz also says he knows exactly who is behind the effort to keep that information buried.

 

[cv5]

@ShadowofEzra
Jeffrey Epstein victim attorney Sigrid McCawley drops a bombshell accusing Pam Bondi’s DOJ of withholding a treasure trove of evidence including names of co-conspirators, financial records, and multiple computers. She says the department has every piece of information on who Epstein was working with and a secret group that helped Epstein conceal his crimes against children. Her trial is scheduled for next year.

 

[Marston]

https://x.com/seanspicer/status/1943322536189509719?t=9KmIjIJ0AqjF5izg2k-z_g&s=19

 

[Marston]

Is there a way to embed X posts?

 

[Marston]

CNN hasn't focused on this actually.
CNN has been focusing on blaming weather phenomena to Trump.

I don't normally bother with CNN but with regard to Epstein I am checking regularly because they are essentially the voice of the Democratic Party/Deep State. Their silence is deafening. I'm not the least bit surprised.

 

[Marston]

It was total radio silence regarding Epstein from the Democrats for the last 10 years.
And so it is likewise today.

Democrats will not touch the topic with a 10 foot pole. For obvious reasons.

Not just Democrats. Bill Barr and other establishment Republicans are in lockstep with the Democrats. Barr's personal connection to Epstein is interesting. One thing is certain, Barr made sure that Epstein would never talk.

 

[HeIsHere]

I don't listen to him. Why is he done? I didn't think he was a big supporter of Trump anyway.

I am trying to understand how anyone can put a boring on a question posed to the President of the USA, where he completely dismisses the gravity of the decisions that have been made regarding the justice for the victims of abuse when underage,

being trafficked to the rich and famous, and yet here you are always deflecting and defending him and things he did in the past as though they are of no consequence.

The double standard is impressive, do you receive free DT Cologne for you unwavering completely biased, uncritical support.

 

[ThereRoseaLamb]

I am trying to understand how anyone can put a boring on a question posed to the President of the USA, where he completely dismisses the gravity of the decisions that have been made regarding the justice for the victims of abuse when underage,

being trafficked to the rich and famous, and yet here you are always deflecting and defending him and things he did in the past as though they are of no consequence.

Yeah, yeah, ya'll have been screaming for his head on a platter ever since he came down the escalator. He's been accused of a million different things, nothing has stuck to the wall yet. Time will tell, but I highly doubt Trump was involved. The Dems would saw off their own legs if they could get Trump for something as big as child sex trafficking. If that's proven without a doubt, then I would not support a child molester right or left. But I highly doubt it.

 

[cv5]

@julie_kelly2

Sources confirm to me the blow up between Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi is very real. This has been brewing for four months and came to a head at the White House on Wednesday. He has not been in the office since. Most of the frustration at FBI relates to her handling of Epstein disclosures and disputes between FBI and Bondi about how to proceed. Bongino appears ready to resign imminently if Bondi remains in office.

@julie_kelly2

There is no question that the base is behind Bongino. I respect Pam Bondi and understand the immense challenge at taking the reins of such a systemically corrupt agency. But the self inflicted wounds and unforced errors are consuming attention away from other DOJ/FBI achievements. Time is ticking away and something drastic needs to change immediately.

 

[cv5]

@nicksortor
·
23m
BREAKING: Dan Bongino WILL NOT stay at FBI if Pam Bondi is not removed, sources close to the Deputy Director tell Daily Wire The next step is obvious: FIRE PAM BONDI This is NOT NEGOTIABLE.

 

[RodB651]

 

[CommodoreTeach]

I respected his stand/argument regarding abortion and identity politics but I have lost much respect for him over the years long with that other chap Jeremy Boreing who has since left the partnership.

He lost a lot of followers when he fired Candace Owens, Shapiro the free speech advocate only for some topics.

I lost any last respect I had for him when he made the comment (or article) about "Why does it matter who shot JFK?" I'd suspected him of shilling for the state of Israel for some time, but to say something like this after his history of references to the Jewish Holocaust (which happened an even longer time ago and effected fewer people) was too hypocritical for me to stomach... But this is typical behaviour for shills - they will decry a genocide which happened nearly a century ago, but defend another one which is still happening today. And I'm not surprised when similar types are in favour of keeping the Epstein pedophile list suppressed, because most intelligent people have a very good idea which foreign government Epstein was working for as he blackmailed high-profile perverts in governments and organisations across the world.

 

[cv5]

 

[Texasgal]

Absolutely no way. If Dems had goods on Trump they'd have nailed him the first time round and they sure wouldn't let him have a second term. They already had him inches from prison, in their minds at least. It would be all over the internet, on every tv, radio, magazine and book if Trump was on "the list". Of that you can be sure.

Not necessarily if they have to cover up some of their own crimes in the process.

 

[ThereRoseaLamb]

Not necessarily if they have to cover up some of their own crimes in the process.

They would find a way. They tried every other way to nail him down. They would have found a way to leak that info out, guaranteed.