There were no men that were sons of God, only Adam.
there were no men that were sons of God, only Adam LOL who God called man LOl Ok the first son of God called, the son of God was Adam a man but there was no man called the son of God.
There were no men that were sons of God, only Adam.
there were no men that were sons of God, only Adam LOL who God called man LOl Ok the first son of God called, the son of God was Adam a man but there was no man called the son of God.
IF Adam was a Son of God, so were those from Adam. Without God, no one is born, For I knew you while you were yet Formed in your Mother's Womb.Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
IF Adam was a Son of God, so were those from Adam. Without God, no one is born, For I knew you while you were yet Formed in your Mother's Womb.
God knows all even after the fallExcept for the fall occurred. Sin entered the world. Man is born after the first Adam, in his fallen condition. We shall bear the image of the second Adam, Jesus Christ. In your formula, everyone is a son of God, even the worst of the worst.
not everyone will be saved God were separate the sheep from the Goats are we literal sheep? no.God knows all even after the fall![]()
not everyone will be saved God were separate the sheep from the Goats are we literal sheep? no.
I handed you the way out of your dogmatic claim, and you doubled down. I tried to set you up for success and you chose to fail anyway.Yes, although I thought it was obvious the discussion was about men not angels.
I handed you the way out of your dogmatic claim, and you doubled down. I tried to set you up for success and you chose to fail anyway.
Maybe you should examine why.![]()
I respect your right to your opinion, but again I ask "Why?"
Thanks for the explanation.He relies too heavily on sources outside of scripture to affirm his theories.
As well, difficult to take a commentator seriously who supports Martin in this theory that the hair in 1 Cor 11 is a reference to genitalia and hair. Again this faulty interpretation is due to an over reliance on writings outside of scripture.
Naked Podcast
I guess he has some entertainment value.