Excellent, and I will show you the fallacies behind your use and application of these references:
1 Timothy 4.1
1But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will [a]fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons,
Nothing in that verse saying anything about the result of the individual falling away from the faith they once held to, so what's your point...apart from assuming into that text a loss that's not there?
Hebrews 6:4-6
4 For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have [a]fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, [b]since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to open shame.
Yes, and there is also statements in the Gospels talking about belief in Christ ensures one HATH salvation, not WILL be saved, but has it in the present tense. So, where it's true that Israel at that time, to whom Hebrews was written, could not expect a second sacrifice by putting Christ to shame a second time, they were indeed lost from then on. That reference in Hebrews doesn't say one word about such an individual being saved nor actually having had true faith.
I said it before, and will say it again: Israelis and proselytes, under the Kingdom Gospel, weren't saved because they endured. They endured because of their faith. This reference in Hebrews describes those whose faith wasn't complete and established, so the second sacrifice simply wasn't going to manifest for them.
2 Corinthians 11:3
3 But I am afraid that, as the serpent deceived Eve by his trickery, your minds will be led astray from sincere and pure devotion to Christ.
Again, you're assuming salvational loss into this text, which clearly isn't there. This plays into that silly nonsense of back-slidden loss of salvation crap that people invent in their own minds, never giving though to what Paul stated:
2 Timothy 2:13
If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.
You people can't seem to get it through your heads that our salvation today is about HIM and HIS faithfulness, not ours. You continue to sin like all the rest of us. Are you going to sit there and claim to be more faithful than others? Is that your basis for comparative knowledge for your salvation in this moment? You're fooling only yourself in all this.
Revelation 2:4-5
4 But I have this against you, that you have left your first love. 5 Therefore, remember from where you have fallen, and repent, and do the [a]deeds you did at first; or else I am coming to you and I will remove your lampstand from its place—unless you repent.
(YAWN) Same fallacy...assuming salvational loss in the text above, in spite of the array of scripture that speaks about our rewards...not to mention that John wrote those letters to churchs comprised of Israelis and proselytes given that never are Gentiles included in imagery of lampstands. Your use of this is yet again dabbling in replacement theology trash.
Romans 11:19-22
19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” 20 Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; 21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. 22 See then the kindness and severity of God: to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; for otherwise you too will be cut off.
Paul was inspired indeed to write about the contrast between Israel as a branch and Gentiles as another branch, with the Lord's main theme in this being CONCEIT. Replacement theology is indeed that level of conceit that you Gentiles perpetrate either directly or through veiled slight-of-hand comments and narratives skimming over that line in an ever so hard to notice crossing.
Matthew 24:10-13
19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” 20 Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; 21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. 22 See then the kindness and severity of God: to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; for otherwise you too will be cut off.
Huh?
James 1:12
12 Blessed is a man who perseveres under trial; for once he has [a]been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him.
Again, James was speaking to...whom, and under what Gospel? Yes, the twelve tribes of Israel under the Kingdom Gospel. Blessing is the theme here, not loss of salvation.
1 Timothy 4:16
16 Pay close attention to yourself and to the teaching; persevere in these things, for as you do this you will save both yourself and those who hear you.
Yes, because the false gospels of works-based salvation and salvation loss within the Gospel of Grace are indeed grievously false doctrines arising from a false foundation that cannot save anyone. How is one saved through a gospel no longer in force?
James 5:19-20
19 My brothers and sisters, if anyone among you strays from the truth and someone turns him back, 20 let him know that the one who has turned a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death and cover a multitude of sins.
Yes, James again speaking to the twelve tribes under the Kingdom Gospel. Repeating the same usage fallacy on your part doesn't magically transform your misguided use of James into a truth for us today. Where did James tell them that they are sealed by Holy Spirit as an earnest unto salvation? Come on. Let's get consistent with all this, shall we?
1 Corinthians 9:27
27 but I strictly discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified.
You erroneously assume salvation into that qualification. This is a very common fallacy among works-based salvationists, making salvation a matter of qualification rather than it being a gift. How pathetic this misapplication of yours really is.
John 15:1-5
1“I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser. 2 Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit, He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit, He [a]prunes it so that it may bear more fruit. 3 You are already [b]clean because of the word which I have spoken to you. 4 Remain in Me, [c]and I in you. Just as the branch cannot bear fruit [d]of itself [e]but must remain in the vine, so neither can you unless you remain in Me. 5 I am the vine, you are the branches; the one who remains in Me, and I in him [f]bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not remain in Me, he is thrown away like a branch and dries up; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.
No doubt that you can quote more and more verses out from their contexts, which makes it easier to apply your emotional appeals to salvation being the central theme they are all allegedly addressing, and yet are not. Shoving aside the crucial element of reward while ignoring the address of those who were not truly in the faith to begin with, such as the many pretenders within churchianity today, your case is amazingly shabby and bereft of substance., Please prove salvation is the central point of these verses in the way that YOU are trying to apply them.
MM
