Lauren Boebert Tries to Convince New District She’s Not All Drama

[Niki7]

The thing is though, she is a drama queen.

Just forget her last scandal and vote for the cowboy boots.

I'm thinking only a narcissist would not be embarrassed by the things she has been caught doing and just keep going like she is a valued member of the right Feel free to disagree with me


Colorado liberals, meanwhile, see Boebert as a potential boon. A recent poll by the left-leaning research group The Mountaineer found that just 17% of Colorado voters have a favorable view of her, less than half the 36% and 40% favorability ratings for Trump and Biden, respectively.

“Tying all Republicans to Boebert is a winning strategy for Democrats,” the group’s report concluded. source

 

[p_rehbein]

Honestly, I have never heard of her, sorry.

 

[Susanna]

Me neither.

 

[Niki7]

Honestly, I have never heard of her, sorry.

Not a problem. A good number of Republicans (I am not one but neither am I a Democrat) wish they had never heard of her either.

 

[p_rehbein]

Here is what I found:

Representative Lauren Boebert

WebLearn about the legislative achievements, issues, and activities of Rep. Boebert, the U.S. representative for Colorado's Third Congressional District. Find out how to contact her office, request a flag, apply for an internship,


Lauren Boebert Tries to Convince New District She’s Not All Drama
Web2 days ago · WSJ Barron's MarketWatch IBD Lauren Boebert Tries to Convince New District She’s Not All Drama Colorado Republican has fundraising and recognition advantages but …

 

[Niki7]

Here is what I found:

Representative Lauren Boebert

WebLearn about the legislative achievements, issues, and activities of Rep. Boebert, the U.S. representative for Colorado's Third Congressional District. Find out how to contact her office, request a flag, apply for an internship,


Lauren Boebert Tries to Convince New District She’s Not All Drama
Web2 days ago · WSJ Barron's MarketWatch IBD Lauren Boebert Tries to Convince New District She’s Not All Drama Colorado Republican has fundraising and recognition advantages but …

well I did put a link in my op. that's fine

I guess I thought people would know about her since she has been involved in a number of sexual scandals while calling herself a Christian...and other scandals as well.

but like I said, no worries

 

[stilllearning]

She's drama, I am over in the 5th District so not in her new District or old one. However, anecdotal of course I don't know any of my fellow republicans that speak favorable of her. I think we need someone better than her to represent conservatives in Colorado. As we go from California lite, to catching up with them and perhaps passing them with immoral laws in the state.

 

[p_rehbein]

She's drama, I am over in the 5th District so not in her new District or old one. However, anecdotal of course I don't know any of my fellow republicans that speak favorable of her. I think we need someone better than her to represent conservatives in Colorado. As we go from California lite, to catching up with them and perhaps passing them with immoral laws in the state.

Good info. However, wondering if you support Trump? I mean, given his sexual escapades and such, and the standard you hold this woman to?

 

[stilllearning]

Good info. However, wondering if you support Trump? I mean, given his sexual escapades and such, and the standard you hold this woman to?

What standard would that be I said she was drama and gave nothing beyond that. Isn't it foolish to assume what motivates me or drives me? Wouldn't you have been better served to ask me why I believe she is drama when I gave no reason why I believed so?

 

[Niki7]

Good info. However, wondering if you support Trump? I mean, given his sexual escapades and such, and the standard you hold this woman to?

Don't you have enough threads to discuss Trump in without trying to snag this thread also?

I don't think you are equipped (given other posts I have read from you) to attempt to discuss what goes on in the minds of others

 

[p_rehbein]

What standard would that be I said she was drama and gave nothing beyond that. Isn't it foolish to assume what motivates me or drives me? Wouldn't you have been better served to ask me why I believe she is drama when I gave no reason why I believed so?

You said:

. I think we need someone better than her to represent conservatives in Colorado. As we go from California lite, to catching up with them and perhaps passing them with immoral laws in the state.

This suggested to me you had a standard you held her to for such a statement. If not, fine, but you must have had some reason for believing you needed "someone better," right?

 

[stilllearning]

You said:

. I think we need someone better than her to represent conservatives in Colorado. As we go from California lite, to catching up with them and perhaps passing them with immoral laws in the state.

This suggested to me you had a standard you held her to for such a statement. If not, fine, but you must have had some reason for believing you needed "someone better," right?

You can drop the pretense there guy. The oh my whatever do you mean nonsense. Your skirt hike attack was blatant and obvious. Your little passive aggressive character assassination attempt was unneeded. I think the conservative message is the better message. While Christ is the only answer period for mankind and every thing that ails us.

In this secular battle of competing ideology for the soul of a nation. I find the conservative message is the better. So I dislike drama or politicians that end up being a bigger story than the conservative message. I think it takes away from the message.

So yeah if your next response is well Trump is drama, I agree. I had every intention to vote for Vivek in our primary in my state. Because to me he has the same message, can articulate it better and does not come with the drama. Trump was gonna win period that is a given. To which I will vote for him and just as I would also vote for Lauren is she was the nominee and I in her district.

I said we deserve better and I'm talking about a person that the message is the story rather than them. However, if my choice is a person who I find they are drama, yet they carry the message. I will find them the better choice than the message of immorality and degeneracy that is the Democratic platform.

The legislation of immorality here in Colorado that is longer story. However, I don't like at all that Colorado is leading the nation to be the first to legislate some absolute garbage, things that are downright sin. So yeah in the total scheme I like the ones that are going to represent me and the conservative message to not end up being a bigger story than the conservative message.

So there was no need for your passive aggressive and your now pretense of pitiful gaslighting defense of it. I don't mind at all to explain and define what I mean and just what I am saying.

 

[Niki7]

This suggested to me you had a standard you held her to for such a statement. If not, fine, but you must have had some reason for believing you needed "someone better," right?

What motivates you here? First off you say you never heard of Boebert so instead you would like to do an in depth study of someone who has heard of her?

For the record, I really have not had the opportunity to post very much to stilllearning but I have seen quite a bit from you and your opinions on Trump are not positive. However, this was really a thread about someone who says they are a Christian hence my op. This is not about politics but you decide to go that direction.

You can use your favorite search engine to look up Boebert and learn something instead of razzing someone who apparently does know who she is.

All conservatives do not wear a Trump tatoo and it is tiresome to try and label everyone who perhaps will vote for Trump as a MAGA nutcase.

wondering if you support Trump? I mean, given his sexual escapades and such, and the standard you hold this woman to?

Really? Quite a leap from the actual op

 

[Niki7]

I said we deserve better and I'm talking about a person that the message is the story rather than them. However, if my choice is a person who I find they are drama, yet they carry the message. I will find them the better choice than the message of immorality and degeneracy that is the Democratic platform.

 

[p_rehbein]

You can drop the pretense there guy. The oh my whatever do you mean nonsense. Your skirt hike attack was blatant and obvious. Your little passive aggressive character assassination attempt was unneeded. I think the conservative message is the better message. While Christ is the only answer period for mankind and every thing that ails us.

In this secular battle of competing ideology for the soul of a nation. I find the conservative message is the better. So I dislike drama or politicians that end up being a bigger story than the conservative message. I think it takes away from the message.

So yeah if your next response is well Trump is drama, I agree. I had every intention to vote for Vivek in our primary in my state. Because to me he has the same message, can articulate it better and does not come with the drama. Trump was gonna win period that is a given. To which I will vote for him and just as I would also vote for Lauren is she was the nominee and I in her district.

I said we deserve better and I'm talking about a person that the message is the story rather than them. However, if my choice is a person who I find they are drama, yet they carry the message. I will find them the better choice than the message of immorality and degeneracy that is the Democratic platform.

The legislation of immorality here in Colorado that is longer story. However, I don't like at all that Colorado is leading the nation to be the first to legislate some absolute garbage, things that are downright sin. So yeah in the total scheme I like the ones that are going to represent me and the conservative message to not end up being a bigger story than the conservative message.

So there was no need for your passive aggressive and your now pretense of pitiful gaslighting defense of it. I don't mind at all to explain and define what I mean and just what I am saying.

This is too, too funny......goodness (a wee bit of knowledge truly is a dangerous thing)

 

[p_rehbein]

I said we deserve better and I'm talking about a person that the message is the story rather than them. However, if my choice is a person who I find they are drama, yet they carry the message. I will find them the better choice than the message of immorality and degeneracy that is the Democratic platform.

...and, this is a "standard" used to determine if you would vote for her or not. Which is what I asked for in the beginning.

Your skirt hike attack

that is too, too funny

 

[p_rehbein]

You can use your favorite search engine to look up Boebert and learn something instead of razzing someone who apparently does know who she is.

All conservatives do not wear a Trump tatoo and it is tiresome to try and label everyone who perhaps will vote for Trump as a MAGA nutcase.

Perchance you noticed I provided Links to Articles about the Lady and gave anyone who had not heard of her a chance to read about her? No?

"razzing someone?" By simply asking what standard she used to determine if she would vote for the Lady? Here's a wee bit of truth. If you guys are this thin skinned, you are surely on the wrong Site. Nothing of what I wrote could even begin to come close to the accusations you guys made.

God bless, and have a wonderful day

 

[Niki7]

Perchance you noticed I provided Links to Articles about the Lady and gave anyone who had not heard of her a chance to read about her? No?

"razzing someone?" By simply asking what standard she used to determine if she would vote for the Lady? Here's a wee bit of truth. If you guys are this thin skinned, you are surely on the wrong Site. Nothing of what I wrote could even begin to come close to the accusations you guys made.

God bless, and have a wonderful day

I just love it when someone snarks at you and then tells you to have a wonderful day.

I provided links and since you said you knew nothing about her, but tried to get a Trump bashing thread diversion going, why did you ever even bother to respond? Why ask totally unrelated questions to someone, and determine you knew things they did not say?

Keep telling yourself that you are as pure as the driven snow. You are not helping yourself and I am done responding to someone whose motives I now question.

 

[Niki7]

So someone comes along and totally puts the thread off track and manages to put all the attention on themself.

I hope that at some point people would actually participate instead of trying to somehow put themself in charge of other peoples threads.

I have long given up any idea of actually starting a thread that would discuss the Bible in a way that brings fruit and instead post something that basically just offers facts about something....same thing happens. Someone diverts and discusses other people instead of the op. Then tries to flip it and say it was everyone else.

Sadly, my ignore list gets longer is about all that happens.

 

[stilllearning]

By simply asking what standard she used to determine if she would vote for the Lady?

The "she" might have registered as at least an attempt at a insult if your side of the aisle wasn't still trying to identify what is a man and what is a woman.....LOL How many genders are there now? Have the dems decided if gender is a fluid, a solid, or a gas yet....LOL