Like an advent calender lolI used this observation, "None of them were camping outside his tomb and counting down to his resurrection on Sunday."![]()
Like an advent calender lolI used this observation, "None of them were camping outside his tomb and counting down to his resurrection on Sunday."![]()
Yes he went to Jews also .To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews.
I think earlier on there were only synagogue sThat does not mean that he had a gospel which was different from that of Christ, or Peter, or any other apostle. It simply meant that he was commissioned to preach to the Gentiles. Yet you will find that Paul invariably visited the synagogues first in his travels, and first preached to the Jews, then the Gentiles. That destroys any idea that Paul had a different gospel.
Is luke 9.6 the same as Paul's gospel?That does not mean that he had a gospel which was different from that of Christ, or Peter, or any other apostle. It simply meant that he was commissioned to preach to the Gentiles. Yet you will find that Paul invariably visited the synagogues first in his travels, and first preached to the Jews, then the Gentiles. That destroys any idea that Paul had a different gospel.
Through various discussions on the board here. It seems there is a view that there are two gospels.
Basically it says that Jesus taught a different gospel than that of Paul. Are there two gospels? One that Jesus taught then a different one that Paul taught?
The burden is on those claiming Paul means ' another gospel ' in the sense of there being ONLY one . Rather what the verses ACTUALLY SAY is ' other than the one they delivered to them 'That does not mean that he had a gospel which was different from that of Christ, or Peter, or any other apostle. It simply meant that he was commissioned to preach to the Gentiles. Yet you will find that Paul invariably visited the synagogues first in his travels, and first preached to the Jews, then the Gentiles. That destroys any idea that Paul had a different gospel.
You mean to say all of us are given the same good news that we shall have descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky (Genesis 15:5)?
So Paul was not just an apostle to/for the Gentiles.Yes he went to Jews also .
The burden is on those claiming Paul means ' another gospel ' in the sense of there being ONLY one . Rather what the verses ACTUALLY SAY is ' other than the one they delivered to them '
Well, and don't forget the fact that none *before* Abraham had "good news," right?? They are all "lost" [/unsaved] (something like 2000-yrs'-worth of ppl) because "the good news" *first* came to Abraham... [??] but not before him?? (not saying *you've* suggested this, to be clear)
= D ... okay...
Like an advent calender lol
He was an apostle to the gentiles . like he said . Like Jesus said .So Paul was not just an apostle to/for the Gentiles.
Romans 11:13
“For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:”
That does not preclude Paul from being an apostle to others.He was an apostle to the gentiles . like he said . Like Jesus said .
That does not preclude Paul from being an apostle to others.He was an apostle to the gentiles . like he said . Like Jesus said .
Which verse though?That does not preclude Paul from being an apostle to others.
I used this observation, "None of them were camping outside his tomb and counting down to his resurrection on Sunday."![]()
In fact paul went to the jews first in ever city he visited on his missionary journeysThat does not preclude Paul from being an apostle to others.
Did you not just agree that Paul evangelized Jews also?