Women became part of Israel the same way as men - by faith.Women could obviously become Israel apart from cicumcision, like Ruth and Rahab, but no man could.
Women became part of Israel the same way as men - by faith.Women could obviously become Israel apart from cicumcision, like Ruth and Rahab, but no man could.
Women became part of Israel the same way as men - by faith.
Israel means .... he who struggles with El.Its the same people, the Church, and Israel being redeemed from all iniquity ! No not ethnic national israel, they were a type, a shadow, but Spiritual Israel, Christ's and Abrahams Spiritual seed.10
Okay it's still the church the body of Christ.Israel means .... he who struggles with El.
.... He that wrestles with God. And prevails.
Jacob wrestled with God and his name was changed.
This is pretty good but we don't become spiritual Israel by something that we did, we are manifested as being of spiritual Israel by what we do by taking hold of Christ !The blood line is not what gives us the blessing. By a relationship and by struggling with God we resieve the blessing. By not letting God go, like Jacob, unless your blessed you become Spiritual Isreal.
Having power with God and prevailing.
Gods kingdom is not of this world.
I think the scriptures say otherwise.You're speaking of spiritual Israel. Any man in the world could become part of natural Israel without faith by becoming circumcised and following the law, but no man could become part of spiritual Israel apart from the physical act of circumcision.
I think the scriptures say otherwise.
Romans 4: 8 - 13
8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.
9 Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.
10 How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.
11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:
12 And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.
13 For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.
Paul's actually talking about Abraham, the first guy to receive circumcision as "a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised". So there's that...No it doesn't because I've been talking about the old covenant. Paul is referring to those under the new covennt in which physical circumcision is nothing.
Paul's actually talking about Abraham, the first guy to receive circumcision as "a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised". So there's that...
I think you're getting it backward by focusing on circumcision, which is the point. Abraham, the father of all believers, believed before any of his works. Works such as circumcision were simply an outward expression of that faith.And when the covenant of circumcision was in force no man could become a part of natural or spiritual Israel without being circumcised. Talking around that point is just wasting time and going in circles
I think you're getting it backward by focusing on circumcision, which is the point. Abraham, the father of all believers, believed before any of his works. Works such as circumcision were simply an outward expression of that faith.
Deuteronomy 10:16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked.
Moses, while believing, somehow neglected to circumcise his son. God intervened through Moses' wife in order to save him.
The work to become a participant in the promise of God is to believe in the One whom God sent.Circumcision was obedience to God's command. It wasn't merely a symbolic expression of faith; it was what sealed a man into the people of God. It was not a work to be justifed; it was a work to become a participant in the promises of God
The work to become a participant in the promise of God is to believe in the One whom God sent.
The work to become a participant in the promise of God is to believe in the One whom God sent.
Yes. Thank you @HeIsHere. As in Abraham's case.Would you also say, the promise of His coming?
My understanding was that uncircumcision was a capital crime. The foreskin had to be removed, with or without the rest of the male. But there were other capital crimes such as murder and adultery, and we see the punishment for these weren't always strictly administered. Based on this, I don't see it as impossible that some might get away with uncircumcision in natural Israel.That is under the new covenant.
If you want to keep talking about this, please directly address the point I made that when the old covenant was in force no man could become a member of Israel and share in the promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob without being circumcised.
Yes. Thank you @HeIsHere. As in Abraham's case.
My understanding was that uncircumcision was a capital crime. The foreskin had to be removed, with or without the rest of the male. But there were other capital crimes such as murder and adultery, and we see the punishment for these weren't always strictly administered. Based on this, I don't see it as impossible that some might get away with uncircumcision in natural Israel.
If we're talking about sharing in God's promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, I think that reverts the discussion to spiritual Israel again?
The foreskin was to be "cut off" via circumcision. However, if not the foreskin, the whole man was to be "cut off" from Israel. Not sure how you don't see the parallel?It is nowhere stated in scripture that uncircumcision was a capital crime. Not being circumcised cut one's soul off from Israel. In other words, the uncircumcised were not sharers in the promises of God.
The foreskin was to be "cut off" via circumcision. However, if not the foreskin, the whole man was to be "cut off" from Israel. Not sure how you don't see the parallel?
What was to happen to Moses because of his son's uncircumcision? Was God going to kill him, or simply exile him?You're reading into the text that "cut off" means capital punishment, even though it dpesn't say that. It would have been much simpler to circumcise a man or send him into exile than to kill him.
Circumcision is what sealed men of Israel into the people of God. It was the seal of the covenant; it was their very identity as belonging to the people of Abraham. Those who were not sealed were cut off by God from the promises .
And you shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a seal of the covenant between me and you. Genesis 17:11And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant. Genesis 17:14