they would not longer be muslims then correct?
Becoming unchained from a demonic religion into freedom. I hope many more come to Christ.
they would not longer be muslims then correct?
well I was a baptist.Correct!
Like when a baptist gets converted, they are no longer baptist.
well I was a baptist.
While I do not consider myself a baptist any longer. i was still converted as a baptist.
So...what promise was fulfilled in Joshua 21:43?Yes, I believe so. We use to sing hymns that backed up these foundational doctrines. But since the church has moved to repetitive worship music, much of these truths have been lost.
Yes, true on both counts, but God said He would put them in the land never to be uprooted again. That hasn't happened yet. Therefore the promise has not yet been fulfilled.
So...what promise was fulfilled in Joshua 21:43?
So...what promise was fulfilled in Joshua 21:43?
He looks for things which support his antisemetism
lolWhen you accuse of anti-semitism it is because you have no argument so you follow leftist tactics.
Unlike many on here I am not interested in groups or the vilification of groups/people, yet there is a history that has been left largely covered up by people with power and money. I seek to expose the other side of the situation, since most seem to think there is only one side.
On that note farewell.
A person who cannot see the implications of spreading of the lie of forty beheaded babies, and not aware this lie was being used so as to justify more ethnic cleansing is not a person I want to converse with nor do I want to read their polemics.
Thankfully free speech has shown this lie to be indeed a lie.
I appreciate the sourcing, but I can research on my own. Can you put in a couple of sentences which promise it refers to? A Bible reference would be great.Are you up for a bit of a long read? Too much here to simply copy and paste.
https://tms.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/tmsj23d.pdf
He looks for things which support his antisemetism
View attachment 257064
Dispensationalist view with no examination of the other side of the argument.
I appreciate the sourcing, but I can research on my own. Can you put in a couple of sentences which promise it refers to? A Bible reference would be great.
People who make that claim do not know what is actually in the Abrahamic Covenant. When God said "from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates" He meant from the Nile of the Euphrates. That is the true extent of Greater Israel, and that has never come into existence. Plus Israel was absent from Palestine for almost 2,000 years, whereas the Covenant is an everlasting covenant.Maps, facts, prove you wrong. They have never fully possessed the all the land.
Take your time, and by all means, look after your health.I understand, but HisH is lying about the content and how it's handled. I could definitely give you the source but didn't see your question before I was rudely interrupted. I don't hide what I believe, ever. I am always direct. Let me get back to your question asap. This flu has got me down and I cannot stop coughing. Think I will try some hot soup and see if that helps. I will answer your question though.
People who make that claim do not know what is actually in the Abrahamic Covenant. When God said "from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates" He meant from the Nile of the Euphrates. That is the true extent of Greater Israel, and that has never come into existence. Plus Israel was absent from Palestine for almost 2,000 years, whereas the Covenant is an everlasting covenant.
Are you up for a bit of a long read? Too much here to simply copy and paste.
https://tms.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/tmsj23d.pdf
One things is sure. We are seeing people for who they are. Their true self is being openly displayed. They can not hide anymore.Quote "A person who cannot see the implications of spreading of the lie of forty beheaded babies, and not aware this lie was being used so as to justify more ethnic cleansing is not a person I want to converse with nor do I want to read their polemics."
Unverified does not mean a lie. But it's funny how people leaped on that story to deny every other horrific thing that has been done to the Jews. Their reasoning is one story is unverified so raping women and dragging them through the streets is ok, that taking babies hostage, not a problem, that murdering 200 people at a concert, justified, murdering children in front of parents, a ok. Just as long as we can hold on to one story we can justify the slaughter of Jews, the worst since the Holocaust. We're more worried about the innocent "Palestinians" in a land that was never theirs in the first place and we'll twist every Scripture that we believe proves the land isn't there's and pull stories from random antisemitic sites to back up our POV. Really Christian Antisemitism is the worst, it's deeper, far more entrenched and brain washed. A grave pity, one day they will see when God makes a promise, He will keep it, to Jew or Gentile.
No one said that they dont have a right to self defense.
This is a straw-man argument.