I thought Jesus and the apostles were responsible for that teaching.Many seem to believe Darby is responsible for the idea of a pre-tribulation rapture.
I thought Jesus and the apostles were responsible for that teaching.Many seem to believe Darby is responsible for the idea of a pre-tribulation rapture.
I am just relaying the facts of what I see when people argue these things.I thought Jesus and the apostles were responsible for that teaching.
I thought Jesus and the apostles were responsible for that teaching.
3. If the Palestinians renounced the stated goal to exterminate the Jews and vowed allegiance to the state of Israel could they become citizens and live in Israel?
I thought Jesus and the apostles were responsible for that teaching.
Are there unbiased sources? It's such a mess and been going on so very, very long.It isn't difficult to search the internet for a concise history of it all... you just have to give up preconceived notions.
I'm open to anything. But my question would be: why haven't they done it? I think it is a reasonable position to say Israel wants the annihilation of Hamas. I don't think they desire the annihilation of Palestinians. But that's just my take. Getting rid of the Palestinians doesn't rid Israel of hateful neighbors.Could you consider that Israel might be bent on the destruction of Palestine?
Are there unbiased sources? It's such a mess and been going on so very, very long.
The bulk of Christians were paying indulgences prior to Martin Luther, that doesn't really mean anything to me. What does the NT say? Yes, like you say, this should be in another thread.No... the bulk of Christian thought on eschatology before Darby had no rapture, no great tribulation, and no Mil. Kingdom. But there were also many that did believe some or all of those things.
This should be in a seperate thread...
I'm open to anything. But my question would be: why haven't they done it? I think it is a reasonable position to say Israel wants the annihilation of Hamas. I don't think they desire the annihilation of Palestinians. But that's just my take. Getting rid of the Palestinians doesn't rid Israel of hateful neighbors.
Those represent results. Do you have a chart showing the number of unprovoked attacks?
Yes I read a history of 1948 and it was clear that both sides were involved in terrorist activity and even one of the Israeli Prime ministers had been involved in a terrorist act earlier in his life.My (limited) understanding of this point is that many Palestinians aren't looking for Israels destruction... though for the last few decades they have kinda' become the proxy that you say. But it doesn't hold true for "all".
Most believe that Israel's formation was against the UN plan at the time... there's evidence for this.
They also claim that Israel was heavily engaged in terroristic activities with the local Arabs in the region pre-1948... there's supporting evidence for this as well.
For the most part, the citizens want their land back (which is doubtful it could ever happen as substantial develop has already occurred).
It isn't difficult to search the internet for a concise history of it all... you just have to give up preconceived notions.
Was this before or after all of Israel's neighbors tried to take their land by force?I would think that international disapproval would be one of the leading reasons. Arab nations threats against it. UN disapproval has been clear since 1948... Israel defied the UN's plan and took much more land than was proposed... by force.
There is no nation called Palistine. So who's land was taken?I would think that international disapproval would be one of the leading reasons. Arab nations threats against it. UN disapproval has been clear since 1948... Israel defied the UN's plan and took much more land than was proposed... by force.
Those are written into Islam's so-called "holy" books.I would think that international disapproval would be one of the leading reasons.
Arab nations threats against it. UN disapproval has been clear since 1948... Israel
defied the UN's plan and took much more land than was proposed... by force.
I'm open to anything. But my question would be: why haven't they done it? I think it is a reasonable position to say Israel wants the annihilation of Hamas. I don't think they desire the annihilation of Palestinians. But that's just my take. Getting rid of the Palestinians doesn't rid Israel of hateful neighbors.
They named it Palestine to try and erase Israel from the history books, so it was Israel's land that was taken.There is no nation called Palistine. So who's land was taken?
There is no nation called Palistine. So who's land was taken?
Was this before or after all of Israel's neighbors tried to take their land by force?
Mostly untrue, not 100%. Lebanon is a neighbor, Syria is a neighbor, and Jordan is a neighbor. All three of these countries have supported and/or housed terrorists as well as had terrorist actions perpetrated from their land on Israel.The neighbors are not all hateful, that is untrue, and the tensions in the area are tied to larger geopolitical issues.