According to your idea of the garden and creation. You cannot prove your point with scripture.
And saying the fruit of the forbidden tree was grapes, doesn't actually comport with scripture either. The fruit of that tree is never identified in scripture.
To say it was grapes is an enormous interpolation on your part. I don't think you realize that if that were the fruit, and all that you've said as pertains to the grape, then what of Jesus when, as His first miracle recorded in the Book of John, He turned casks of water into wine during the wedding at caanan?
Sadly, and I do mean sadly, they do not talk about Scripture, handle Scripture correctly, look at the Scriptural arguments proving our position, glorifying God &c. The continuance of name calling the doctrines, ridicule, malice, shameful responses, ignorance? That's what is concentrated on in the many responses against said biblical truths. That is the fruit I'm seeing.
So what I hear you saying is that you believe that Jesus Christ is who He said He is, the Son Of God, and did what he said He did, die for our sin, and was resurrected to life, because of your intellect and wisdom in figuring out that the Bible was true, and other religions were false.
So is it fair to say you came to Christ because you were smart enough to realize that the Word is true?
And if that is true, isn't it also fair to say that you could boast because of that intellect? And others who are not as smart as you can't figure it out?
And if that is not true, then the question remains. Why do YOU believe?
I agree with your conclusion and so does the poll.Not yet studied Greek here but the English, saving faith is not a mere profession but rather a possession. To receive is to get or come into possession. Accepting this is true, perhaps the Greek for the two means the same. But of course, this is not to force, you have either to believe it or not.![]()
Agreed. If God forced Adam or Eve or Satan then God is the author or evil and the cause of the fall against His design. Very contradictory to God's nature. These debates are so silly but fun to see how people try to explain free will away but at the same time philosophically proving it as they think, reason and disagree.I think the argument that says man has not free will forgets the fall in the garden. Adam exercised free will, choice, when he was persuaded to eat of the fruit, which is never identified in scripture but is commonly thought to be an apple, which Eve offered him.
And Eve made a free will choice when she was persuaded by the serpent to eat of that tree first, knowing God had forbidden it to them, and after hearing the serpents argument for eating thereof, which countered God's command, the first law of God, not to eat.
Sadly, it appears only Calvinists and certain , if not all, of the Reformed Doctrinaires believe they have no free will.
Which can be understood when they accept the tenets in the TULIP formula. All five points of TULIP refute man having free will. And all things that happen to man, under TULIP, is God's doing.
So really, it is a part of their agreement with the doctrine they've accepted as truth, when they state they have no free will.
I think it would be funny if people's souls weren't involved.Agreed. If God forced Adam or Eve or Satan then God is the author or evil and the cause of the fall against His design. Very contradictory to God's nature. These debates are so silly but fun to see how people try to explain free will away but at the same time philosophically proving it as they think, reason and disagree.
Moses bringing the plagues into Egypt was purposeful through God's workings against Pharoah and the polytheist idolatry Egyptians clung to. That's why God hardened Pharaoh's heart, and told Moses of this, before He sent Moses forth into Egypt.Moses first miracle was turning water to blood.
Jesus first miracle was turning water to wine, a type of blood.
What scripture? Which one? Please post the scripture that says, vine tree. Thank you in advance.Scripture says a vine tree. Google images, you’ll see.
Moses first miracle was turning water to blood.
Jesus first miracle was turning water to wine, a type of blood.
They have ears but they do not hear, can't because they were made totally depraved first. They have eyes but they do not see, same reason. Romans 10:17: "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God."
AMEN!
Thomas Coke Commentary on the Holy BibleProverbs 20:12
The hearing ear and the seeing eye, The LORD has made them both.
how this is connected to Romans 10:17?
it testifies of Christ - what other pieces do we need to see Him at work in these two truths?
Nice post. I am in agreement with what you have said. My daughter is 60 years old now and was diagnosed with RA in her youth, but went into remission in her puberty years and it came back in a fury 8 years ago. She had to quit her job with the Texas lottery Service and filed for disability. I, also, am not Arminian nor do I follow Calvin's beliefs.
That's a good, Christian, biblical and thoughtful post bro. Keep them coming!here is what Romans 11:32 has to do with "man can't be depraved because an Omni-benevolent & omniscient God created him after His image and likeness"
we'll call that statement A
A presumes that it is not good that man is concluded under sin.
the scripture says, God concluded all under sin.
if A is true then Romans 11:32 either isn't true, or it doesn't mean anything like what it literally says.
that 's what it has to do with your remarks.
the scripture says God concluded us all in sin, in unbelief. and it says why He did so: in order that He might have mercy on us all.
Jesus Christ is the righteousness and the demonstration of the mercy of God:
For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. (Romans 3:22-26)scripture says why He concluded all under sin, and it is good: in order that He might show mercy to all. in order demonstrate His righteousness. in order that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Him. in order that boasting be excluded. in order that all things be to His glory.
consider the situation when Adam and the woman became poisoned by sin. He could have destroyed them in condemnation immediately, and be just. but in His mercy He pronounced the judgement of The Seed and cursed the ground for Adam's sake. and Adam understood, and changed her name to Eve.
God allowed you and i to have existence.
in order to have mercy on us.
in order to demonstrate His righteousness.
in order to be just and The Justifier of us whosoever has faith in Him.
in order to make the riches of His glory known to the vessels He created for His mercy.
in order to make His great power and patience known.
in order that boasting be excluded.
in order to work all things together for His good.
because it is His good pleasure.
because everything He does is good.
because He does all His will.
because He knows and declares the end from the beginning.
because His word doesn't go out without accomplishing its purpose.
because He is the Beginning and the End.
i hope that makes sense now?
would you mind telling me what you think Romans 11:32 means?
thanks![]()
"Primitive Baptist" church.oh really?
is this where you deviate from all that limited atonement nonsense?
I mean if you are one of the elect, you are one of the elect no matter where you may be in life
so really, he was always saved in your economy
just more word salad and the dressing is past it's best before date
you belong to possibly an even worse group...the Baptist whatever you call yourselves![]()
I am not really a fan of studying Greek or of using Greek Lexicon, I study English. For discussion sake, Kittel, as translated by Geoffrey Bromiley, has this to say regards to the Greek "lambano" p440I agree with your conclusion and so does the poll.
Nothing unless you read the entire chapter so as to put one line from that chapter into context.here is what Romans 11:32 has to do with "man can't be depraved because an Omni-benevolent & omniscient God created him after His image and likeness"
we'll call that statement A
A presumes that it is not good that man is concluded under sin.
the scripture says, God concluded all under sin.
if A is true then Romans 11:32 either isn't true, or it doesn't mean anything like what it literally says.
that 's what it has to do with your remarks.
the scripture says God concluded us all in sin, in unbelief. and it says why He did so: in order that He might have mercy on us all.
Jesus Christ is the righteousness and the demonstration of the mercy of God:
For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. (Romans 3:22-26)scripture says why He concluded all under sin, and it is good: in order that He might show mercy to all. in order demonstrate His righteousness. in order that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Him. in order that boasting be excluded. in order that all things be to His glory.
consider the situation when Adam and the woman became poisoned by sin. He could have destroyed them in condemnation immediately, and be just. but in His mercy He pronounced the judgement of The Seed and cursed the ground for Adam's sake. and Adam understood, and changed her name to Eve.
God allowed you and i to have existence.
in order to have mercy on us.
in order to demonstrate His righteousness.
in order to be just and The Justifier of us whosoever has faith in Him.
in order to make the riches of His glory known to the vessels He created for His mercy.
in order to make His great power and patience known.
in order that boasting be excluded.
in order to work all things together for His good.
because it is His good pleasure.
because everything He does is good.
because He does all His will.
because He knows and declares the end from the beginning.
because His word doesn't go out without accomplishing its purpose.
because He is the Beginning and the End.
i hope that makes sense now?
would you mind telling me what you think Romans 11:32 means?
thanks![]()
TULIP is not refuted by scripture. TULIP is re-inforced by scripture.I think it would be funny if people's souls weren't involved.
TULIP cannot be defined and defended as God's plan using proper exegesis and Soteriology.
The tragic and I mean really tragic part of TULIP defenders exhortations , be they Piper or some other adherent in the pulpit or on YouTube, or just supposed faithful in online forums is this. They do not realize the image and likeness of the god they worship under that mantel is not only not the actual God of Abraham but is His adversary; Satan.
Unless or until those devotees find their way to the light of Christ, they're doomed.
They have ears but they do not hear, can't because they were made totally depraved first. They have eyes but they do not see, same reason. Romans 10:17: "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God."
The reality of their conviction however insures they shall not do so. Because they first and foremost believe, they are incapable in and of themselves. They believe that the god of TULIP has put them where he wants them to be.
God would that none should perish.
TULIP says, its god predetermined damnation after he predetermined whom he'd rescue from that fate. Then he'd make them to be in his grace, and he'd make them to have faith in him. So that forever in this life they shall ever remain saved from the condition TULIP's god created for them.
This is why people hearing of the OSAS (Once Saved Always Saved) doctrine and who are not of the TULIP formula denounce it as not of God.
I think it is because of the smear TULIP has put upon it. Perseverance of its saints, saved no matter what they do, being they are still totally depraved, but....saved....having faith.....in the grace.....the god that thinks total depravity + grace+faith ='s salvation.
Is it any wonder John Calvin was an unrepentant accomplice to premeditated first degree murder of Michael Servetus?
He was in the service of his TULIP god.
And right he was too.
That's how we know TULIP's god is not our God.
As if we need more scripture.
Of course, we always need more scripture.
THE CALVINIST T. U. L. I. P.
REFUTED BY SCRIPTURE
Compiled by John Henry