N
NoNameMcgee
Guest
The prodigal already recieved his inheritance, he came back to his father with wood hay and straw, (empty) yet he was always his fathers son.
Spot on brother.
The prodigal already recieved his inheritance, he came back to his father with wood hay and straw, (empty) yet he was always his fathers son.
What Father would not, if the son died away from his family, would not go get his sons body and bring him home where he belongs?Spot on brother.
The gift of tongues was in fact the spiritual gift of supernaturally speaking known human languages without ever having learned them (see Acts 2).
Had the KJV translators simply used the word *language (s)* they would have been perfectly in accord with what is revealed. However, since *tongues* was a common translation for languages at that time, we find it used in Scripture.
So you have not made any earth-shaking discovery, but simply confirmed that babbling is NOT the spiritual gift of tongues. That is why an interpreter was necessary as confirmed by Paul. And that spiritual gift would cease when the Bible had been completed.
if they leave us they were never of us 1 John 2:19The prodigal son Had to Return to His father and acknowledge his sin.. If the prodigal son had never come back and died in that foreign land he would have never received an inheritance..
Some people abandon the Father and never come back..
There is no such thing as "replacement theology". That Israel is the church in the new covenant is obvious from the scriptures I posted
Galatians 3:28-29 (KJV)
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
In the current dispensation after the resurrection, the above verses you quoted are true. But, there are specific promised the Lord has given to the nation of Israel that cannot be placed upon the body of Christ. He will continue His plan for that nation after catching up of the church.
Dispensationalism is a farce. God has never changed in how He deals with His people. Only two covenants were made by God with His people,....the old covenant with the Jews and the new covenant of grace with all believers. (the new replacing the old)
Do you make sacrifices? Have you built an ark lately? Why not? God's required that of His people in the past. Have you been confronted with the mark of the beast?
Just about anyone can call them self a Christian these days. And believe me, they have the scripture to back up their position.
Even an atheist can use the Bible to back up his position it seems.
The Bible is open to a lot of different interpretations. I myself don't have a perfect understanding so I'm still trying to understand.
Dispensationalism is a farce. God has never changed in how He deals with His people. Only two covenants were made by God with His people,....the old covenant with the Jews and the new covenant of grace with all believers. (the new replacing the old)
You make little sense.
ONE covenant is now in effect. Effective at the cross.
......and I don't buy into the crazy views of Darby and Scofield (father of dispensationalism) who promoted that idea of a premillenianism
Dis;pensatioonalism is a product of the 19th and 20th century,.......beware of NEW doctrine, it comes from the pit of hell.
I see. So you're saying that because I don't understand the Bible perfectly, it means I don't have the holy spirit?The bible is only truly understandable by the light of the Holy Spirit.
Keep reading the bible, the light might go on.
Hi sis! Haven't talked to you in a long time! How's "Dad"?I see. So you're saying that because I don't understand the Bible perfectly, it means I don't have the holy spirit?
Cool. Jamaican.I see. So you're saying that because I don't understand the Bible perfectly, it means I don't have the holy spirit?
There is no such thing as "replacement theology". That Israel is the church in the new covenant is obvious from the scriptures I posted
Galatians 3:28-29 (KJV)
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Are the two covenants the same? Did God change the way He dealt with man under the two covenants? Simply put, yes, God does change, but His character does not. God destroyed the earth with a flood. God declared He'll never do that again. God changed the way He deals with man.