Can we each concede that either interpretation is reasonable from the language?I would disagree. It suggests that God knows all that He will do in the future from the beginning.
Can we each concede that either interpretation is reasonable from the language?I would disagree. It suggests that God knows all that He will do in the future from the beginning.
LOL, it is not all found in scriptureAnd it's all found in scripture. We can read about how it's going to finish up.
Special pleading is alogical fallacy.But we are talking about GOD, not someone who holds to open theism. In the Divine Nature of God, he is omniscience
the context to this Attribute is Omni" means "all" and "science" refers to knowledge, so "omniscience" literally translates to "all-knowing."
Fully and completely without Limitations. Human rationality cannot demolish GOD nature.
Special pleading is alogical fallacy.
That ''He does not know all future events'' stands. (Genesis 22:12)
that He knows all things past present and future, stands.
Isaiah 46:10
No weaknesses? Your denying Him of the fact of his weaknesses if you maintain He had none, for some of them are declared openly, ''but emptied Himself, having taken the form of a servant, having been made in the likeness of men.''(2Cr 12:9) How is the strength to do that NOT ''made perfect'' in that weakness. Not to mention that it is His own doing to ''search the hearts'' Your 'know all things' (1John 3:20) is therefore subject to just such an action.If you believe that God has weaknesses, then I question who your "god" is.
Those early verses pertain to the Son. I was talking about God the Father. Go ahead. List some of his weaknesses.No weaknesses? Your denying Him of the fact of his weaknesses if you maintain He had none, for some of them are declared openly, ''but emptied Himself, having taken the form of a servant, having been made in the likeness of men.''(2Cr 12:9) How is the strength to do that NOT ''made perfect'' in that weakness. Not to mention that it is His own doing to ''search the hearts'' Your 'know all things' (1John 3:20) is therefore subject to just such an action.
I'm not sure it does, but I can concede more investigation is in order.Can we each concede that either interpretation is reasonable from the language?
No weaknesses? Your denying Him of the fact of his weaknesses if you maintain He had none, for some of them are declared openly, ''but emptied Himself, having taken the form of a servant, having been made in the likeness of men.''(2Cr 12:9) How is the strength to do that NOT ''made perfect'' in that weakness. Not to mention that it is His own doing to ''search the hearts'' Your 'know all things' (1John 3:20) is therefore subject to just such an action. 1 Cor 1:25If you believe that God has weaknesses, then I question who your "god" is.
No weaknesses? Your denying Him of the fact of his weaknesses if you maintain He had none, for some of them are declared openly, ''but emptied Himself, having taken the form of a servant, having been made in the likeness of men.''(2Cr 12:9) How is the strength to do that NOT ''made perfect'' in that weakness. Not to mention that it is His own doing to ''search the hearts'' Your 'know all things' (1John 3:20) is therefore subject to just such an action.
God sent Jonah to tell Nineveh to repent even though he knew they would not?
No prob with that, He laid it down. So, you can't quite accept He did in fact that emptying?LOL. You don't know the doctrine of Kenosis
First off, Jesus said 18 No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This command I have received from My Father.” John 10:18 Willful submission is not a weakness. It is Meekness.
and the likeness of something is not an admission of accepting all of the likenesses. God became man; man did not become GOD.
The weakness was in enduring the cross period.
Option #3 (the truth): God didn't reveal everything that He knew or had decided.
Proverbs 25:2a It is the glory of God to conceal a matter
If John can say that Christians have an anointing and know all things, and that God knows all things, then "knows all things" does not seem to mean what classical omniscience insists it must. To claim that it means something different in one case because it is being applied to God in that case, is special pleading."Special pleading" is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes an exception to a rule or argument without justifying why that exception is necessary.
FYI, I provided the word of GOD your issue is with that
Essentially, it's when someone argues that a case should be treated differently without offering valid reasons for why it should be, often to defend a position that’s hard to justify.
You may disagree, but one was provided, and Scripture was given. You have not provided any scripture to refute my understanding; therefore, your argument is weak.
For example, if someone says, "I know the rule is that no one can be late, but I should be allowed to be late because I had a bad day," they’re committing special pleading
sounds like your argument
You are trying to make an exception for yourself without offering a logical reason why Open Theism should be treated differently from what the text provides in Jonah
In short, you are applying double standards without proper justification.
Non-sequitur.What? God has off days? You people are too much.
But we are talking about GOD, not someone who holds to open theism. In the Divine Nature of God, he is omniscience
the context to this Attribute is Omni" means "all" and "science" refers to knowledge, so "omniscience" literally translates to "all-knowing."
Fully and completely without Limitations. Human rationality cannot demolish GOD nature.
LOLGod sent Jonah to Nineveh to preach destruction. Repentance was not part of the message.
“Yet forty days and Nineveh shall be destroyed.”
The people of Nineveh believed God, fasted and repented of their evil.
“9 Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not?”
When the people repented, God repented.
“10 And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.”
Repentance was always an option. Don't take my word for it. Take Jonah's word for it. He knew it, and that is why he initially fled from God's call.God sent Jonah to Nineveh to preach destruction. Repentance was not part of the message.
“Yet forty days and Nineveh shall be destroyed.”