Not sure what you are talking about but that sounds horrifying.There's a medical procedure that doesnt require it.
Not sure what you are talking about but that sounds horrifying.There's a medical procedure that doesnt require it.
Non sequitur. Where is the logical connection to what we were talking about.
it is common sense there are medical reason why one would have to provide a sample in that manner. It seems strange one would even have to explain again the context of medical reasons such has heathy seed to impregnate a women or one's wife. How is that sin? where as addiction to porn and the action of that is clearly not the same would you not agree?
If you have to ask why having sexual intercourse with the nurse to get one sample you have displayed clear perversion in your thinking. I have never heard of such twisted reasoning to defend a sexual perversion before it also most laughable if it were not so stupid.
I don't need to back up what is clearly an empty thought and anecdotical response . You need to back up your position with scripture.
Where is your mind in these actions?Excuse the crude nature of this post, I just have really been struggling with this lately. Is it a sin? Where is the line drawn?
The law of Moses says not to uncover your sister's nakedness. The Bible isn't perverted for suggesting such an idea. And I didn't have any particular nurse in mind.
The act of having sex with the nurse is a sinful act. if some bad guys say they will shoot you if you don't have sex with the nurse, it's still a sin to do so. If that were the only way available to collect a sample for the doctor, it's a sin. But you allow for masturbation to collect a sperm sample, so you aren't treating sex with a woman like masturbation. One, you have as a sin in all cases. I'm assuming sex with the nurse is always wrong in your mind (unless she's the wife of the man in question.)
You can insult me, but that doesn't strengthen your argument.
- The act of having sex with a nurse in the context you laid out in your post if married that would be adultery, if not that would be fornication. In context to a medical specimen to determine one's sperm Count has never required one to have sex with the nurse to find out if one has a good count or not. FYI it has never been required to have sex with a nurse to achieve lab work. Your point is ridicules.
And by your own example being forced to have sex is known as rape which is a violation of the law of the land which we are to obey unless it goes against Gods laws.
I haven't surveyed to find out, and I don't know how one would measure that. I do know that porn use is widespread, but that has not always been the case.I am not treating sex in anyway. I am saying that most men who are engaged in this self-gratification are addicted to sexual perversion.
Matthew 5:37I am also not saying that 'masturbation is somehow good.'
Matthew 5:37
New American Standard Bible
But make sure your statement is, ‘Yes, yes’ or ‘No, no’; anything beyond these is of evil origin.
So far you have been somewhere in the middle.
Ezekiel 16:17
New American Standard Bible
You also took your beautiful jewels made of My gold and of My silver, which I had given you, and made for yourself male images so that you might commit prostitution with them.
God says His bride has made a male dildo & committed adultery with it.
Why would God say that as a major sin and use masterbation as an example of such sin?
Gee, I thought I just did!You would have to prove this to me.
Let me say this. Anyone who find "Antoni van Leeuwenhoek important in the history " because he abused his wife and documented that abused and called it Science, is a great example of what Germany called science when they murdered and abused 6 million Jews.Antoni van Leeuwenhoek important in the history of the microscope, is said to have retrieved a sperm sample after intercourse with his wife. I wonder if he had masturbated and written that he had done so if this would have been seen as incredibly scandalous. So I had in mind the early history, perhaps earliest history, of retrieving such samples in mind.
My point is, if masturbation is a sin, then it's wrong to do it, like a nurse doing so would be in such a situation, if one were not married to the nurse.
Not sure how that topic came up.
I haven't surveyed to find out, and I don't know how one would measure that. I do know that porn use is widespread, but that has not always been the case.
5not in lustful passion, like the Gentiles who do not know God;
Let me say this. Anyone who find "Antoni van Leeuwenhoek important in the history " because he abused his wife and documented that abused and called it Science, is a great example of what Germany called science when they murdered and abused 6 million Jews.
And if you have to "wonder if he had masturbated and written that he had done so" then you say "if Masturbation sin" is greatly revealing of you mind-set. Who would want to know such perverted things? And used it to formulate and argument for Masturbation.
Let me say this. Anyone who find "Antoni van Leeuwenhoek important in the history " because he abused his wife and documented that abused and called it Science, is a great example of what Germany called science when they murdered and abused 6 million Jews.
[/quote]And if you have to "wonder if he had masturbated and written that he had done so" then you say "if Masturbation sin" is greatly revealing of you mind-set. Who would want to know such perverted things? And used it to formulate and argument for Masturbation.
How so?Gee, I thought I just did!
Calling other people's posts 'diatribes' is not a formula for respectful conversation.
I am also not saying that 'masturbation is somehow good.' I am saying if you are going to accuse people of sin, you need to have some actual scripture to back it up. The case against masturbation is as loose as the case against birth control, and maybe even weaker.
Now, within your world view, should you consider that you wrote that about me because of a 'lying spirit' or a 'spirit of inaccuracy.' Would have to consider that you need to have a demon cast out of you?
Do you think all sins are caused by specific demons named after that sin?
I've never heard that one. He had a good teaching on fasting. Someone on a forum asked who readers would prefer as a teacher, Kenneth Hagin or Derek Prince. I thought Derek Prince, except I was wary of his emphasis on demons and the way he viewed it. Someone said Hagin liked Derek Prince, but was wary of his teachings on demons.
I'm not going to base doctrine on Prince's experience. I know there are a lot of Charismatics and people in the signs and wonders movement who make light use of scripture and a lot of their rapidly evolving doctrine is based on what preacher's say and other people's experiences.
I have a question for you? When you accuse someone of having a spirit or a demon do you feel like you have to have some sort of revelation from the Holy Spirit to say that, or is it just derived from a world view you've picked up from others?
Is it like this for you? Do you think like this?
"You watch porn, so I cast out that lust demon."
"You have pain, so I cast out that pain demon."
"You have arthritis so I cast out that arthritis demon."
"You lost a foot, so I cast out that spirit of one-footed-ness."
"Your food is not salty so I cast out the spirit of unsaltiness out of your food."
I'm not going to accuse you of needing to have a 'spirit of slander' or a 'spirit of accusation' in you. I believe you need to take responsibility for your own actions, and if I don't actually perceive a spirit myself, I have no right to make the accusation. (And a childish assumption that if someone has a problem they must have a demon named after that problem doesn't count.)
I would remind you of James 4:11
Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge
I would also point you to the numerous scriptures that address sin as people's responsibility. You can go through Paul's letters and see that Paul exhorts people to steal no more and to work with their own hands... with no recommendation to cast out demons of theft or laziness out of them. He doesn't say to cast the demon of fornication out of people in I Corinthians 5 and 6. He doesn't tell them to cast out the spirit of division in I Corinthians 2 by yelling at it, or tell them to cast out a spirit of disorderly use of gifts in chapter 14, or a demon of denying the resurrection of the dead in chapter 15. Jesus said to his audience, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. He didn't say He needed to cast out their spirit of unrepentance, and we never see Him rebuking the spirit of unbelief in the Bible.
Btw, I also didn't say I didn't want you talking about demonology. Be careful not to misrepresent others? But again, I take that as _____your____ choice, and ____your_____ responsibility. If a demon is involved, I haven't perceived that, so I choose not to misrepresent you. Rather, I think it is good if you rethink this issue, actually study what the Bible teaches on it instead of repeating stuff from preachers or books you've read, and pray about it.
I just choose not to comment on whether I ever masturbated. When I see people posting stuff that implies that someone who masturbates ___has to be looking at porn__ or has to be thinking lustful thoughts, I'm thinking there is a really big chance that they are reading their own personal experience into the situation.
If I don't have scripture to back it up, I'm not willing to heap condemnation upon teens. I'm willing to teach on and promote waiting until marriage, not looking with lust, etc. That can be taught out of the Bible without getting 'too creative.' Then there is medical stuff like collecting samples for fertility (never had an issue with that personally, praise God) or masturbation incorporated into a marital sexual experience. One of the posters here allowed for that... but we wouldn't allow sex with a non-spouse for the same reasons.
You aren't making much sense here? Are you wanting to say, 'Thus saith the Lord' a prophecy that God has now revealed that masturbation is evil, but that the Bible does not teach that it is evil? Are you implying that the Bible doesn't teach that there is a rapture? There is I Thessalonians 4. It happens at the parousia according to that passage. Are you trying to imply that the Bible doesn't address homosexual activity? Look at Leviticus 18, 19, Romans 1, I Timothy 1, and I Corinthians 6.
'Rapture' is not in the Vulgate, but a related Latin word is. But what is your point? How does this relate to the topic. We aren't talking about just a word showing up in a translation, but a scripture addressing the topic.
Men dressing as women and women as men is addressed. So is homosexual activity.
The passage in II Corinthians is about the letter v. the Spirit, not 'the Spirit of the word.' The 'spirit of the law' is an idea from Augustine, maybe Ambrose and California law, not what Paul was talking about.
IMO, a rather poor interpretation of the passage. Did you read the whole chapter and try to get the gist of what Paul is saying?
We are done. I cannot help you.How so?
I know zakar can mean male part in Indonesian, and read that it __can__ mean that in Arabic, though I think it means 'male' normally. I don't know that it means that in Hebrew. Did you read that idea in a commentary?
The donkey/horse verse is in Ezekiel also. Maybe that's why some of the Jews required men be 40 to read it?
Is it like this for you? Do you think like this?
"You watch porn, so I cast out that lust demon."
"You have pain, so I cast out that pain demon."
"You have arthritis so I cast out that arthritis demon."
"You lost a foot, so I cast out that spirit of one-footed-ness."
"Your food is not salty so I cast out the spirit of unsaltiness out of your food."
I am also not saying that 'masturbation is somehow good.' I am saying if you are going to accuse people of sin, you need to have some actual scripture to back it up. The case against masturbation is as loose as the case against birth control, and maybe even weaker.
I do have a problem with fuzzy youth of scripture.
amen2 Timothy 3:1-5
1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
![]()