I guess you got triggered judging from you repeated posts and diatribes about masturbation is somehow good.
Calling other people's posts 'diatribes' is not a formula for respectful conversation.
I am also not saying that 'masturbation is somehow good.' I am saying if you are going to accuse people of sin, you need to have some actual scripture to back it up. The case against masturbation is as loose as the case against birth control, and maybe even weaker.
Now, within your world view, should you consider that you wrote that about me because of a 'lying spirit' or a 'spirit of inaccuracy.' Would have to consider that you need to have a demon cast out of you?
Do you think all sins are caused by specific demons named after that sin?
Let me get this straight, you like Derek Prince. So you've heard many of his videos and teachings. Did you like any of the testimonies about when he cast the spirit of masturbation out of different people and how that spirit always leaves through their fingers?
I've never heard that one. He had a good teaching on fasting. Someone on a forum asked who readers would prefer as a teacher, Kenneth Hagin or Derek Prince. I thought Derek Prince, except I was wary of his emphasis on demons and the way he viewed it. Someone said Hagin liked Derek Prince, but was wary of his teachings on demons.
I'm not going to base doctrine on Prince's experience. I know there are a lot of Charismatics and people in the signs and wonders movement who make light use of scripture and a lot of their rapidly evolving doctrine is based on what preacher's say and other people's experiences.
I have a question for you? When you accuse someone of having a spirit or a demon do you feel like you have to have some sort of revelation from the Holy Spirit to say that, or is it just derived from a world view you've picked up from others?
Is it like this for you? Do you think like this?
"You watch porn, so I cast out that lust demon."
"You have pain, so I cast out that pain demon."
"You have arthritis so I cast out that arthritis demon."
"You lost a foot, so I cast out that spirit of one-footed-ness."
"Your food is not salty so I cast out the spirit of unsaltiness out of your food."
How come you don't want me talking about demonology? Is that you talking, or...someone else?
I'm not going to accuse you of needing to have a 'spirit of slander' or a 'spirit of accusation' in you. I believe you need to take responsibility for your own actions, and if I don't actually perceive a spirit myself, I have no right to make the accusation. (And a childish assumption that if someone has a problem they must have a demon named after that problem doesn't count.)
I would remind you of James 4:11
Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of
his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge
I would also point you to the numerous scriptures that address sin as people's responsibility. You can go through Paul's letters and see that Paul exhorts people to steal no more and to work with their own hands... with no recommendation to cast out demons of theft or laziness out of them. He doesn't say to cast the demon of fornication out of people in I Corinthians 5 and 6. He doesn't tell them to cast out the spirit of division in I Corinthians 2 by yelling at it, or tell them to cast out a spirit of disorderly use of gifts in chapter 14, or a demon of denying the resurrection of the dead in chapter 15. Jesus said to his audience, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. He didn't say He needed to cast out their spirit of unrepentance, and we never see Him rebuking the spirit of unbelief in the Bible.
Btw, I also didn't say I didn't want you talking about demonology. Be careful not to misrepresent others? But again, I take that as _____your____ choice, and ____your_____ responsibility. If a demon is involved, I haven't perceived that, so I choose not to misrepresent you. Rather, I think it is good if you rethink this issue, actually study what the Bible teaches on it instead of repeating stuff from preachers or books you've read, and pray about it.
I didn't condemn anyone but somebody who writes as much as you do about masturbation and how it is ok...can't admit that they themselves do the practice? I don't believe that someone can write that much about something without knowing a very lot about it! There is another guy here that has chided me for speaking about demons, we don't need that! he said...
I just choose not to comment on whether I ever masturbated. When I see people posting stuff that implies that someone who masturbates ___has to be looking at porn__ or has to be thinking lustful thoughts, I'm thinking there is a really big chance that they are reading their own personal experience into the situation.
If I don't have scripture to back it up, I'm not willing to heap condemnation upon teens. I'm willing to teach on and promote waiting until marriage, not looking with lust, etc. That can be taught out of the Bible without getting 'too creative.' Then there is medical stuff like collecting samples for fertility (never had an issue with that personally, praise God) or masturbation incorporated into a marital sexual experience. One of the posters here allowed for that... but we wouldn't allow sex with a non-spouse for the same reasons.
And what's this stuff from you about, if it isn't in the bible specifically, then it has to be ok? Would you dare to try to hold God to the Word inasmuch as He can't say it is an evil practice now? That's absurd. Anti=rapture people say that, and so do homosexuals.
You aren't making much sense here? Are you wanting to say, 'Thus saith the Lord' a prophecy that God has now revealed that masturbation is evil, but that the Bible does not teach that it is evil? Are you implying that the Bible doesn't teach that there is a rapture? There is I Thessalonians 4. It happens at the parousia according to that passage. Are you trying to imply that the Bible doesn't address homosexual activity? Look at Leviticus 18, 19, Romans 1, I Timothy 1, and I Corinthians 6.
They're called "Translations" and it depends on what translation you are reading to if a certain word is in there. The word Rapture isn't in my Translation, but it is in the Latin Vulgate! So maybe you just need to read a more modern translation to get the words you (do not) seek.
'Rapture' is not in the Vulgate, but a related Latin word is. But what is your point? How does this relate to the topic. We aren't talking about just a word showing up in a translation, but a scripture addressing the topic.
Transgender isn't in scripture, that must be good too?
Men dressing as women and women as men is addressed. So is homosexual activity.
Your problem is the letter of the word and not the Spirit of the word.
The passage in II Corinthians is about the letter v. the Spirit, not 'the Spirit of the word.' The 'spirit of the law' is an idea from Augustine, maybe Ambrose and California law, not what Paul was talking about.
2nd Corinthians 3:6
6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life..../KJV
And that's what you are doing. "It doesn't say it in scripture exactly that way, so it is ok to go masturbate"? Uhh, good luck with that.
IMO, a rather poor interpretation of the passage. Did you read the whole chapter and try to get the gist of what Paul is saying?