Is marriage really a "foretaste of heaven"?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I've been kicking around the planet for some time now and have never heard that 'doctrine'. I kind of think you are just wanting to have a discussion about it because saying it is taught in nearly all churches is, to put it simply, bogus. Seems to be a Catholic teaching actually and most people here are not Cahtolic. So why don't you just be up front and say it's a Catholic teaching rather than the 'taught in all churches'?


That's cause it seems to be a Catholic teaching. Motives of the op do not seem to be crystal clear :unsure::whistle:

Not Catholic here and in my 2 different homechurches and our non-denominational "church" church i have heard several times over the last 20 years that marriage is a picture of the Church being the Bride and Jesus the Groom.
 
I heard a comedian talking about how the part about being fruitful and multiplying was also a curse. "Those of you who have children, you understand this. God was not happy when he said it. God was ANGRY at them when he told them to be fruitful and multiply. That was a curse!"

Then God BLESSED them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
Genesis 1:28

Doesn't sound like God was unhappy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Not Catholic here and in my 2 different homechurches and our non-denominational "church" church i have heard several times over the last 20 years that marriage is a picture of the Church being the Bride and Jesus the Groom.

Yes and so has every one else but the op disagrees with that and is specific on a Catholic teaching. Perhaps consider the op's remarks again. Christians know or should know, what is in scripture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suze
Then God BLESSED them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
Genesis 1:28

Doesn't sound like God was unhappy.
As I said, it was a comedian who said that.
 
Then God BLESSED them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
Genesis 1:28

Doesn't sound like God was unhappy.
The real fulfillment of this is the Great Commission.

All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age. (Matt. 28:18-20)
 
Marriage as a "foretaste of heaven", an earthly reflection of our relationship with Jesus, is a common doctrine taught in all nearly all churches, but upon close examination, it doesn't seem to hold water:

1. The "match in heaven" in Revelation 21 is the union of Christ and his people, which marks the completion of salvation. The bride is the Great Multitude, the whole church of Christ in a collective sense, not any individual in particular;
2. As a historical fact, Lord Jesus himself was never married, he didn't even have any intimate relationship with any woman during his ministry; so was Paul, Timothy, numerous OT prophets like Isaiah, and generations of most devoted church fathers and mothers, abbesses, priests and missionaries, serving in the ministry is marriage with the Lord;
3. Paul taught in 1 Cor. 7 that we should be eschatalogically minded on the things of God (1 Cor. 7:29-31), marriage is merely a concession (1 Cor. 7:6), it's a burden (1 Cor. 7:28) and a distraction (1 Cor. 7:35); Jesus taught that celibacy is a gift, especially for those who choose celibacy for kingdom's sake (Matt. 19:12)
4. Ironically, it was the Sedduccees who couldn't comprehend resurrection, they tried to ridicule Jesus with their absurd hypothesis based on their projection of marriage into the afterlife; Jesus schooled them with a real preview of heaven: "For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven." (Matt. 22:30). Therefore, shouldn't a real foretaste of heaven be singlehood, i.e. "neither marry nor are given in marriage"?
5. During the early church period, marriage was merely a cultural norm, the early hermits and monks were all single like Paul, they abstained from marriage as a part of their ascetic pratice to evade worldly corruption. Even for some who did marry for economic and social reason, they remained celibate during their marriage, chastity was equated with spiritual purity. Only did marriage offically become a sacrament in late 12th century and early 13th century, then it was a major political move to forge unions and acquire properties, a climb on the social ladder into a higher class.

Another enormous game-changer is the prosperity after WWII, marriage rate once reached an abnormal peak of over 90% of the adult population, that's when the prosperity gospel began to take flight, marriage a pillar of this properity. Afterward was the hippie movement and sexual revolution, "purity culture" began to emerge as a countermeasure to that, marriage a license to sex; fast forward to today's hyper polarized political climate, marriage is further elevated by the conservatives as the saving grace to boost the declining birth rate, make America great again and save the decaying western civilization. It has gone so far that it has become an indicator of your political leaning, if you're married, you're suspected to be a right wing supporter.

So, as you can see, the meaning of marriage evolves over time. By God's original design, it a turning point in your life journey, THE sign of your independence, as you leave your parents and start your own. However, in reality, the meaning of marriage slowly evolves, from a cultural norm to a socio-economic union, a holy sacrament, a means for upward mobility, a romanticized "happily ever after", a status symbol of persperity, a countermeasure against the sexual revolution, an indicator of ringwing political leaning. Even within the bible itself, marriage evoled from polygamy to bigamy to monogamy and "serial monogamy", as was the common practice of the Pharisees during Jesus's ministry. When Jesus confronted the Pharisees on that in Matt. 19, he schooled them with the original design of marriage, but he had no intention of restoring it to its original design, nor did he order it on his followers. Therefore, the doctrine of marriage as a "foretaste of heaven" was not gleaned from the Scripture, but political and cultural context.

For purpose of clarification, I'm only against the idolatry and the romanticization of marriage, not marriage itself. Most assuredly, marriage is a turning point in your life journey, a rite of passage that truly changes you, but for better or worse depends on whom you're married to, and whether you're joined by God or by your own desire. Not every one can find a comparable partner to marry, and not every one is capable of all the responsibilities in marriage. Paul taught that husband and wife ought to be "equally yoked" in spirit, a godly partner is a blessing, an ungodly partner would be a curse, and a godly man like Charlie Kirk or a godly woman like the one in Prov. 31 is extremely rare.

Yes, I met an angel in my dreams and marriage is the closest thing on earth to heaven. It's symbolic in every way. A spouse knows almost everything about you just as God.

Likewise no one loves you like spouse in a healthy relationship similar to God. Although God loves deeper than any human is even capable. So do angels. And you will love God more than anyone even if you sometimes don't feel it on earth. We reflect back God's love on us.
 
Yes, I met an angel in my dreams and marriage is the closest thing on earth to heaven. It's symbolic in every way. A spouse knows almost everything about you just as God.

Likewise no one loves you like spouse in a healthy relationship similar to God. Although God loves deeper than any human is even capable. So do angels. And you will love God more than anyone even if you sometimes don't feel it on earth. We reflect back God's love on us.
I'm afraid whoever clings onto this sales pitch of marriage is in the leagues of the Sadduccess, to whom marriage in heaven no different from marriage on earth, and they attempted to ridicul Jesus from this angle. Jesus schooled them with the real insight of the afterlife, where there will be neither marriage or giving in to marriage. It is explicitly implicated that angels in heaven don't marry, yet somehow according to you, marriage is the "closest thing on earth to heaven".
 
I'm afraid whoever clings onto this sales pitch of marriage is in the leagues of the Sadduccess, to whom marriage in heaven no different from marriage on earth, and they attempted to ridicul Jesus from this angle. Jesus schooled them with the real insight of the afterlife, where there will be neither marriage or giving in to marriage. It is explicitly implicated that angels in heaven don't marry, yet somehow according to you, marriage is the "closest thing on earth to heaven".
So very, very many things wrong with such a short post...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snackersmom
So very, very many things wrong with such a short post...

Then may I humbly present you this speech at a wedding ceremony that perfectly lays out the nature and purposes of marriage.

Dearly beloved, we are gathered here
in the sight of God, and in the face of this congregation,
to join together this man
and this woman in holy matrimony,
which is an honourable estate,
instituted by God in the time of man's innocency,
signifying unto us the mystical union
that is between Christ and His church,
and therefore is not by any
to be enterprised lightly, or wantonly, to satisfy man's
carnal lusts and appetites,
but reverently, discreetly,
advisedly, soberly, and in the fear of God,
duly considering the causes for which matrimony was ordained.

First, it was ordained for the procreation of children.

Secondly, as a remedy against sin, and to avoid fornication.

Thirdly, for the mutual society, help and comfort that the one ought to have of the other, both in prosperity and adversity,

into which holy estate these persons
present come now to be joined.
 
There is no biological reproduction in Heaven, but that doesnt mean it isnt physical. We should have like what Jesus had in His resurrection body. He told them, I am no ghost touch me and see. So He was solid flesh and bone. And He could walk through walls and stuff too. God is He who creates in Heaven.


why would you limit Christ to flesh and bone?

he had to appear as He was as a human to authenticate the Resurrection.
and He can appear in what ever form, when He met the two walking they did not recognize Him,

If He was invisible, no proof.

we are born of water, humans are 60 to 75% water and then to Spirit, invisible to humans, like the wind, you can't see the wind

I would never limit God
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
There is no biological reproduction in Heaven, but that doesnt mean it isnt physical. We should have like what Jesus had in His resurrection body. He told them, I am no ghost touch me and see. So He was solid flesh and bone. And He could walk through walls and stuff too. God is He who creates in Heaven.


I missed that one ""that doesnt mean it isnt physical."' Sorry the third heaven and all there spirit there is no physical. and sorry you will not be living in physical homes in the third heaven. actually not sorry, living in a physical house is very limiting and a bother, and costly

The First resurrection is to Spirit - eternal -- no breathing, no water, no food, no sleep, travel at the speed of thought and our thought will be a trillion time faster then as humans

Why limit God?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Marriage is like a relationship with God that it is 2 beings dedicated to each other that includes no one else but those 2 beings in that situation.

But marriage is physical and with God it is spiritual.

A man and woman married become one flesh and God and a saint become one.

There is no relationship closer physically than marriage and no relationship closer spiritually than being with God.

Which are based on love, commitment, and dedication.

Nothing wavering at least it should not be.

But in America a whole lot of wavering be going on.

Mat 24:12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.

Since America is highly selfish, arrogant, lovers of money, and basically care about self, and a general distrust of others because of this behavior it will be dragged in to marriage.

But people like that breed people like that and it gets worse as time goes on.

Why do you think the Woke movement came about.

Why do you think the so called "Karens" lash out.

It is because of the behavior of America.

Some people point at people and say I act like this because they do so I am countering them.

But they didn't start the fire.

They are saying the same thing about other people.

So the people that point their finger at them become like them.

But think they are justified like the people they point at doing the same thing.

Marriage has complications today that did not happen or to a lesser degree years ago.

1. Technology causing money and material things to flow like a raging river causing a problem there.

There is more to pursue and lust over on a personal level that can cause a problem.

2. Increased immorality and selfishness so there will be a problem there.

3. Basically knew what you were getting years ago because of the low dose of immorality and selfishness in a society that could not pursue what they can now.

Which now marriage is a gamble.

4. More faults.

Which a big thing is people do not tell you their faults when they first get together because everyone is on their best behavior for if not they would not get together.

The faults do not come out until later which they come bursting forth like water from a weakened dam for they cannot hold it back because it is their personality.

Then you think why didn't you give me a heads up that you would hog up the finances, prone to cheat, and prone to hit, for if I would have known I would of not of married you.

If people gave a heads up the marriage population would be down.

5. Most relationships, marriage, are based on finances, and love is second place.

They like that both work so the bills are split leaving them money for themselves to enjoy.

Plus a lot of men do not want to support women that much anymore.

For them crying equal rights(which they should have), being in to money as a priority, and dogging out men in society and the internet.

6. People do not trust, do not love, and are selfish more, so people do not get close like they used to and try to manipulate in the relationship.

It is like a business deal between 2 companies and they both work to tip the deal in their favor.

It is like the stock market where they will invest but expect a bigger return leaving the other person with the short end of the stick.

So there is a lot of factors that pose marriage is not like as it was years ago, and more complicated than years ago.

This is not Little House on the Prairie anymore.
 
Why limit God?
Because God must die for the sin of mankind in human form, therefore He limited himself in human form. Also, his authority springs from his capacity as Moses's successor, therefore he must come into being in human form, i.e. "from their brethren".

I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him. (Deut. 18:18)
 
Because God must die for the sin of mankind in human form, therefore He limited himself in human form. Also, his authority springs from his capacity as Moses's successor, therefore he must come into being in human form, i.e. "from their brethren".

I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him. (Deut. 18:18)

comment:

so!!! Jesus Christ, GOD, that made everything that was made, gave up Eternal life, came to die for man, coming in human flesh so He could die,

now stands next the the Father's Throne in heaven ---- in human flesh??? not restored to what He was before??

My guess would be that out of the 45,000 flavors of what is "generously" called christian --- what you believe may be accepted by a few flavors -- but you are correct -- right? and you can quote the verse stating Christ will forever be flesh and bone, no longer spirit?

not being part of one of the 45,000 flavors of confusion -- I have never been exposed to that depth of confusion --
 
comment:

so!!! Jesus Christ, GOD, that made everything that was made, gave up Eternal life, came to die for man, coming in human flesh so He could die,

now stands next the the Father's Throne in heaven ---- in human flesh??? not restored to what He was before??

My guess would be that out of the 45,000 flavors of what is "generously" called christian --- what you believe may be accepted by a few flavors -- but you are correct -- right? and you can quote the verse stating Christ will forever be flesh and bone, no longer spirit?

not being part of one of the 45,000 flavors of confusion -- I have never been exposed to that depth of confusion --

Any flavor of confusion is yours alone. Since Jesus is in heaven, according to 1 Cor. 15:40, he is in a celestial body fit for heaven. However, I was talking about his ministry on earth. When he returns to earth, he'll reappear in his human form, a terrestrial body fit for earth.

There are also celestial bodies and terrestrial bodies; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another. (1 Cor. 15:40)
 
Any flavor of confusion is yours alone. Since Jesus is in heaven, according to 1 Cor. 15:40, he is in a celestial body fit for heaven. However, I was talking about his ministry on earth. When he returns to earth, he'll reappear in his human form, a terrestrial body fit for earth.

There are also celestial bodies and terrestrial bodies; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another. (1 Cor. 15:40)

You did not make that clear,, yes, Christ can and has appeared in many bodies. He appeared to Abraham and ate with him, He appeared to Jacob and wrestled with him and after the resurrection He met two walking and they did not recognize Him.