My list of Unnecessary water?:my list of reasons that baptism is "necessary".
You can say nope all you want, or nope backwards, epon, or change the letters even, open, peno, pone, or whatever, but you can't change what the scriptures clearly say. Nope; that ain't gonna happen.
God is not bound by hypotheticals. He is bound by His own word. All will be judged by it according to Jesus in John 12:48. The scriptures below reference this truth..
• Eph 4:5 . . There is one faith, one baptism
Let's say, hypothetically; that a number of coal miners were trapped hundreds
of feet below ground by an impassible cave-in and they all died before help
arrived.
Let's say one of those miners was a Christian guy who hurriedly explained the
gospel to all involved.
Well; like it's said: there are no atheists in a fox hole. They all to a man
were overjoyed by the Christian's gospel-- the virgin birth, the crucifixion,
and the resurrection, i.e. the whole ball of wax --until he got to this point:
• Mark 16:16 . .Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever
does not believe will be condemned.
Well; there was no water down there for the men to be baptized.
_
See post 1164.Same with death bed confessions. Foxholes in war. Believers in hostile nations. And many many other scenarios.
Acts 2:40-42Why do so many think God needs our help to Save us.
The bible does however and it also makes you incorrect.repetition does not make you correct
An interesting thought came to mind earlier today that expresses the possibility that those who water baptize may be required to have the Holy Ghost dwelling within. Why? Because it was at Pentecost that both the Holy Ghost was given and repentance, and water baptism in the name of Jesus was preached and begun. Jesus' words in Luke 24:47 point to this truth..
I appreciate your curiosity because it provokes me question who today
qualifies as a baptizer? And how do people today become qualified to
baptize? Do they have to be ordained and/or licensed? Or maybe there's
a board exam; like for lawyers?
_
Don't forget....baptism is a ritual symbolizing DEATH.See post 1164.
Yes. John's baptism was the precursor to the baptism noted in Acts 2:38. It was identical except that in Acts 2:38, the baptism is in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins. Unlike John's baptism, which would require continuous repeating upon sinning, baptism into Christ is a one time event with only repentance necessary afterwards in the event of sin. Note the Ephesians were re-baptized into Christ as recorded in Acts 19 since they had only been baptized unto John's baptism. Note too, they were baptized correctly and received the gift of the Holy Ghost, the Holy Spirit itself, as per Acts 2:38 as does everyone, but it wasn't until after Paul laid his hands on them that they received the miraculous manifestation of the various gifts as noted, i,e.; they spoke in tongues. This demonstrates that receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost, the Holy Ghost or Spirit itself, is different than receiving the miraculous gifts of the Spirit as listed in 1 Cor 12:8-10, that are enabled by or through the Spirit and are so manifested by the laying on of the apostles hands.An interesting thought came to mind earlier today that expresses the possibility that those who water baptize may be required to have the Holy Ghost dwelling within. Why? Because it was at Pentecost that both the Holy Ghost was given and repentance, and water baptism in the name of Jesus was preached and begun. Jesus' words in Luke 24:47 point to this truth.
Also, John the Baptist had the Holy Ghost dwelling in him from his mother's womb. However, when John began baptism for repentance no one knew who the messiah was. They just knew He would soon arrive on the scene. Even after Jesus was identified, no one knew He would die and resurrect. John's baptism was later modified to include the use of the name of the Lord Jesus in connection with His death, burial and resurrection. As such the believer is positioned with Jesus in His sacrifice. (Rom. 6:3-6)
Lastly, consider after telling the disciples to receive the Holy Ghost, Jesus says whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained." (John 20:23) Since it is obvious that they could not remit sins in and of themselves, Jesus' words would seem to relate to the disciples preaching the gospel and administering water baptism. (Acts 2:38, 22:16)
Grace is seen in God's willingness to make a way for people to be saved. He did not devise it because man's good behavior warranted it. But just the opposite; He did it in spite of man's sinful nature. He established it out of His loveThat chapter does not tell us that. Ever.
Paul did not contradict himself.
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.
Ephesians 2
That chapter does not tell us that. Ever.
Paul did not contradict himself.
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.
Ephesians 2
Grace is seen in God's willingness to make a way for people to be saved. He did not devise it because man's good behavior warranted it. But just the opposite; He did it in spite of man's sinful nature. He established it out of His love
The bible does however and it also makes you incorrect.
Yes. I am right because my position is no different than the scriptures. Goodbyethat is quite a defense of your opinion
I am wrong, you say, so that means you are right
sounds like something a spoiled 4 year old would say just before being told to go their room
nope. LOL!
Do you find any such expression of this concerning baptism?Have you ever considered the consequence for those who would neglect to obey God's command of circumcision? Circumcision was required for those in the OT in order to remain in covenant with God. I've provided confirming scriptures below. Consider the significance as it relates to the NT command of water baptism.
"And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant." Gen 17:14
"And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the Lord met him, and sought to kill him. (Moses)
Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me.
So he let him go: then she said, A bloody husband thou art, because of the circumcision." Ex 4:24-26
The only examples we have are in the scriptures, and therein you find that subsequent to Jesus's death, all were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. We're baptized into HIS body, and become part of HIS body which is HIS church.Is baptism in the name of Jesus only, modalism/oneness theology?
If so why and how does it stand in contrast with the theology of the trinity?
According to the word, the fulness of the Godhead dwells in Jesus. That is why Peter commanded everyone to be baptized that way. Also, the apostles consistently water baptized people in the name of Jesus. The following scriptures reveal this truth. (Acts 2:36-42, 8:12-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-7, 22:16)Is baptism in the name of Jesus only, modalism/oneness theology?
If so why and how does it stand in contrast with the theology of the trinity?