How do you, who oppose healing as a promise, reconcile your belief system that healing is not guaranteed with people in the Bible having faith to be healed? You're telling me that I can't have faith to be healed because it isn't a promise, but this is contradictory to scripture where people had faith to be healed (and were healed).
You have an apparent contradiction that, when considered, defeats your argument because it goes contrary to God's word.
If we cannot expect to be healed (because, according to you, we have no promises, guarantee, His word, etc) then how is it even possible to follow a biblical precedent of having faith in order to be healed?