lol the author of that is a Christian Science practitioner
She's heavily into gnostic writings like the Apocryphon of John. No wonder she hates and lies about Irenaeus
lol the author of that is a Christian Science practitioner
She doesn't hate Iraneus. And she doesn't lie.She's heavily into gnostic writings like the Apocryphon of John. No wonder she hates and lies about Irenaeus
She doesn't hate Iraneus. And she doesn't lie.
I understand you don't realize what she wrote. She cross compared Iraneus claims regarding the Gnostics and showed where the Gnostics never taught nor believed as Iraneus claimed.
Extraordinary that you put so much confidence in this person who promotes gnostic writings
The 'you are preaching a license to sin' line, ignores the presence of the Holy Spirit in a believers spirit.
With that presence, if a believer gets into sin.. they WILL experience conviction and rebuke from Him.
They may also, if they are part of a church, experience discipline from that church.
God may also take their life..bring them home..to discontinue their sinful ways.
Just because the consequence of hell isnt for the believer, doesnt mean there are NO consequences.
Gal_2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.That did not and does not apply to us today. James wrote that to Israel. See James 1:1. That was not written to the body of Christ.
In a manner of speaking, but some claim that those who allegedly were ever truly saved and live like the devil thereafter...lose their salvation. That clearly does not happen, and I have challenged them to show me one person they can say ever did that very thing, and I have yet to hear from any of them that they knew anyone who had.
That would be cause to question as to if they EVER truly believed in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ. For anyone to say that anyone can lose their salvation, that clearly is a belief in works-based salvation.
MM
I also don't support Iraneus Recapitulation theory of Christ. I.E. He was truly possessed of a human nature.
I'm not Roman Catholic. I don't venerate those who slur other faiths in order to proclaim Christ approves lies as a proper tactic to prove His Light of Truth is Holy.
You can not seperate good works from the Spirit of God.
The title says it must be one or the other. This is false. Faith is never of any use without works to prove it.
That is what fruit is all about. Fruitless people, having dead faith will not make it into Heaven.
I think what first needs to be established is what is ment by "grace" we enter in. What is this grace?
Abraham spoke of it.
God himself shall supply the sacrifice.
Grace is unmerited favor given.
Abraham believed God...obeyed the command...built a alter. Offered what God had asked for.
ALL EPISTLES are written to christians, not sinners.That does indeed fit in with the message James wrote to the twelve tribes of Israel. He did not write that to the body of Christ, for it was not intended for us who are under the Gospel of Grace.
Venerate whom you prefer.Since you are slandering Irenaeus as a liar, consider his staunch opposition to gnostic heresies as slurring other faiths and imply he was a Roman Catholic, which he wasn't in the sense you're trying to imply, I'll mention that Irenaeus was a student of Polycarp, who was a student of John the apostle. So in the chain of doctrinal transmission he was John the apostle's grandson, and was thus very close to the what the apostles taught.
You'll have to ask Iraneus that since he is the one that taught this.Would you please explain what you mean by saying Christ wasn't "truly possessed of a human nature"?
Venerate whom you prefer.
You'll have to ask Iraneus that since he is the one that taught this.
Seek and he shall find.Can you point out where he taught this?
ALL EPISTLES are written to christians, not sinners.