Going to Hell

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
err I was taking about all the Christians who will all say get behind me satan, because a satan is thought of as an evil spirit,

Which you fail to recognise could have been how the serpent went, and was described that way, the animal that was more crafty than any other animal, probably ate of tree of knowledge before Adam and eve did. And then became a satan.

Anyhoo you can rule it out if you want, nobody can fully agree on the story of Adam and eve, and nobody should be expected to.

None of that is biblical.

The devil (satan) is what lucifer became when he tried to over throw God.

That's when he because God's adversary and so God changed his name to satan which means adversary
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
None of that is biblical.

The devil (satan) is what lucifer became when he tried to over throw God.

That's when he because God's adversary and so God changed his name to satan which means adversary
well if you want to get technical Could you quote scripture where it Says God actually changed Lucifer's name to satan.

Lucifer in latin means a light bearer to bring light, and the name Lucifer is referenced just once in Isaiah 14:12 Which reads a prophesy can vary to mean future conflicts with Lucifer
But is extremely weird that Lucifer is only mentioned so late on in the bible as fallen, which could indicate he's only just fallen

Where as satan is referenced before then, it could just imply a name given for something becoming your enemy, and not not necessarily a name change by God. It's more a descriptive title of an enemy who is wicked rather than a title.
 
What's more weird @HigherGospel is some modern translations don't even use Lucifer in this context, now you can give your reasons why, but it won't be full proof. And you could call your understanding biblical and mine not biblical, all you like, the bottom line is you will not have an answer other than an idea


Isaiah 14:12-17

New King James Version



The Fall of Lucifer
12 “How you are fallen from heaven,
O [a]Lucifer, son of the morning!
How you are cut down to the ground,
You who weakened the nations!
13 For you have said in your heart:
‘I will ascend into heaven,
I will exalt my throne above the stars of God;


This part in particular


I will ascend into heaven,
I will exalt my throne above the stars of God;...



Reads why would God let somebody like this into heaven for heavenly counsel ?. And looks more like rebellion after the council meeting in heaven in Job.
 
A lot of the things we've seen that have inspired the treasures we have in heaven, would not have been possible if it weren't for ideas like these going about.
War inspired the tank, politics inspired much media, need and desire caused the making of things which in turn caused the need and desire to make better things.
As much as we're filled with Gods word, we wouldn't be the people we are today if it still weren't for the rest of the world.
The world doesn't keep rightousness, but we turn the things we take from the world into things for righteousness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eli1
Could you quote scripture where it Says God actually changed Lucifer's name to satan.
Jesus calls the devil satan - Matthew 16:23

Jesus is THE Word of God so we see the Lord went from calling the devil lucifer to calling him satan

Because lucifer is no longer a light berarer for God and has become God's adversary which is why the Lord calls him satan now.



What's more weird @HigherGospel is some modern translations don't even use lucifer in this context

That's because modern translations are vehicles for false doctrine the devil uses to deceive people



the bottom line is you will not have an answer other than an idea

Jesus called him satan and He's Lord

Jesus knows what He's talking about and you obviously do not.

I'm sticking with the Lord Jesus.


I will ascend into heaven,
I will exalt my throne above the stars of God;...

That's when lucifer rebelled and became God's adversary at which point he became satan.

Enjoy thy speculation, I'll stick with calling the devil satan as Jesus did
 
Jesus calls the devil satan - Matthew 16:23

Jesus is THE Word of God so we see the Lord went from calling the devil lucifer to calling him satan

Because lucifer is no longer a light berarer for God and has become God's adversary which is why the Lord calls him satan now.





That's because modern translations are vehicles for false doctrine the devil uses to deceive people





Jesus called him satan and He's Lord

Jesus knows what He's talking about and you obviously do not.

I'm sticking with the Lord Jesus.




That's when lucifer rebelled and became God's adversary at which point he became satan.

Enjoy thy speculation, I'll stick with calling the devil satan as Jesus did
Jesus called him satan because thats the name given to the adversary.

But the serpent in the garden of eden was a crafty animal called satan and it's believed the serpent was a crafty animal.

Many people call people satan to

Plus Jesus called Peter satan Was Peter satan too ?
 
Jesus called him satan because thats the name given to the adversary.

Yes the devil went from being lucifer to being satan because he opposed God and became God's adversary



But the serpent in the garden of eden was a crafty animal called satan and it's believed the serpent was a crafty animal.

The devil is a spiritual being who took possession of an animal's body



Plus Jesus called Peter satan Was Peter satan too ?

No, Jesus was speaking directly to satan who was behind the evil spirit leading Peter to disobey the Lord in that moment.

Jesus was not actually saying Peter is satan.

Isn't it past time for you to pull yer head out and simply believe God's Word? clueless-scratching.gif
 
Yes the devil went from being lucifer to being satan because he opposed God and became God's adversary





The devil is a spiritual being who took possession of an animal's body





No, Jesus was speaking directly to satan who was behind the evil spirit leading Peter to disobey the Lord in that moment.

Jesus was not actually saying Peter is satan.

Isn't it past time for you to pull yer head out and simply believe God's Word? View attachment 283841
Doesn't say satan was behind peter it's believed it was about a temptation from Peter to deviate Jesus from the path he was on to to fulfilling his Devine destiny of fulfillment , Peter was trying to persuade Jesus from his path that Jesus saw as a form of temptation, and temptation also being the adversary where the term satan is used

Peter was focused about worldly concerns, and temptation is seen as the adversary also in this case.

Then we go to the garden of eden where temptation came through the serpent, also known as temptation also being the adversary, that Jesus used the term satan for , that represents leading you away from good.

So it's not as cut and shut as you think. As the adversary can also come from any type of influence leading you astray
 
So it's not as cut and shut as you think.

Actually it is.

God is good, the devil is evil.

What part of this were you having a hard time grasping exactly?



Doesn't say satan was behind peter

It certain wasn't the Holy Spirit!

In this world one is either being influenced by the devil and his demons
Or one is being influenced by the Holy Spirit.

In that moment Peter was being influence by satan or one of the demons under satan's control which is who Jesus was adressing




Precious friends, more Full study is here: Hell, Sheol, Hades...

Is that the annihilationism heresy that's been going around?




this is not wrote in the bible either

What's not written in the Bible is that satan has a physical body.

As such he seeks to control the bodies of others including animals if it suits his needs at the time.
 
[Verse 1]
Well I woke up this morning feeling fine
I woke up with heaven on my mind
I woke up with joy in my soul
'Cause I knew my Lord had control
I knew I was walkin' in the light
'Cause I'd been on my knees in the night
And I prayed 'til the Lord gave a sign
And now I'm feeling mighty fine

[Chorus]
Well, I'm feeling mighty fine
I've got heaven on my mind
Don't you know I wanna go
Where the milk and honey flow
There's a light that always shines
Down inside this heart of mine
I've got heaven, heaven on my mind
And now I'm feeling mighty fine (yes, I'm feeling fine)

[Verse 2]
Now I'm walking with Jesus all the time
We're walking and talking as we climb
We're traveling a road to the sky
Where I know I'll live when I die
He's been telling me all about that land
And He tells me that everything is grand
And He says that a home will be mine
And now I'm feeling mighty fine.

[Chorus]
 
Actually it is.

God is good, the devil is evil.

What part of this were you having a hard time grasping exactly?.
this doesn't address what I wrote all it addresses is your ability to state a random truth to assume somebody must be liar because you've assumed they don't believe what your saying.




It certain wasn't the Holy Spirit!

In this world one is either being influenced by the devil and his demons
Or one is being influenced by the Holy Spirit.

In that moment Peter was being influence by satan or one of the demons under satan's control which is who Jesus was adressing.
again this isn't wrote for the reason Jesus addressed Peter, another assumption on your part.









Is that the annihilationism heresy that's been going around?






What's not written in the Bible is that satan has a physical body.

As such he seeks to control the bodies of others including animals if it suits his needs at the time.
again accusing people of heresy has to be proven, and do far you haven't proven nothing, your post is just full of assumptions.
 
What's not written in the Bible is that satan has a physical body.

As such he seeks to control the bodies of others including animals if it suits his needs at the time.
a demon possessing a person is not a reason you can fully lay all your assumptions on, which you do all the time, even assuming there the reason for every reason people are not agreeing with you.

Maybe you should tell me how you have so much knowledge about demons, on a personal level.

For one if a demon will possess an innocent animal it's means the demon hates innocence,

Why would that be well, because demons hates anything that is not a reflection of it's own nature.

And when that demon possesses innocence or tries to rule innocence, which could be any demon, that demon can become your adversary intent on leading you away from the truth. And that any demon can be called satan.

And any person leading people away from the truth deliberately without demon assistance can become your adversary
 
assume somebody must be liar because you've assumed they don't believe what your saying.

Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not true.



again this isn't wrote for the reason Jesus addressed Peter, another assumption on your part.

Again, just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not true.

If Jesus did actually claim Peter was satan then this is claiming Jesus is a liar.

And it's the claim that Jesus brought satan on as an Apostle and the claim satan wrote 1st and 2nd Peter and preached in the Book of acts.

Only a person listening to satan would claim such lies as they claim Jesus claimed Peter was satan.



again accusing people of heresy has to be proven

When you stand before the Lord in judgement, you'll find out.



a demon possessing a person is not a reason you can fully lay all your assumptions on

Spoken like one who knows little of God's Word.

We should really put this conversation on hold until you grow up in the Lord.

Spiritual babies can't even handle warm milk much less the meat of God's Word.


And any person leading people away from the truth deliberately without demon assistance can become your adversary

Any person leading people away from the truth are doing so with assistance from devils as they spread doctrines of demons.
 
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not true.





Again, just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not true.

If Jesus did actually claim Peter was satan then this is claiming Jesus is a liar.

And it's the claim that Jesus brought satan on as an Apostle and the claim satan wrote 1st and 2nd Peter and preached in the Book of acts.

Only a person listening to satan would claim such lies as they claim Jesus claimed Peter was satan.





When you stand before the Lord in judgement, you'll find out.





Spoken like one who knows little of God's Word.

We should really put this conversation on hold until you grow up in the Lord.

Spiritual babies can't even handle warm milk much less the meat of God's Word.




Any person leading people away from the truth are doing so with assistance from devils as they spread doctrines of demons.
Awe you can't threaten children of God, without God noticing.

I'm done with you
 
Jesus called him satan because thats the name given to the adversary.

But the serpent in the garden of eden was a crafty animal called satan and it's believed the serpent was a crafty animal.

Many people call people satan to

Plus Jesus called Peter satan Was Peter satan too ?
Essentially, "satan" is not a name; it's a role. It means "accuser". Think "prosecutor" in a criminal court case. It has come to function as a name.

As for the serpent in the garden, he wasn't merely a "crafty animal". The Hebrew rendered "serpent" doesn't literally mean "snake" like a garter snake or a copperhead.
 
Essentially, "satan" is not a name; it's a role. It means "accuser". Think "prosecutor" in a criminal court case. It has come to function as a name.

As for the serpent in the garden, he wasn't merely a "crafty animal". The Hebrew rendered "serpent" doesn't literally mean "snake" like a garter snake or a copperhead.
ok thanks for the input kind sir, sorry for our disagreements 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dino246