The gospel call has been in effect since Adam.This had a time specific application when Jesus spoke these words, it was before the Gospel call went out to the whole world.
Not everyone God calls will respond and be saved.
The gospel call has been in effect since Adam.This had a time specific application when Jesus spoke these words, it was before the Gospel call went out to the whole world.
we are saved by grace period.Belief/Faith in the personal Good News is God's condition to receive the gift of salvation.
You are correct, the "tulip" doctrines and all the various derivatives have become ubiquitous because they have purposefully blanketed the churches with these teachings over time.
I think I may be remembering the same person ... it was a woman and when it was pointed out what she was doing she would deny that also ... she would say basically that if someone chooses to believe then they become elect... That only a very few people like Moses and Paul were chosen. She really was kind of all over the place and she's been gone for quite a few months now...
Yet these same intellectual powerhouses can't seem to grasp the fact that when they say that salvation can be lost, they are saying salvation is works based and being "saved" is just being placed on Holy probation and is completely dependent on our behavior and the weight is ALL on our shoulders. I say this idea that by "free will" I walk in and out of salvation whenever I want, is completely unbiblical and renders God and Jesus as side characters to our power of choice. Somehow these enlightened gurus are very blind, and have no idea of, thought of, testimony of, or understanding of the POWER of God. Or they just ignore it in EVERY way.I just love these people who give their opinion and tell us "that's it, no question about it, end of discussion".
I say this idea that by "free will" I walk in and out of salvation whenever I want, is completely unbiblical and renders God and Jesus as side characters to our power of choice
I never did that.yes you did.
And this screed is proof you do not know 1 Corinthians 2. But you are playing the victim. Because I've read your posts till this. And you were far more rational then.This is not only an attach on my belief, but on myself. saying God entered me while I was still dead because of my sin, and prey much forced me to believe in him against my will.
And that says I was right.This is how I see it.. So I laughed because it is what I do. to keep me from lashing out.
Wow. That's quite a bit of double talk.I never implied any such thing, I just gave an opinion on what I see.
Passive aggressive personality disorder is a shame. A doctrine you do not like makes you attack those you accuse of posting as such. Making accusations about their being satanic etc...it will not stop me from showing my feelings about a doctrine I do not like. any more than it will stop you from showing your feeling about what I believe
Let us not forget, “tulip” was a response to the remonstrance heresy-the same synergistic wolf that’s always plagued the church, just wearing a different mask.Belief/Faith in the personal Good News is God's condition to receive the gift of salvation.
You are correct, the "tulip" doctrines and all the various derivatives have become ubiquitous because they have purposefully blanketed the churches with these teachings over time.
Let us not forget, “tulip” was a response to the remonstrance heresy-the same synergistic wolf that’s always plagued the church, just wearing a different mask.
——
Note to all: There’s always been a lying spirit, a majority who claim faith plus works-“synergists” and the remnant, a minority who are of the true spirit who claim salvation is entirely of the Lord-“monergists”.
The synergistic spirits (Islam, Mormons, JW’s, the majority of “evangelicals” etc) win the battle. Monergists win the war.
Which spirit dwells within you?
Same as Paul’s, see Galatians.What is "synergy" heresy in your view?
Same as Paul’s, see Galatians.
not sure I remember her.Right. And she had a friend and the 2 of them would bounce off each other.
I know the text of 1 cor 2 thank you.I never did that.
It is not my responsibility to know you do not know the text of
1 Corinthians 2.
And this screed is proof you do not know 1 Corinthians 2. But you are playing the victim. Because I've read your posts till this. And you were far more rational then.
And that says I was right.
Wow. That's quite a bit of double talk.
Your bully question? The post of yours I quoted. And your reply here wherein you defend your behavior.
That's a bully.
yawn.Passive aggressive personality disorder is a shame. A doctrine you do not like makes you attack those you accuse of posting as such. Making accusations about their being satanic etc...
I see.
I Hate isms..Well that does not really help to know what YOU mean.
not sure I remember her.
I know this debate raged a few years ago. A multiple of people from both sides were banned.. Sadly this discussion can get ugly
A whole thread was made to address her error.I believe it was just last year. There seems to be an overabundance of people who believe they have
an unusual talent for understanding scripture. They are often right. It is an unusual talent.
this was a few years ago. I actually left for a year after that, it was a rough time. But yes. the "know it all's? are in abundance in many chat rooms..I believe it was just last year. There seems to be an overabundance of people who believe they have an unusual talent for understanding scripture. They are often right. It is an unusual talent.
Is Niki7 who you are talking about. I went to the link and her precept was entirely wrong.. Its like happens alot. they think there are only 2 options where there are many more.A whole thread was made to address her error.
https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/the-elect-vs-free-choice.214939/