that's a troll ??
Not between husband and wife. No sin at all there.Anal sex is a sin whether done to a man or a woman
Ok sorry again. But this oP post was quite serious. I mean when we talk about salvation its life and when people refuse it, its death.C’mon, lighten up a little.
It's true, far too many people read with the intent to respond instead of hear.Im condescending sorry. But why should I respond to yours when you twisted everything I said to mean something outrageous and didnt bother to read the Bible yourself to check. Thats really rude and disrespectful in a christian forum to do didnt you know?
Try to read posts carefully before you assume things the poster did not say. How about using some active listening skills...and search scriptures. Its not hard to maybe check out the Bible to make sure rather than assume something totally wrong. It just makes yourself look like a fool. Thats why I said duh. Be noble, be a Berean and search scripture to see if things are so.
In other words use the brains God gave you and the Bible he sent you.
Where specifically in the bible does it state that anal sex between a husband and a wife is a sin? I suppose that pertains to oral sex as well. For the record my wife and I do neither but that is not because that it might be a sin but rather a matter of personal preference. I don't believe that there is any scripture that supports the position that anal sex between a husband and wife is a sin. Just because someone may find the thought distasteful does not make it a sin.Anal sex is a sin whether done to a man or a woman
bible doesn't say not to jump off a bridge either-Where specifically in the bible does it state that anal sex between a husband and a wife is a sin? I suppose that pertains to oral sex as well. For the record my wife and I do neither but that is not because that it might be a sin but rather a matter of personal preference. I don't believe that there is any scripture that supports the position that anal sex between a husband and wife is a sin. Just because someone may find the thought distasteful does not make it a sin.
In that case I would say that any type of physical intimacy between the husband and the wife is acceptable in the eyes of the Lord. Can't see how you said it was a sin but can't support that position with scripture. Like I mentioned in a previous post, just because someone may find that type of sex personally distasteful does not make it a sin. That is true for a lot of other things as well.The
bible doesn't say not to jump off a bridge either-
Um no I was referring to the passage in the Bible.
I was not saying what you are saying as you are making abosuletley no sense. Read the Bible ok?
They put down their stones because the people that were going to throw them were guilty of the same sins. Jesus said those without sin can cast the first stone, but obviously nobody in the crowd was without sin. Duh. Read John 8. They then all walked away till only the woman was left and Jesus forgave her. Didnt you read this passage in the Bible? If not read it again.
If you are gay, ie. practising sodomy sure you can go to a gay wedding, and 'enjoy it' or celebrate but if you are not gay, why would you even go?
Its actually abit different to the woman being caught in adultery being stoned situation. She wasnt having a public orgy and inviting everyone to witness it. People were going to stone her but what about the guy. Where was he?
Where specifically in the bible does it state that anal sex between a husband and a wife is a sin? I suppose that pertains to oral sex as well. For the record my wife and I do neither but that is not because that it might be a sin but rather a matter of personal preference. I don't believe that there is any scripture that supports the position that anal sex between a husband and wife is a sin. Just because someone may find the thought distasteful does not make it a sin.
In that case I would say that any type of physical intimacy between the husband and the wife is acceptable in the eyes of the Lord. Can't see how you said it was a sin but can't support that position with scripture. Like I mentioned in a previous post, just because someone may find that type of sex personally distasteful does not make it a sin. That is true for a lot of other things as well.
A man who is looking for the heart/will of God in the matter will see plainly that God holds "seed" in high regard. Man had better recognize this. To play games of ignorance regarding this matter will be at your own peril! Man carries the "seed":
G4690
σπέρμα
sperma
sper'-mah
From G4687; something sown, that is, seed (including the male “sperm”); by implication offspring; specifically a remnant (figuratively as if kept over for planting): - issue, seed.
LXX related word(s)
H319 acharit
H1121 ben
H1320 basar
H2233 zera
H5209 nin
H5220 nekhed
Where a man is to put this "sperma" in not left a mystery in the scripture. Into a rectum is to do more than despise the "seed" man is given...I could give words to describe how utterly insulting the act is, but you can find your own. Word of advice, seek absolute understanding in this matter before you place yourself at odds with a matter that is of particular importance to God.
Lots of good banter here, lots of good thoughts. Loved the discussion on the woman being stoned. Wish we knew what Jesus wrote!
In the end it's what would God have us do? If there's guilt by association then Jesus is guilty of a lot of sins. The primary guiding force I see is welcome sinners - but do not participate in their sin - and shun believers who refuse correction.
I'm glad I went; it's always good to keep an eye on what the enemy is doing, and I know I gave comfort to at least one other attendant who was really questioning if he should be there. As it stands lines of communication are open, but no of course I would not in any way 'hang out' with them. Yuk. Makes my skin crawl.
Lots of good banter here, lots of good thoughts. Loved the discussion on the woman being stoned. Wish we knew what Jesus wrote!
In the end it's what would God have us do? If there's guilt by association then Jesus is guilty of a lot of sins. The primary guiding force I see is welcome sinners - but do not participate in their sin - and shun believers who refuse correction.
I'm glad I went; it's always good to keep an eye on what the enemy is doing, and I know I gave comfort to at least one other attendant who was really questioning if he should be there. As it stands lines of communication are open, but no of course I would not in any way 'hang out' with them. Yuk. Makes my skin crawl.
There's still a sense of right and wrong ... HS keep convicting!The nephew didn't kiss his...uhhh.. "significant other" even though everyone whistled and yelled for him to do so. That's a good sign.
I would assume one would have to be saved to repent..?Is your nephew repentant can you tell?