Trying to justify your OT beliefs will not do you an ounce of good.If you are willing to see acts as a transitional period between the 2, it will become clear.
Trying to justify your OT beliefs will not do you an ounce of good.If you are willing to see acts as a transitional period between the 2, it will become clear.
Trying to justify your OT beliefs will not do you an ounce of good.
Even if you are right, which you are not, it wouldn't make any difference.No one is justifying any OT beliefs here, just reading the bible literally.
Even if you are right, which you are not, it wouldn't make any difference.
You mean you believe that Peter already knew in acts 2 that the law of Moses was no longer required for the Jews?
You mean you believe that Peter already knew in acts 2 that the law of Moses was no longer required for the Jews?
Peter at Gethsemane did not understand that Christ had to be delivered to the cross to die, and to rise again.
this is despite the fact Jesus had already told him ((Matthew 16:21)) point blank.
Peters lack of comprehension doesn't mean that the Messiah didn't have to suffer and die and rise and ascend and return.
If you are willing to see acts as a transitional period between the 2, it will become clear.
If a Jew at acts 2 were to ask peter “now that I repent from crucifying Jesus and be baptized as you have said, do I still need to keep the law of Moses?”
Peter would most certainly reply yes. So that means he cannot be preaching the same gospel Paul would preach later on in Galatians.
If you want to comment on a discussion that does not involve you, at least understand the discussion topic.
That is the point I was making to grandpa.
We can seek to live according to the law, or we can seek to be Holy and live a Sanctified life unto God.We are all under the law of Moses just not under the penalty . Christians are under the law of faith (the unseen gospel ).They are not exempt from going to jail or getting into trouble with their spouses.
Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
What kind of transitional period?
So make the transition.https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...-longer-need-to-keep-the-law-of-moses.185392/
As this long thread goes, the ascended Christ never told the 12 that the Law of Moses has been nailed to the cross.
So imagine their reaction when a former prosecutor of believers came to them, claiming that the ascended Christ told him privately that believers no longer need to follow the Law. No one could verify it except himself.
Put yourself in the shoes of Peter, James and John and you will behave exactly as what they would have done. That is the transitional period.
So make the transition.
If a Jew at acts 2 were to ask peter “now that I repent from crucifying Jesus and be baptized as you have said, do I still need to keep the law of Moses?”
Peter would most certainly reply yes. So that means he cannot be preaching the same gospel Paul would preach later on in Galatians.
If you want to comment on a discussion that does not involve you, at least understand the discussion topic.
That is the point I was making to grandpa.
Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...-longer-need-to-keep-the-law-of-moses.185392/
As this long thread goes, the ascended Christ never told the 12 that the Law of Moses has been nailed to the cross.
So imagine their reaction when a former prosecutor of believers came to them, claiming that the ascended Christ told him privately that believers no longer need to follow the Law. No one could verify it except himself.
Put yourself in the shoes of Peter, James and John and you will behave exactly as what they would have done. That is the transitional period.
Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
The Lord said it. They just didn't have the capability to understand. Until they were given the capability to understand.
They weren't preaching another gospel. They were preaching that part that they understood.
What part were they preaching? The death, burial or resurrection...that’s the gospel unto salvation.
They didn’t understand the gospel because God hid it from them until after it happened. If Satan understood the gospel beforehand, he would have never initiated the cross to happen. If he would’ve known that through the cross, Jesus would gain the victory, he would have done everything in his power to make sure the promised seed (Genesis 3:15) was not destroyed.
That's what I just said. I said they didn't have a complete understanding. Until they were GIVEN a complete understanding.
Acts 4:10-12
10 Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
Is any of this against the Gospel? No.
Is it the WHOLE Gospel? Again, no. But its a really good start.