Galatian Conundrums

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Absolutely said:
I actually like the man. But the main guru is a man named "green"
I read his book "green letters" (or something like that title)
They think Jesus preached a different gospel and paul came along to fix it.
Click to expand...

That is just silly
 
kaylagrl said:
We've already had a thread like this, not too long ago. Couldn't tell you the name. Either way I had the same argument, was like a dog chasing it's tail. One gospel for all or God is a liar and also unfair. No they would not listen. As you said, brain washed and will not change. smh
Click to expand...


hmmm

I missed that one

thankfully ;)

I mean when you post scripture that identifies exactly why what someone proposes cannot possibly be true, you know ain't no one gonna answer the door when you knock
 
  • Like
Reactions: kaylagrl
eternally-gratefull said:
Same with the “paul called it his gospel” line, scripture was posted which showed paul called it gods, christs, the gospel, of peace etc etc, and he did not even acknowldge it, then says we have issues with scripture
Click to expand...


he doesn't respond to very much with regards to scripture it seems to me

in fact, he called the scripture I posted from Galatians a rant because I commented between verses to make sure the points Paul was making were not missed

so I would conclude very little respect in this op from the author, for the Bible other than the distinction as a (cough cough) teacher he thinks it gives him

this is why it is so very very important for people to get into the word themselves to distinguish what is truth from the lies

we have to acknowledge and respect the fact that many who point to themselves as leaders are actually deceived and deceiving others

this is about as serious as it gets
 
7seasrekeyed said:
tradition is not law

Gentile Christians have traditions also

tradition is not the gospel though

and at the risk of boring the flighty among us, tradition is not law
Click to expand...
Posthuman hit the mark

That dynamic he posted(of course because he is post human) is the nail in the coffin.
I asked the paul only guy at our bible study to please explain it.
He never came back.
 
Lot`s of tongue wagging going on but no substance. No scripture. No answer for acts 10, acts 21 or the fact that Jesus commanded His discipes to keep the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yahshua
Absolutely said:
Posthuman hit the mark

That dynamic he posted(of course because he is post human) is the nail in the coffin.
I asked the paul only guy at our bible study to please explain it.
He never came back.
Click to expand...

would you please reference that post by Post?

not sure what you are referring to

thanks !...yes...Post is very good at posting sensible and logical responses....93% of the time
 
7seasrekeyed said:
he doesn't respond to very much with regards to scripture it seems to me

in fact, he called the scripture I posted from Galatians a rant because I commented between verses to make sure the points Paul was making were not missed

so I would conclude very little respect in this op from the author, for the Bible other than the distinction as a (cough cough) teacher he thinks it gives him

this is why it is so very very important for people to get into the word themselves to distinguish what is truth from the lies

we have to acknowledge and respect the fact that many who point to themselves as leaders are actually deceived and deceiving others

this is about as serious as it gets
Click to expand...
yep. You can see them easily, WHen people opose them they very quickly start to attack them, and the word gets lost and almost non existent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan
RickStudies said:
Lot`s of tongue wagging going on but no substance. No scripture. No answer for acts 10, acts 21 or the fact that Jesus commanded His discipes to keep the law.
Click to expand...
Dude I gave you the answers twice now

Stop your silly lies,

Its NOT all about you!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan
eternally-gratefull said:
Dude I gave you the answers twice now

Stop your silly lies,

Its NOT all about you!!
Click to expand...

well you can't teach an old dog new tricks

actually I did teach an old dog new tricks

maybe this is it:


h5B3FCFA7
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan
post 207 is just adding to the already confusing op

most here will acknowledge that Jesus ushered in a new covenant, but now the op is swinging with the law

I mean you can't get a grip on it....like a balloon with the skin off

PLUS the nerve to state no scripture when plenty has been posted by other than the op

he's kind of trolling at this point IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: eternally-gratefull
Absolutely said:
I actually like the man. But the main guru is a man named "green"
[…]
Click to expand...

Incorrect. The person to whom you refer (by your quotation marks) believed the Church started in Acts 2... not the later mid-acts, or acts 9, or any of the others (like perhaps, I believe if I recall correctly, L.Feldick teaches... and C.Stam)

They think Jesus preached a different gospel and paul came along to fix it.
Click to expand...

Inaccurate again. I would say that [member] Guojing (who holds to one of these "later into Acts" versions) does not say things like this, as you suggest.
 
RickStudies said:
I meant an answer that was Biblical and if it made a little sense would help.
Click to expand...
No, You wanted an answer that agrees with you, According to you, any answer which is different than yours is not biblical

This is a bible discussion forum, Not even is going to bow to your standards

You said no one answered, You lied plan and simple. Now repent.
 
eternally-gratefull said:
No, You wanted an answer that agrees with you, According to you, any answer which is different than yours is not biblical

This is a bible discussion forum, Not even is going to bow to your standards

You said no one answered, You lied plan and simple. Now repent.
Click to expand...

I didn`t lie. If you answered it I didn`t read it or I don`t remember it. I was trying to ignore you yesterday you stalker. You remember?
 
RickStudies said:
I didn`t lie. If you answered it I didn`t read it or I don`t remember it. I was trying to ignore you yesterday you stalker. You remember?
Click to expand...
you ignored me? hmm, I think all the red X's and other stuff shows this was not really true.

I responded to your post you made saying no one answered you yesterday, prety sure you were notified of that, since you were getting notified of my red x's top you.
 
eternally-gratefull said:
you ignored me? hmm, I think all the red X's and other stuff shows this was not really true.

I responded to your post you made saying no one answered you yesterday, prety sure you were notified of that, since you were getting notified of my red x's top you.
Click to expand...

the red x`s you were giving me is the only reason I took you off ignore. Had to give you some and share the love (y)
 
RickStudies said:
the red x`s you were giving me is the only reason I took you off ignore. Had to give you some and share the love (y)
Click to expand...
lol, When a person is on ignore. you do not see the red x's.. You only see them if they are not on ignore. (nice try)
 
  • Like
Reactions: posthuman
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back