Everything.Which part I stated actually made you thought that way?
Everything.Which part I stated actually made you thought that way?
Paul preached it.Don’t ask stupid questions. The gospel of the kingdom was for the Jews only
I engage you specifically.After all my postings to you and others in this thread as well as in other threads, I lol when you asked me that question.
Don’t be misled by absolutely, he is a troll.![]()
He was supposed to come and sit on David's throne in Jerusalem instead, which will now happen only after the Tribulation ends, and the 1000 year millennial reign begins.
You mean when Jesus was born, he was already rejected by the Jews? Is that really what you are saying?
You are replying to my post and yet not addressing any of my points at all.
But its okay, your posts tend to be like that. Cheers.
Do you realize none of the apostles were asking about whether Jews and Gentiles can now be saved together? They were not told anything about the mystery of the body of Christ comprising of Jews and Gentiles living in equality, that was revealed specifically to the Apostle Paul in Ephesians 2 and 3.
I have to admit my ignorance regarding the Paulines, it is a sect I am not familiar with with. Maybe you could fill in the gap for me. Thanks.
Thank you. Christianity sounds much better.Another word for it, more common, which I learned this morning, is "hyper-dispensationalism"
Galatians 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Ephesians 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
I suppose if you have a literal view nothing will make sense unless you do some sort of mental gymnastics with the bible.
The problem with most peoples view of scripture is that they didn't make sure that scripture is reconciled with the rest of scripture. They take a concept they think they see in one area of scripture and run with it, even though some other scripture may contradict it.
Once you see the contradiction the concept is over. So you purposely have to NOT SEE what scripture states in order to continue on with your concept of the Kingdom of God only being to Jews.
This seems to be commonly held error. Kind of weird.
The Lord Jesus took the OT scriptures and showed people, after He resurrected, how it was all about Him. He showed how even the OT was pointing towards Christianity. I wish these teachings were part of the bible. Some of the most interesting things to me are seeing Christ and Christianity in the OT. The way someone who truly understands Grace shows it.
Another word for it, more common, which I learned this morning, is "hyper-dispensationalism"
Galatians 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Ephesians 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
I suppose if you have a literal view nothing will make sense unless you do some sort of mental gymnastics with the bible.
The problem with most peoples view of scripture is that they didn't make sure that scripture is reconciled with the rest of scripture. They take a concept they think they see in one area of scripture and run with it, even though some other scripture may contradict it.
Once you see the contradiction the concept is over. So you purposely have to NOT SEE what scripture states in order to continue on with your concept of the Kingdom of God only being to Jews.
This seems to be commonly held error. Kind of weird.
The Lord Jesus took the OT scriptures and showed people, after He resurrected, how it was all about Him. He showed how even the OT was pointing towards Christianity. I wish these teachings were part of the bible. Some of the most interesting things to me are seeing Christ and Christianity in the OT. The way someone who truly understands Grace shows it.
As I understand it, the term "hyper-dispensationalism" pertains ONLY to those who hold to the idea that the Church which is His body started LATER in Acts (like Acts 9,13,18, or 28 [or whatever]); but "Pauline Dispensationalism" believes the Church which is His body started in Acts 2 (Eph1:20-23 WHEN) and does not fall under the "hyper-" banner.
So there is a distinction here. One can be "Pauline Dispensationalist" without falling under the "hyper-" category.
It took Christ Himself in direct communication with Paul and Peter to let them see their place in spreading the good news of the Kingdom of God.
Paul would see his ministry toward the gentiles.
Peter would see His ministry toward the Jews.
Peter however in his ministry toward the Jews could not bring Himself into the complete separation from the law.
This is where Christ came to Peter and through Peters dream showed Him that the jews and Gentiles where equal partakers in the Kingdom of God.
Peter was always known as the stubborn apostle. Even with that said it was also clear that for what ever reason Jesus held Him closer than the others.
Only Paul says differnt and everyone siddes with Paul not Jesus:
Galatians 2:7-8, “In fact, they saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel for the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel for the circumcised. For the one who worked through Peter by making him an apostle to the circumcised also worked through me by sending me to the Gentiles.”