#Ignorance.
The eye cannot identify the tiny fraction of a degree below "level" at which the horizon actually appears.
Read through the whole thread so that you don't keep asserting arguments which are long-since refuted.
You can't reason with a flat-liner. They all come from the same mold, posting a lot of idiotic pictures and videos and don't prove anything.I have a challenge for you, J70x7...
No more pictures...
Instead, travel to Southern Australia or New Zealand any time from November to February. Find a truly vertical pole around which you can mark where the shadows fall. You will see that they go from Northwest of the pole in the morning (North of due West) around the South to the Northeast in the evening (North of due East).
Then explain how that is possible on a flat earth with the "North Pole" at its centre. Remember, the Tropic of Capricorn is the Southernmost extent above which the sun appears at nadir (90 degrees to the horizon) so the sun should never be able to cast a shadow even the slightest bit North of a vertical pole located South of the Tropic.
Do the same at any location North of the Tropic of Cancer. The latter is explainable in the flat earth model. The former is not.
are you frick ... um, forgive my temptation to cuss, but seriously, why do you think the ship looks like it's sinking gradually, instead of "falling off a cliff", and the way you indicate curvature is a wrong way to look at it
if you can explain to me how the eyes can fool us, and explain where the missing square may be, then you are on your way to understand why we believe the earth is round regardless of all your vain pictures of how "flat" the earth looks along the horizondo you trust your eyes so much that you believe the earth is flat because it looks flat?
let's see how you trust your eyes for this one?
View attachment 185921
may we learn to "walk by faith, not by sight"