Flat earth debunked.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Moses_Young said:
I doubt you've ever seen an ant's legs either, from any sort of distance, but I assure
you they do exist, and they're not hidden by any imaginary curvature of the Earth.
Click to expand...
That looks like the type of nonsense answer you were complaining about.
 
Moses_Young said:
I think you should better describe your observation, because the sun's apparent size can depend on several factors. But I understand that on a clear day, the sun will appear smallest when it is overhead (around noon), and largest at sunrise and sunset.

My thinking for this is that our clearest view of the sun is at midday, when it is mostly overhead. As it moves further away, there is diffraction of sunlight due to the additional atmosphere it has to penetrate to reach you (atmosphere is thicker closer to the ground, so is easier to penetrate top-down, than horizontally), which can actually make the sun appear larger despite it being further away. Note also it is usually easier to look at the sun at sunset rather than midday, for the same reasons.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately your idea os simply incorrect. The sun’s apparent size changes because of reference information. The sun (and moon) look huge when there is abundant foreground data such as at rise/set. It has nothing to do with refraction.
 
Moses_Young said:
I already proved to you how radar disproved ball-Earth on a different thread. Radar supports a flat Earth, not a ball-Earth.
Click to expand...
You have proved nothing. All you managed to do is display your complete ignorance. You ignored everything I had to say on the subject, in spite of the fact that I studied then worked on microwave devices for four years. You ignore the facts then concoct a fantasy that only you and your equally deluded fellow flat earthers believe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back