Flat earth debunked.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Bob-Carabbio said:
The Airline industry provides proof thousands of times every day, as does the shipping industry. Why you'd pick "NASA" to "prove" your fantasy is beyond me.
Click to expand...

Airplanes and ships prove the earth is round, but it doesn't prove it's a globe. There are many skeptics of NASA, it's pretty main stream.

You might want to rethink your stance, but I agree that flat earth is outside of reason.
 
kinda said:
Airplanes and ships prove the earth is round, but it doesn't prove it's a globe. There are many skeptics of NASA, it's pretty main stream.

You might want to rethink your stance, but I agree that flat earth is outside of reason.
Click to expand...
Is this the spherical earth theory and the circle of the earth God sat on was the top?
 
a gyroscope in a plane tells the pilot if the plane is level, but as the plane goes around the curve of the earth, does the gyroscope turn with the curve? if so, what good is the gyroscope because its function is to keep the plane level.
 
Moses_Young said:
As the point has been made, it is implied in scripture. And faith in Christ is accepted as being just that - faith. Faith in NASA is somehow presented as being science, when its not. And NASA is fallible (not to mention evil, and deceptive).
Click to expand...
You funny
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sojourner414
if you ever look at the vids thats came out of naser(thats what the british call it) objectively, it really does look fake.
 
Zandar said:
if you ever look at the vids thats came out of naser(thats what the british call it) objectively, it really does look fake.
Click to expand...

Which ones? All of them since the first upper atmosphere shots? Because photos have been taken now for decades.
 
Moses_Young said:
Remember the fundamentals, science is testable and repeatable. Aside from the fact that NASA are proven liars, I'm looking for testable and repeatable science to prove the Earth is a globe. If it requires special knowledge (like NASA claim to have with their fraudulent photographs and Computer Generated Images), or special authorisation to achieve it, its not science. I have faith, but my faith is in Jesus, not in NASA or any other so-called space agency.
Click to expand...

The next time there's a lunar eclipse, take a look at the shadow the Earth casts on the moon. If the sun and the moon are circling in the sky (as flat earth claims), then there should be no shadow to begin with.

And before you try the "shadow object that orbits close to the sun so it cannot be seen" claim; were that the case, we would have both a lunar and a solar eclipse at the same time were that true.

Unless next you're going to claim "Nasa is doctoring what we see at night with the Moon".

BTW: I flapped as hard as I could; I'm sorry, but I could only get about 2 feet off the ground before my arms got tired.
 
Sojourner414 said:
The next time there's a lunar eclipse, take a look at the shadow the Earth casts on the moon. If the sun and the moon are circling in the sky (as flat earth claims), then there should be no shadow to begin with.

And before you try the "shadow object that orbits close to the sun so it cannot be seen" claim; were that the case, we would have both a lunar and a solar eclipse at the same time were that true.

Unless next you're going to claim "Nasa is doctoring what we see at night with the Moon".

BTW: I flapped as hard as I could; I'm sorry, but I could only get about 2 feet off the ground before my arms got tired.
Click to expand...

Don't waste your time bro. Just do what I do and have fun with him / it.
 
Zandar said:
a gyroscope in a plane tells the pilot if the plane is level, but as the plane goes around the curve of the earth, does the gyroscope turn with the curve? if so, what good is the gyroscope because its function is to keep the plane level.
Click to expand...

Depends on the plane of rotation of the gyroscope.
 
Bob-Carabbio said:
.

Chuckle!!! And the blind shall lead the blind. You might want to think a bit about your claim.
Click to expand...

I agree about the blind leading the blind, once your eyes are opened to the truth, you will question everything, you were taught, but hey, that's just me. Go ahead and believe man landed on the moon and any day now, NASA will send men to MARS.

Let's just say, there is nine pages of thought. Feel free to discredit it, when you get a chance. Do I have to beg? lol


https://christianchat.com/conspirac...rum/concave-hollow-earth-theory.198187/page-9
 
Moses_Young said:
Remember the fundamentals, science is testable and repeatable. Aside from the fact that NASA are proven liars, I'm looking for testable and repeatable science to prove the Earth is a globe. If it requires special knowledge (like NASA claim to have with their fraudulent photographs and Computer Generated Images), or special authorisation to achieve it, its not science. I have faith, but my faith is in Jesus, not in NASA or any other so-called space agency.
Click to expand...
It has been proven. There is far more eyewitness testimony to the ball earth than to the fact that Jesus lived, died and rose again. It can be shown empirically and proven mathematically. I don't know why Flerfers won't accept the facts. Special knowledge? Like the ability to see and measure? And the ability to be objective, not blinded by prejudice and false notions? You seem to be sadly lacking in those departments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back