It depends on the context. The word "face" has many meanings. It does not necessarily mean "flat".Yes, it is. Now: "on the face of the deep", is the "face" a flat surface (2d) or is it a sphere (3d)?
It depends on the context. The word "face" has many meanings. It does not necessarily mean "flat".Yes, it is. Now: "on the face of the deep", is the "face" a flat surface (2d) or is it a sphere (3d)?
When I first looked at this thread, I was impressed and interested to see some flat-earthers using Scripture, rather than just "common sense" to try to argue their position.
But now, when confronted by some here who have the time and energy to clearly refute (my view -) these Scriptures and definitions, it seems that these flat-earthers are returning to vague and accusatory generalities: such as:
The most 'rigid' and 'inflexible' Christians - by far - are those who let cognitive dissonance prevent them from exercising proper discernment in the study of the scriptures.
But, if they ever learn to let go of the world for the sake of the truth - and study the scriptures without the blinders on - they will be amazed at what they discover when they let the scriptures speak to them unhindered.
You have to trust the Word more than you trust your world view. But instead you hold on to your traditions, and continue to find a way out of circle. So when the Word rebuked your world view, you had to resort to changing it's meaning, just so you could keep your world view and your traditions, because you couldn't take the rebuke.
If the Bible indeed clearly teaches flat-Earth - then keep at it and prove it as such from the Word!
It depends on the context. The word "face" has many meanings. It does not necessarily mean "flat".
It depends on the context. The word "face" has many meanings. It does not necessarily mean "flat".
Deuteronomy 19:15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.you did that
It depends on the context. The word "face" has many meanings. It does not necessarily mean "flat".
mathematician
circle on the face' indicates a 10-dimensional surface.
The witness of God is greater.Here are a couple of articles discussing the soundwaves from the 1883 explosion of Krakatoa, the earlier claims the sound circled the globe 4x and the more recent claims 3x circling the globe before "petering out."
The witness of God is greater
this proves flat earth. Because sound waves cannot circle around a sphere, sound waves are not affected by gravity neither do they change their trajectory, the sound waves traveled straight above the flat plane. Then they hit the firmament and bounce back.
Surface. Exterior. Outside.What is the "face" of the deep? What context dino? What does it mean?
You clearly don't understand how sound travels. I suggest you stop making assertions from a position of ignorance.The witness of God is greater.
But this proves flat earth. Because sound waves cannot circle around a sphere, sound waves are not affected by gravity neither do they change their trajectory, the sound waves traveled straight above the flat plane. Then they hit the firmament and bounce back.
He has posted his theory, gives us your theory so we can compare the both of them. Or do you even have one?Welcome to CC…
You are trying to make a case based on a 400-year-old translation, using a modern understanding of the words. That’s subject to error. It is better to go to the original language to determine what the words meant in their original context.
I would also recommend using a modern translation. You quote Proverbs 3:5, but you need to abide by it as well.![]()
Do you have any evidence other than your own opinion to correspond with it? If so what is it?If the Earth was literally a circle it would need to be a perfect circle and two dimensional; the earth is neither of those. Therefore the writer was not being literal. What the writer seems to mean is that apparently, from the perspective of the human eye, the earth appears to be circular in shape when viewed from a fixed point on the surface because people view things from a fixed point on their head.
If you could view things from every possible perspective simultaneously the earth wouldn't look like a circle. Therefore the writer is speaking in human terms. So the writer is trying to explain what a person should be able to see, not a God's-eye view of the Earth from outer space.
Why should he refute what you cannot prove?Let's skip the whole "I believe this and if you have a different interpretation you're wrong" approach.
Do you want to actually refute what I wrote?
I don’t need to have a theory; the earth isn’t flat.He has posted his theory, gives us your theory so we can compare the both of them. Or do you even have one?
It is in a one dimensional perspective. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.I don’t need to have a theory; the earth isn’t flat.
No; I am not interested in entertaining manipulative questions.It is in a one dimensional perspective. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Can you agree with it?
That's been my whole point this whole time.1 John 5:9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.
Ok, now the "deep", what is the deep? And what is it's surface?Surface. Exterior. Outside.
Well, if you open a KJV right now, you can "verify for yourself" that "He drew a circle on the face of the deep". And this is exactly what I've been saying this whole time. Thing is they don't believe the Witness of God. Because if they did, this discussion would have been over by now.VERIFY for ourselves
Why would support be needed? Would the earth sink if not so supported? Into what would it sink?
But you sure like to entertain manipulative replies.No; I am not interested in entertaining manipulative questions.