Ezekiel?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Hitch

Banned
Feb 26, 2022
274
31
28
What is your best support from the prophet regarding the celebrated 'memorial' nature of the sacrifices he writes of?
 
There are several "natures" taught in the Bible, but I've never heard of a memorial nature. I use many many translations and this nature isn't mentioned. Can you describe it for us?
 
Wow a place full of pre trib rapture loves and no one wants to defend the memorial sacrifices idea. Im shocked shocked I say...
 
Are you here to troll or do something constructive?
I'll ask the same question of you ?

Since its obvious if you had a real response to the OP you would have posted it there is no need for you to answer the question above, better the standard emotional nonsense.
 
You may find this page (<= link) an interesting read :)

Thanks I wasn't sure what this was talking about at first, but I remember talking about it before under different names.

If I understand correctly, this is about how pre-tribbers believe that when a third temple is built that animal sacrifices will be reinstated. However, being unable to make the desired "memorial nature of the sacrifices" mesh with Ezekiel 40-48, they needed to invent dual covenant theology which allows two covenants to exist side by side. The old covenant, they say, is not obsolete and applies to Jews and the new covenant applies to Christians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pilgrimshope
Thanks I wasn't sure what this was talking about at first, but I remember talking about it before under different names.

If I understand correctly, this is about how pre-tribbers believe that when a third temple is built that animal sacrifices will be reinstated. However, being unable to make the desired "memorial nature of the sacrifices" mesh with Ezekiel 40-48, they needed to invent dual covenant theology which allows two covenants to exist side by side. The old covenant, they say, is not obsolete and applies to Jews and the new covenant applies to Christians.
Now THATS funny. Blasphemous but funny. But as in the OP , if real support for the memorial nature if the sacrifices exist the first place in the prophecy itself, then the apostles. And you're right the only support is wholly manufactured out of necessity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beckie
Now THATS funny. Blasphemous but funny. But as is the OP , if real support for the memorial nature if the sacrifices exist the first place in the prophecy itself, then the apostles. And you're right the only support is wholly manufactured out of necessity.

Totally agree!
 
Thanks I wasn't sure what this was talking about at first, but I remember talking about it before under different names.

If I understand correctly, this is about how pre-tribbers believe that when a third temple is built that animal sacrifices will be reinstated. However, being unable to make the desired "memorial nature of the sacrifices" mesh with Ezekiel 40-48, they needed to invent dual covenant theology which allows two covenants to exist side by side. The old covenant, they say, is not obsolete and applies to Jews and the new covenant applies to Christians.
The author/s also talk about how it clashes with Hebrews 9:9-14. I only skimmed through it, and thought it raised some interesting questions and counter conjectures on the matter of future sacrifices. I neither condone nor necessarily agree with any of it LOL. Just thought it was interesting reading and hoped someone may benefit from it :) And it did address what the OP asked about...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runningman